Some gay argument

doodoocaca

Daniel Sly is now the worst faggot ever.
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Sep 30, 2018
Homosexuality is a self-defeating sexual act that prevents you from carrying on your genes and prevents you from finding fulfillment because the end result of not finding your complimentary opposite half is either mindless hypersexuality or bed death with no in-between, and any children you steal adopt will wind up with learning disabilities and attention deficits at best or become delinquents or sex fiends at worst.

Transgenderism is a self-defeating fetish/fantasy/delusion that involves intense self-hatred for your immutable biological sex, narcissistic rage at anyone and anything that does not affirm you in your delusions, and self-mutilation and drug abuse.

Both homosexuality and transgenderism are objectively disordered, abnormal, and self-defeating, and most people understand this at a primal, subconscious level. Even gays and troons understand it even if they refuse to admit it.

So to compensate, they go out of their way to convince themselves that being a fag or a troon is awesome, throw huge parties over it, wave ugly flags around. But even when they get the rest of society to celebrate with them and kiss their asses, they're just as miserable and as wretched as ever.

Sorry, I've got to be an autistic faggot over this and split hairs.

Genes can be expressed among siblings in a way that makes the gene successfully pass on, by making one sibling take care of another, even if only one of the siblings reproduce. Likewise, you can be homosexual as fuck and still knock up a woman and raise kids, and this is known throughout history.

The issue is that faggotry is socially and culturally degenerate. Carrying on homosexual relationships doesn't necessitate one not have a family or be a responsible member of society. Faggotry, that is, hedonism, is the problem-in-itself. In the west, homosexuality got wrapped up in hedonistic bullshit, became an identity that was above reproach while getting hedonistic and shitty, and here we are.

There's probably plenty of truth to the old notion that "everyone's a little bi." There's also likely even more truth to the old wisdom of family being important and societal cohesion being paramount. Why not focus on "have families and give a shit about the society that made you and keep it keeping on" and try to limit hedonism? Why not promote healthy relationships? By going after "faggotry bad" (it is, not disagreeing) you're just making them dig their heels in and huff their poppers in petulant defiance.

Then again, who doesn't know that troons come from broken families and are alienated from society?

Edit: gonna add some thoughts on muh identity.

The notion of exclusively fucking the same sex, making a big deal about it, being a hedonistic faggot, and demanding attention is pretty western and pretty modern, AFAIK. While hedonists and libertines came and went from all walks of life, they generally only became remarkable and remembered if it was a rich person or someone fucking nobility, given the nature of life in older times requiring most people to work and not just be a parasite. They certainly weren't seemed worthy of praise or admiration for being hedonists on the dole.

For someone who is just naturally attracted to the same sex, there's absolutely nothing messaged to them except "fuck same sex, demand attention, claim victim status while enjoying privileges." They're not really encouraged to help society, they're told to help ~ the LGBT community ~ and see "the straights" as an other they're the enemies of. The ghastly notion of having an opposite sex partner for kids is seen as an awful suggestion, all the while they message ideations of turning straights bi or gay.

For people who have no direction, are lonely, or just attention starved, mostly nascent troons, they see how some kid who gets feels for the same sex is showered in attention and gets to have their life revolve around fucking and want in on it, and here we are. That's the root of the problem. The Troon Identity™ is jumping through hoops to be special. The Gay Identity™ is being a hedonistic faggot. The Lesbian Identity™ is bitching about men and keeping UHAUL in business.

Imagine if we took 15 or so steps back and instead said "you're just another person, get over yourself, consider family; you, too, are obligated to society; no one cares" and people weren't pressured to politicize and perform every fucking thing they do.
 
Last edited:
't necessitate one not have a family or be a responsible member of society. Faggotry, that is, hedonism, is the problem-in-itself. In the west, homosexuality got wrapped up in hedonistic bullshit, became an identity that was above reproach while getting hedonistic and shitty, and here we are.

Imagine if we took 15 or so steps back and instead said "you're just another person, get over yourself, consider family; you, too, are obligated to society; no one cares" and people weren't pressured to politicize and perform every fucking thing they do.
Women gatekeep sex. Men don't. Homosexuality will always devolve to heidonism because the average man wants to get as much sex as physically possible if not more.

