🐱 The Editor's Notes For Milo Yiannopoulos' Cancelled Book Have Been Revealed

CatParty
https://www.bustle.com/p/the-editor...-revealed-its-worse-than-you-imagined-7707550


As the feud between white nationalist Milo Yiannopoulos and his former book publisher heats up, documents pertaining to Yiannopoulos' lawsuit against Simon & Schuster have brought the Internet to its knees with laughter. Yiannopoulos' book, Dangerous, was originally scheduled to be released by Simon & Schuster imprint Threshold Editions in June 2017, but the publisher cancelled the book in February 2017 in the wake Yiannopoulos' controversial comments about inappropriate relationships between grown men and children. In July 2017, Yiannopoulos filed a $10 million lawsuit against Simon & Schuster alleging a breach of contract.

Now, documents from the lawsuit have surfaced, and among those papers is a full-length copy of Milo Yiannopoulos' manuscript with notes from his editor, Threshold Editorial Director Mitchelle Ivers. While Ivers' comments on the former Breitbart News editor's canceled book, Dangerous, will definitely provide plenty of laughs for those who revel in the schadenfreude of Yiannopoulos' situation, the court documents also reveal that Ivers is not just another person exasperated with his brand of thinking. Mitchell Ivers' comments were designed to make Dangerous into the best, most convincing book it could be for the sake of the white-nationalist movement. Yes, this is part of Ivers job as an editor, but it's still a little frightening.

If you have no idea who Milo Yiannopoulos even is, here's a little backstory. Yiannopoulos made a name for himself in the so-called alt-right movement with his transphobic, ableist, anti-Semitic, sexist, Islamophobic, racist, and often homophobic rhetoric, and has drawn additional ire for comments made about inappropriate "relationships" between grown men and boys. He regularly attempts to deflect these criticisms by saying that he can't possibly be anti-Semitic, racist, or homophobic, because he was raised Jewish and has a black husband.

Over the years, Yiannopoulos has been involved in a number of high-profile Internet attacks on women. He was a leading figure in the Gamergate movement, and later instigated the misogynoir dogpile on Ghostbusters actress Leslie Jones.

So when Yiannopoulos sold Dangerous to Threshold Editions for $250,000, people were justifiably outraged. The Simon & Schuster imprint is well known for publishing "an arsenal of conservative pundits," including "Glenn Beck, Donald Trump, Rush Limbaugh, Dick Cheney and Bobby Jindal," but the fact that Yiannopoulos landed his six-figure deal just after Twitter permabanned him for harassing Leslie Jones made the Dangerous acquirement feel a whole lot like a pat on the back.

As you might expect, Simon & Schuster's decision to publish Yiannopoulos' book prompted a swift response from the literary community. Roxane Gay pulled her forthcoming book, How to Be Heard, from Simon & Schuster imprint TED Books, and 160 children's book authors and illustrators signed an open letter condemning the publisher for giving Yiannopoulos' hate speech an outlet. In response to the backlash, Simon & Schuster rescinded its $250,000 advance and canceled Dangerous, which brings us to where we are today, with Yiannopoulos in the process of suing his former publisher after self-publishing his book.

Because Yiannopoulos' Dangerous manuscript is part of his case against Simon & Schuster, comments from his editor at Threshold, Mitchell Ivers, are freely available online. Ivers appears to grow more frustrated with Yiannopoulos' antics as the manuscript wears on, as you can see from Sarah Mei's Twitter thread below.

https://archive.is/03sMs

So yes, laugh because Milo Yiannopoulos' book manuscript was so bad that even his editor turned on the Caps Lock. But don't think that this book didn't have its supporters.


DSEd1_DUEAII3mR.jpg DSEd1-6VoAE3Jp2.jpg DSI7fodXUAYawE3.jpg


full court document
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=VhVQNjyOxzgx32b52YsZJg==
 
Last edited:
I gather they're producing these documents to show that before the manufactured scandal, they already had issues with Milo and his lazy-ass writing, and that the quality of the manuscript itself rather than the scandal was why they breached their contract (or terminated it for cause which I assume is their claim).

