Feedback Technical Grievances

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
They resell tucows who don't want KF (i think)
Only for new gTLDs and most country codes (ie not .net)
Source: https://easydns.com/terms-of-service/

Although, reading that TOS it might be a bit dicey? They go on about not violating the "NAP" which makes them come off as libertarian types (good), but then say Nazis and the KKK are the kind of stuff they'd ban. This is also confusing because they say they support "voluntaryism" as well (translation: they're literal ancaps, and thus should be free speech absolutists).

The :optimistic: in me thinks it might just be a CYA to ban blatant fedposters but there's a good chance I'm huffing copium tbh.
 
Last edited:
At this rate: Null is going to have to have to either make himself a space station with his own satellite network and internet or some seastead thing. In all seriousness though: the Internet has become less free and more gay every single year and no one in positions where they could do anything about it cares or even questions the next stupid thing demanded of them.

In the last 20 years, we’ve gone from a society of trailblazers, innovators, and pioneers to a fat, lazy, and overly socialized slobs. The only people doing anything new and inventive are oppressive governments and defense contractors. What we’re seeing happen to the Internet right now seems to be a symptom of western decline into hedonism where people would rather coom, drink, or get high than create a lasting legacy. Hopefully that can eventually turn around because sadly there isn’t really a good alternative culture elsewhere in the world to embrace.
 
Do any of these people (A) look like the type who'd stick their neck out for KF? Not one of these people looks even remotely based.
Their TOS is surprisingly good: https://porkbun.com/legal/agreement/product_terms_of_service
For TLD registration, there's no references to defamation, harassment, etc (outside of their respective legal definitions, which are obviously US-illegal anyway).

I'd trust that and their known track record with lolcow.farm and Ovarit over "they don't look based". Though obviously even with the free speech-friendly TOS there isn't a guarantee they'll do business with the Farms.
 
Last edited:
IMG_2563.png

Unreal. Scummy, cowardly, mealy mouthed bugmen.

We will arbitrarily terminate service if we don’t like what we see.

I like how they see problematic words as the equivalent to a crime, and bundle wrongthink in with encouraging terrorism. One of the most repulsive innovations in left wing strategy is treating speech as an act of violence, this has been at the heart of how TRA’s have operated since entering the culture war.
 
I'm sure you've thought of it null but seeing as you're having a good run with the based polacks, is there any good registrars there you can lean on?
 
In the last 20 years, we’ve gone from a society of trailblazers, innovators, and pioneers to a fat, lazy, and overly socialized slobs. The only people doing anything new and inventive are oppressive governments and defense contractors. What we’re seeing happen to the Internet right now seems to be a symptom of western decline into hedonism where people would rather coom, drink, or get high than create a lasting legacy.
I always knew my generation was fucked up and would eventually destroy the world. They're all self-absorbed drunken coomers.
 
View attachment 5562663

Unreal. Scummy, cowardly, mealy mouthed bugmen.

We will arbitrarily terminate service if we don’t like what we see.

I like how they see problematic words as the equivalent to a crime, and bundle wrongthink in with encouraging terrorism. One of the most repulsive innovations in left wing strategy is treating speech as an act of violence, this has been at the heart of how TRA’s have operated since entering the culture war.
Unfortunately, it seems like we’ll never get a Supreme Court case where they find that private corporations can’t cut you off from the internet for your speech or website content. I wish the people wanting to brainwash people and censor the internet at least did a decent job: a lot of their recent stuff has been obvious propaganda. Especially the Israel and Ukraine stuff.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GenderCop
I was wrong about Njalla. It would not work for KiwiFarms. What other options there are left to be considered for Null (he says he has a "long term option in mind")?

List:
1948
Fransisco
Porkbun
EasyDNS
 
Last edited:
kiwifarms.af when? Wonder what would happen if Kiwifarms used TLD owned by the Taliban
That would probably run afoul of US sanctions, which would get Null's bank account closed. Banks routinely scan their customers' activity against OFAC lists, to make sure they aren't laundering money for terror groups, cartels, or hostile countries.
 
Last edited:
Trigger warning: "Muh free market" normie faggotry

View attachment 5562179
Literally quotes Wikipedia. Lmao.

I would put money on this fart huffing faggot thinking he's an "intellectual", despite the fact he's quoting fucking wokiepedia. You would think tech people of all people wouldn't just "listen and believe", but then you remember 90% of them are trannies.
 
There's been like one "Technical Grievance" in more than 10 pages. Could you please move your discussion on what domain Null should use to his MATI thread, or 'I hate the Internet and the people who own it' thread? I don't think supersaturating, and bloating out by excess, any legitimate technical complaints is helpful for the site.
 
Back