Homosexuality didn't get "wrapped up" in heidonistic bullshit, heidonistic bullshit is its natural endpoint because (surprise surprise) it turns out men and women are not interchangable.
 
Women gatekeep sex. Men don't. Homosexuality will always devolve to heidonism because the average man wants to get as much sex as physically possible if not more.

Homosexuality didn't get "wrapped up" in heidonistic bullshit, heidonistic bullshit is its natural endpoint because (surprise surprise) it turns out men and women are not interchangable.

Culture helps moderate bullshit, among other things. There also absolutely is gatekeeping among fit homosexual men - "hardbodies only" is a common refrain for many a party. No, I'm not saying "as long as they work out it's OK to be a hedonist."

There are also TONS of slutty women, what the hell. Women can use sex or the promise thereof to manipulate most men easily, yes, but the suggestion that women aren't often promiscuous is ridiculous, as is suggesting that women somehow moderate hedonism through their essential nature. They do not. Also, women do want sex, believe it or not!

Suggesting that people pair up for life, avoid hedonism, and care about families is something brought about by culture. Heterosexual cultures can still be promiscuous and have Tinder related problems. It's not just gayness. It's a cluster of bullshit.
 
Culture helps moderate bullshit, among other things. There also absolutely is gatekeeping among fit homosexual men - "hardbodies only" is a common refrain for many a party. No, I'm not saying "as long as they work out it's OK to be a hedonist."

There are also TONS of slutty women, what the hell. Women can use sex or the promise thereof to manipulate most men easily, yes, but the suggestion that women aren't often promiscuous is ridiculous, as is suggesting that women somehow moderate hedonism through their essential nature. They do not. Also, women do want sex, believe it or not!

Suggesting that people pair up for life, avoid hedonism, and care about families is something brought about by culture. Heterosexual cultures can still be promiscuous and have Tinder related problems. It's not just gayness. It's a cluster of bullshit.
This is extreme cope. Women are objectively picker than men, this isn't up for debate. Slutty women existing doesn't change the fact that women are gatekeepers of sex.

They literally have to be due to the way male and female reproductive systems work. A man that isn't picky gets higher chances of reproduction by getting as many women pregnant as possible. He can't make a wrong descision.

A woman has to be picky because it takes 9 months and double rations to make a baby, if she isn't picky she might not even survive.


You think your average slutty woman is the one sticking her ass in a glory hole?
 
This is extreme cope. Women are objectively picker than men, this isn't up for debate. Slutty women existing doesn't change the fact that women are gatekeepers of sex.

They literally have to be due to the way male and female reproductive systems work. A man that isn't picky gets higher chances of reproduction by getting as many women pregnant as possible. He can't make a wrong descision.

A woman has to be picky because it takes 9 months and double rations to make a baby, if she isn't picky she might not even survive.


You think your average slutty woman is the one sticking her ass in a glory hole?

Contraception exists.
 
There are also TONS of slutty women, what the hell. Women can use sex or the promise thereof to manipulate most men easily, yes, but the suggestion that women aren't often promiscuous is ridiculous, as is suggesting that women somehow moderate hedonism through their essential nature. They do not. Also, women do want sex, believe it or not!

Suggesting that people pair up for life, avoid hedonism, and care about families is something brought about by culture. Heterosexual cultures can still be promiscuous and have Tinder related problems. It's not just gayness. It's a cluster of bullshit.

The number of women who are into anonymous sex at orgies and glory holes is considerably smaller than the number of gay men who are into it.
 
Can we just make fun of trannies plz?
Why does this thread get derailed so hard by dumb shit.
My guess is because obsessing over trannies specifically is something mental retards and politispergs do, so you can expect people in a thread about it to act like mental retards and politispergs?
 
I'm inclined to agree with @Oilspill Battery. AFAIK, this is explained by difference in testosterone levels in men and women. Women have less T, so they get less horny and are less inclined to fuck the first random stranger they feel sexual attraction towards. This is also why FTMs and men on T report having an increase in libido.

However, if you're a gay man, this doesn't mean you have to be a hedonist and participate in orgies.
 
Back