It's the timing of these events that is important. I forget when the scandal happened, but they seemed to dump him immediately afterwards.

If they were already having angry words exchanged before that, and Milo didn't get his shit together and address those issues, it's probably a pretty good defense.
 
I gather they're producing these documents to show that before the manufactured scandal, they already had issues with Milo and his lazy-ass writing, and that the quality of the manuscript itself rather than the scandal was why they breached their contract (or terminated it for cause which I assume is their claim).

It's the timing of these events that is important. I forget when the scandal happened, but they seemed to dump him immediately afterwards.

If they were already having angry words exchanged before that, and Milo didn't get his shit together and address those issues, it's probably a pretty good defense.

On January 14th they sent the emails basically stating that Milo's manuscript was crap and outlining why, and that they "reserve the right of additional review and discussion of acceptability."

The video controversy erupted on February 19th.

They dropped publication of the book on February 20th.
 
The reason people can't stand Milo isn't because of his political views, white nationalist or otherwise. He'd be equally annoying if he were a lefty, because his personality is grating and he goes out of his way to be antagonistic. He's no William F. Buckley; he's not even whatever third rate columnists they have at the National Review these days.
 
His writing style is agonizing. Trying to patch that drivel into a book would be a Herculean task. This is the type of junk that you self publish. Because it's not worth wasting the time of a large company. Either that or you get a ghost writer. Why did he think he could do this himself when he has no talent as a writer?


On January 14th they sent the emails basically stating that Milo's manuscript was crap and outlining why, and that they "reserve the right of additional review and discussion of acceptability."

The video controversy erupted on February 19th.

They dropped publication of the book on February 20th.

So they already decided it was a piece of hot garbage then Milo cries foul like he deserves to have hot garbage professionally published?:lol:
 
On January 14th they sent the emails basically stating that Milo's manuscript was crap and outlining why, and that they "reserve the right of additional review and discussion of acceptability."

The video controversy erupted on February 19th.

They dropped publication of the book on February 20th.

That really nukes his case. Before now, I was of the belief that they came to a hurried decision to dump him solely because of the sudden eruption of a controversy they had no reason not to know about beforehand. I'm not sure if it's fatal to the case, but it certainly reduces its settlement value considerably.
 
The reason people can't stand Milo isn't because of his political views, white nationalist or otherwise. He'd be equally annoying if he were a lefty, because his personality is grating and he goes out of his way to be antagonistic. He's no William F. Buckley; he's not even whatever third rate columnists they have at the National Review these days.
No one would have cared about Milo if he was a leftie, he'd just be some annoying gay guy.
 
No one would have cared about Milo if he was a leftie, he'd just be some annoying gay guy.

This kind of shit is why I actually kind of sympathize with this fag. He is continually showered with absolutely ludicrously false allegations solely because he is gay and despite that, has opinions (albeit incredibly stupid ones) of his own.

Sure, he's invited the negative attention and even gone out of his way to court it, but it's utterly pathetic that the left is apparently entirely incapable of just dealing with the fact that there are some members of the classes they claim to "protect" who want nothing of their bullshit.
 
On the one hand, milo is an atrocious writer, and when a publisher picked up his book I figured they would do basic copy editing and pump his book out with minimal investment for his fans to lap up, so I'm not surprised it's trash.

But on the other hand, every celebrity is an atrocious writer, that's why they use ghost writers. The only celebrity who can write is Norm Macdonald.
 
On the one hand, milo is an atrocious writer, and when a publisher picked up his book I figured they would do basic copy editing and pump his book out with minimal investment for his fans to lap up, so I'm not surprised it's trash.

But on the other hand, every celebrity is an atrocious writer, that's why they use ghost writers. The only celebrity who can write is Norm Macdonald.

He's not that bad a writer, he's just really fucking lazy. He's solely in it for the rush of getting his faggy face on TV.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Marvin and polonium
Back