The Fourth Reich Is Coming - A perspective on current political and social developments

XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG

lrhhtf oo uTinfiars oEs dto og
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 14, 2022
I came across an, in my opinion, very interesting opinion piece by a German blogger [A], published very recently, and I would like to hear more thoughts on the matter. The text raises some interesting points that I honestly haven't come across anywhere else.

For your convenience, I've translated it myself as follows:
The Fourth Reich Is Coming

For 25 years, I have been trying to figure out what is actually happening in this country.

And, in these 25 years, I finally came to a point where I believe to understand it.

I have frequently written that the Nazis, the NSDAP, were anything but this singular point in history that they are often presented as, but, instead, merely a brief flash of a counter position to communism, who were scouted like a boy group and got plagiarized, especially by the communists.

The line of "national socialists" across Mussolini, Hitler, Franco was anything but a counter position to socialism/communism as the labels "right wing" and "left wing" (are supposed to) suggest, because they themselves were socialists, but rather a war of brothers spawned out of a dispute on whether nations and country borders should be kept or not. It's got the vibe of the dispute of the Albrecht brothers regarding whether cigarettes should be sold, which led to the split into Aldi Nord and Aldi Süd. Or the dispute between the Dassler brothers whether to join the Nazis, after which the company broke off into Adidas and Puma. Sometimes, those who are identical except for a detail become the fiercest enemies - a war of brothers.

The similarity between Nazis and communists is often striking. In the Berlin Stasi prison there once was an exhibit on architecture, showing how similar Nazi and communist architecture was, basically direct plagiarizations.

It is always claimed that leftists are the Nazis' enemies, but they systematically aren't. Leftists only hold it against Nazis that they were nationalists and prevented West Europe from being overtaken by communism. If you look close enough, you notice that leftists genuinely envy and imitate the Nazis in many ways. The Nazis were better-organized and had more media competence, fancier uniforms, and more discipline than the communists back then and Antifa today. I've been writing for years that, to me, it looks like the leftists want to inherit and imitate what the Nazis did, using exactly that which the Nazis copied from the communists [sic], because they did it more effectively and systematically.

It is always claimed that communists/socialists and Nazis are diametrical opposites, but as I described so often, they both seem the same to me and only differ in parameters. And like I described, I believe that this is based on the same brain structures and the same archaic, evolutionary developed behaviors. I believe communists and Nazis are identical in almost every way.

And that is why I believe that leftists - whether consciously or subconsciously - imitate and copy the Nazis. Leftists, sociologists, communists dissected the Nazis very thoroughly, know their methods, know how they worked. But, they warn - I often criticized this when it came to Holocaust exhibits - not against their methods, but their symbols. Swastika. Brown uniforms. Boots and so on. Even though Antifa is hardly any different. Different logo, black instead of brown.

Meanwhile, I am convinced that they are repeating after the Nazis, just with a few differences:
  • In place of "national socialism", an "international socialism" without borders, a global and pervasive socialism. No more foreign country to flee to.
  • There is another artificial better race, but instead of the blonde-blue Aryans of the Nazis, they are creating a new mix, a mixed human for which they - a proven and propagandistically usable fact - melted all people and genes of this world to create an artificial human that can't dissociate from anybody and that nobody can dissociate from, to be worldwide.

    But it is not merely, and this, to me, is extraordinarily important to recognize and to understand, not about socialism no longer being national and rejecting borders. It is about melting together this mixed human in a way that nobody can dissociate from it, because every country, every people is "represented" in this mix.

    That is why there is a mass importation of people here. They are the baking ingredients of the big human mixture cake. That is why everything needs to be "inclusive" and why they're throwing money at people so that as many of them come as quickly as possible.

    And that is also the reason why they are so islamophilic and why they want to have as many Muslims as possible. In this project, Muslims are the toughest, biggest, and most closed-off nut.

