Business Smelters say they are losing power battle with Big Tech - US and European industry executives say high electricity prices are holding back efforts to rekindle domestic industry

1751328013269.webp
Smelting is an energy-intensive but crucial step in the production of the metals essential for a range of industries from energy to defence and technology © Ty Wright/Bloomberg

Camilla Hodgson in London and Jamie Smyth in New York
Published yesterday

High electricity costs and an intensifying battle with Big Tech for power are hampering US and European policymakers’ efforts to reshore strategically important metals processing industries, executives say.

Washington and Brussels are offering billions of dollars of taxpayer funds for smelting, processing and mining projects for metals such as copper and aluminium, in order to break China’s stranglehold on the industry. The US has also imposed punitive tariffs on imports in a bid to protect domestic industry.

But senior executives told the Financial Times that more support was needed to make western smelting and processing profitable, while Silicon Valley companies were pushing up the cost of power in the US.
“The most important factor deciding where you actually build a smelter is a long-term competitive power price,” which accounts for about a third of an aluminium smelter’s costs, said Trond Olaf Christophersen, chief financial officer of major aluminium producer Norsk Hydro.

He said that in the US, smelters were vying for electricity contracts with technology groups, which were willing to pay much higher sums in order to develop the data centres that underpin the artificial intelligence revolution.

Big Tech had “a much higher ability to pay for the power compared to an industry like aluminium”, said Christophersen.

One mining industry veteran characterised the dynamic as “not [US aluminium company] Alcoa versus China, but Alcoa versus Google”.

Smelting is an energy-intensive but crucial step in the production of the metals essential for a range of industries from energy to defence and technology. China dominates the sector, with European and US smelters increasingly struggling to compete with its scores of new state-backed factories.

China now controls more than half of the world’s smelting capacity for aluminium, according to the US Geological Survey. It also leads in the processing of other critical minerals, including rare earths and lithium, a trend that has concerned policymakers in the US and Europe.

1751328056922.webp

While smelters required long-term contracts for power at costs of about $40 per megawatt hour, Big Tech companies had penned agreements for upwards of $100 per megawatt hour, the US Aluminium Association said this year.

“Large-load customers remain willing to pay premiums to secure supply,” said consultancy Wood Mackenzie, adding that power prices in the US would “grow steadily in real terms”. Alex Christopher, senior aluminium analyst at market analysis group CRU, said the proliferation of data centres in the US would “only act to drive up competition for limited transmission capacity, forcing up prices”.

The Aluminium Association estimates that a single new aluminium smelter would use about the same amount of electricity each year as a city such as Boston or Nashville.

Although US power prices are below those in Europe, which remain elevated following the energy crisis triggered by the war in Ukraine, average costs last year were almost double those in Canada and significantly higher than in Norway, according to data supplied by Hydro.

Guido Janssen, chief executive of zinc and lead company Nyrstar, said many western smelters were operating on razor-thin margins. “What we need is competitive electricity prices, that’s key,” he said, adding that power prices in Europe were especially high.

The opening of new smelters in the US and elsewhere would also require government support, such as grants and “de-risking” mechanisms, such as a guaranteed minimum price and buyer, he said.

Nyrstar is planning to expand its US facilities to enable the production of germanium and gallium — essential for the defence and tech sectors. But Janssen said it would need government funds to be profitable. It is in talks to secure financial support.

The company’s lead smelter in Australia was lossmaking and “we don’t see this changing” without government support, Janssen added.

US authorities are in talks with two companies, Chicago-based Century Aluminum Company and Emirates Global Aluminium from the UAE, over incentives to build the first aluminium smelter in the US since 1980.

EGA said its project was contingent on the company securing a “competitive long-term power supply” and government financial support. Century declined to comment.

Source (Archive)
 
This shit is no joke, data centers for cloud storage and content distribution and AI centers suck up insane amounts of electricity. Hopefully the Small Modular Reactors for nuclear have successful pilot programs and really take off. It's an avenue we are going to be forced to take at some point, it's best to get it figured out now.
 
Huh so we need more electricity? If only there were proven technologies that can provide bulk energy at industrial scale..

Oh well, better build more solar panels LUL

The only short term solution I can forsee is mandating power be provided to these key industries at silicon valley's expense
 
Last edited:
Huh so we need more electricity? If only there were proven technologies that can provide bulk energy at industrial scale..

Oh well, better build more solar panels LUL

The only short term solution I can forsee is mandating power be provided to these key industries at silicon valley's expense
Solar modules are really great for small scale applications. It's sad that the climate change cult has led to government subsidies for big ass large scale solar fields which are fucking worthless in terms of producing usable energy economically. Nobody builds solar fields without tax dollar subsidies, which means it's obviously not efficient. Having an array on your cabin in the mountains to run a fridge and some DC lights at night? Great application! Trying to power a fucking city? RETARD ALERT

Edit: sorry drunk, wrote "era" instead of "array"
 
If we had more power, we wouldn't have to ration it out.

Seems to me the solution that makes everyone happy is more power plants.

But wait, here's why we can't do that... courtesy of "experts"........
 
Solar modules are really great for small scale applications. It's sad that the climate change cult has led to government subsidies for big ass large scale solar fields which are fucking worthless in terms of producing usable energy economically. Nobody builds solar fields without tax dollar subsidies, which means it's obviously not efficient. Having an array on your cabin in the mountains to run a fridge and some DC lights at night? Great application! Trying to power a fucking city? RETARD ALERT

Edit: sorry drunk, wrote "era" instead of "array"

Solar is also horrible to connect to the grid as it fluctuates wildly in output and frequency, causing massive strain on transformers and the grid.
 
Smelters bitching about power prices is a constant in this world, and probably always will be. It's always going to be in competition with other power consumers and probably the only way to keep it viable is to subsidize it to keep the $/kWh lower than any other consumer's rate. Used to live near a steel mill/smelter that consumed more power than the nearby city.
Power production capacity is a factor but not the sole factor. Even if you're producing vastly more (e.g. with a big boost to nuclear) the $/kWh is still more important, and excess capacity doesn't guarantee that the production cost is lower. In fact even with nuclear, if the costs are fully factored in to the consumer price and not subsidized away at some part of the life cycle, the $/kWh is not lowered.
 
Imagine living in a world filled with diversity hires and then loudly asking for one of the most complex machines known to man to be mass produced. A machine that should things go terribly wrong can poison nations irreparably.
Shaniqua about to make Chernobyl look like a joke.
 
Imagine living in a world filled with diversity hires and then loudly asking for one of the most complex machines known to man to be mass produced. A machine that should things go terribly wrong can poison nations irreparably.
Shaniqua about to make Chernobyl look like a joke.
I'd find it utterly carthartic if after whitey is gone, most of the planet is poisoned withplutonium, thanks to whitey mass producing breeder reactors. You know, like a massive and very real "Dead hand".
 
Just tell me who I'm supposed to hate this time please
Really? Passing up a chance to snipe at Trump's ineffective tariffs? You feelin' okay?

Turns out that just dialing up the cost of imports doesn't result in increases in domestic smelting! Damn if only someone had cracked open a world atlas and figured out why aluminum and copper are smelted predominantly in certain areas of the world...
 
Well, what's more important for a civilization? Steel, or billions of pajeets and other retards asking grok about things a normal person knows since third grade and generating spam and terrible pictures of lifeless figures with malformed hands and faces? Think hard, chud.
The future of humanity depends on hallucinating chatbot assistants.
 
Back