Feedback Technical Grievances

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Not sure if this is something expected, but in the community happening post here
I get a you must be logged in if I click the attachment link here
1752175811032.webp
eta: i mention because at first I thought I clicked a bad link or something,
 
on TOR you cant see attachments linked to clearnet in chat due to CSP

1752228815658.webp

Code: 
Content-Security-Policy: The page’s settings blocked the loading of a resource (img-src) at https://kiwifarms.st/attachments/hi-4-gif.6397184/ because it violates the following directive: “img-src 'self' data: https://no-cookie.kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion https://uploads.kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion https://files.kick.com https://litter.catbox.moe https://files.catbox.moe https://catbox.moe https://i.postimg.cc https://i.ibb.co https://images2.imgbox.com https://qu.ax”
 
Work mostly complete.

I dropped about $3,000 to get new hardware to increase my access to the servers so that we have to rely on remote hands less often which will decrease downtime in catastrophic events. I am upgrading our network to 10G from 1G. I intend to reduce the complexity of our topology so that the site has less latency with every request.

The most important change is that we have added an optimized NVMe SSD in RAID 10 on XFS for the database. The database is very large and when our previous NVMe raid failed I moved it to the SSD raid that is optimized for files. Thus, the attachments and database were competing for I/O, which is why both broke frequently. This new raid is a completely separate set of devices which means that not only is the database on very recent harddrives with a better connector (NVMe vs SATA), it is also no longer competing with the S3 file system that handles attachments. This will make both load faster.

It's 3am and I'm tired but this is only the first step towards optimizing things. I will do more work over the week.

This is brought to you by the GiveSendGo donors btw, thank you for helping me help you help us all.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Jonkler, Rungle, BeckhoffAX5702 and 289 others
Null said:
Work mostly complete.

I dropped about $3,000 to get new hardware to increase my access to the servers so that we have to rely on remote hands less often which will decrease downtime in catastrophic events. I am upgrading our network to 10G from 1G. I intend to reduce the complexity of our topology so that the site has less latency with every request.

The most important change is that we have added an optimized NVMe SSD in RAID 10 on XFS for the database. The database is very large and when our previous NVMe raid failed I moved it to the SSD raid that is optimized for files. Thus, the attachments and database were competing for I/O, which is why both broke frequently. This new raid is a completely separate set of devices which means that not only is the database on very recent harddrives with a better connector (NVMe vs SATA), it is also no longer competing with the S3 file system that handles attachments. This will make both load faster.

It's 3am and I'm tired but this is only the first step towards optimizing things. I will do more work over the week.

This is brought to you by the GiveSendGo donors btw, thank you for helping me help you help us all.
Click to expand...
Well, you are not always the most stable individual, but thank you for your hard work.
 
  • Feels
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Wright, GunCar Gary, Irrational Exuberance and 2 others
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Aunt Carol, The Mass Shooter Ron Soye, Active User and 2 others
Might have been some botched session or whatever, closed and reopened and it just works now. Buttery smooth. :semperfidelis:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back