    And this leads to something that is not self-evident and not easy to understand:


    We always perceive politics as the destruction of the West, as a threat to our civilization, as an Islamic invasion. It is all of these things, but not just that. It is also an attack against Islam. Its goal is the destruction of Islam. Because, like with every other genetic or ethnic group, it is about breaking its ability to dissociate, in biological terms, to trick its immune system by playing up how Muslim you are.

    In other words: Islam can dissociate itself from the West, the Christians, the whites, the infidels, the crusaders, and so on, and it is very effective and very stable in doing so. You won't be able to crack the Quran, you simply can't get past the distinction between believers and infidels. But if you flood Europe with Muslims, this defense mechanism, this - hated by the leftists - race, identity, national behavior is disabled.

    From the amygdala's point of view: Their friend-or-foe recognition is being taken away from them. The option of dissociating from Europe is taken away from Muslims.

    It's not about tolerance and wokeness, they are just means to an end, merely tactics and not strategy.

    It is about building an emulsifier of peoples. Normally, watery and fatty liquids, hydrophilic and lipophilic, or hydrophobic and lipophobic, cannot be mixed. But if you add an emulsifier, the border lines get torn, allow them to be mixed into an emulsion.

    To this end, they build the omni-tolerant, the multi-woke, the gender-fluid mixed human, the superset of all characteristics, as a kind of human whom nobody can dissociate from because there is no characteristic with which you can differentiate yourself from it. No matter whether Muslim or Amazon Indian, whether man or girl or everything in between, no matter what skin color, language and origin, nobody in the world is supposed to be able to differentiate themselves and dissociate from this omni-compatible mixed human.

    It is similar to the search for the universal artificial blood that can be supplied to people of all blood groups without triggering a rejection reaction.

    They want to build the kind of human, the Neo-Aryan, who isn't "better" than others, like with the Nazis, but who is compatible with everybody, who nobody can differentiate themselves from. No Indian can say "me Indian, you paleface". No black person can say "I'm black, you're white". And no Muslim can say "I'm a believer, you're an infidel". And especially, which is why this gender nonsense exists, nobody can say "I'm a man, you're a woman". And nobody can say "I'm an engineer, you're stupid" either. They are systematically sanding off all characteristics to mix together an omni-compatible universal human that nobody can dissociate from. Not even "I'm an analphabet, you're educated".

    Many people like talking about the Islamic invasion of West Europe. Yes, that is true, that is what's happening right now.

    But the bigger plan is the invasion of socialism into Islamic countries. And that requires taking away the Muslims' ability to dissociate themselves from us.

    The wolf in sheep's clothing.

    Somebody once said that leftists and Muslims are each other's useful idiot. The question is who of the two wins in the end.

And thus we are facing an agenda that is mostly identical to that of the Nazis, with the goal of building a society based on an artificial miracle race. Only with the differences:
  • The Nazis didn't want the whole world. They were happy with "German Reich" plus expansion.
  • The Nazis didn't want global homogeneity. They didn't want to fundamentally abolish countries and ethnicities.
  • The Nazis' Aryan was - in their eyes - an extraordinarily capable, beautiful, flawless human, indistinguishably [sic] better than others according to their imagination.

    The leftists' Neo-Aryan is not good, it's not supposed to be (it would be distinguishable in that case), but its main characteristic is that every attempt to distinguish it fails, and nobody is able to dissociate and distinguish from it. No matter where it goes, it's supposed to be perceived as belonging there. With the purpose of neutralizing country borders and nations.
  • If you were lucky, you could flee from the Nazis to another country. According to today's ideas, there is nothing left to flee to.

I am convinced that the Fourth Reich isn't coming, but that we're already in the midst of it, and that all the "anti-fascists" are currently doing exactly the things they learned from the Nazis.

Years ago I have already written that they're replaying the 1918/19 revolution and that they want to repeat it with a 100 year delay, only this time with the "right" result. And that they make use of the methods of the Nazis. But in the meantime, I believe that they are building something like the Third Reich - but worldwide.

The leftists' islamophilia has always been confusing to me, but this idea of "consuming" Islam to defeat Islam (to advance socialism) makes a lot of sense. I mean, there is good and accurate analysis from a libertarian perspective of why the Left allies with Palestine against Israel, but that doesn't explain the pervasive islamophilia.

Also, this tricking of the defense mechanism might sound stupid at first, you might think "of course I'll be able to distinguish between friend or foe regardless of how they appear", but even people who aren't part of the current dominant force (such as right-wingers) make the same mistake. I've had several conversations with committed and fervent conservatives who claimed that some, for instance, ethnic German is infinitely more German than a non-biological German could be. Even if you tell them "but this ethnic German is indoctrinated with communist propaganda and this foreigner will be infinitely more culturally and socially German", they argue that the former is infinitely more valuable than the latter.

One very important aspect which this opinion piece doesn't look at is the conflict between statists and non-statists (i.e. those who (tacitly) favor the state and those who oppose it). In my personal opinion, the conflict of the state versus mankind is the biggest threat and problem that mankind is facing right now, and has been facing for millenia. Every cultural, every social, every national, every religious, every aesthetic conflict or dispute is superseded by the existence of the state as a monopolistic parasite and destroyer of mankind. The author seems to be making the implicit argument that mankind is being engineered into being an obedient statist, but he's seemingly ignorant of the fact that opposition to the state itself is becoming more formal and more widespread almost every minute.

That, however, raises questions of how much a resistance can be made across ethnic, cultural, national borders (these borders which are currently being destroyed).
Who knows, statist versus non-statist might be the last remaining criterion according to which a dissociation is possible.
 
Ok so lets see what we got here. According to this the Left´s endgame is to make everyone into a colorless sludge to avoid any distinction to erase barriers and individuality. But that seems kinda contradictory with how the Left also values individual identity, weird fairy genders, and the general worldview of "the problem is not me its THE WORLD everyone should cater to ME".

I think that if the left somehow carries that goal to fruition all thats left is eating themselves alive to preserve ideological purity.
 
Last edited:
But that seems kinda contradictory with how the Left also values individual identity, weird fairy genders, and the general worldview of "the problem is not the world ITS ME everyone should cater to ME".
The endgame of this is the complete abolition of gender and identity. To paraphrase a commentator on the right who opined on this, by introducing all those fantasy genders and identities, they want to make the very concepts as meaningless and arbitrary as possible, effectively annihilating them as a meaningful category.
According to this the Left´s endgame is to make everyone into a colorless sludge to avoid any distinction to erase barriers and individuality.
The point is that "erasing barriers" is not the end, but a means to an end, the end in question being the advancement of totalitarian global socialism. The specified barriers are making it harder for socialism to gain a foothold.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Male Idiot
The endgame of this is the complete abolition of gender and identity. To paraphrase a commentator on the right who opined on this, by introducing all those fantasy genders and identities, they want to make the very concepts as meaningless and arbitrary as possible, effectively annihilating them as a meaningful category.
But would be genderspecials be ok with that? After all they base their whole identity in their fairy gender or a cartoonish version of the gender they are larping as.
 
Ok so lets see what we got here. According to this the Left´s endgame is to make everyone into a colorless sludge to avoid any distinction to erase barriers and individuality. But that seems kinda contradictory with how the Left also values individual identity, weird fairy genders, and the general worldview of "the problem is not the world ITS ME everyone should cater to ME".

I think that if the left somehow carries that goal to fruition all thats left is eating themselves alive to preserve ideological purity.
The left is an endless ocean of contradictons, on one hand they promote/force diversity into every aspect of our society but then somehow also endorse miscegenation aka the death of human diversity. They say they care about the environment and yet they keep flooding the west with third world immigrants who polute the environment far more than the native white people ever did.
In reality the left is nothing more than " feels good " politics , they care fuck all about the long term consequences of they're actions, if something makes them feel good in the moment they'll endorse it without a second thought ( just remember all the German girls with refugee welcome signs that ended up getting gang rapped later ).
 
But would be genderspecials be ok with that? After all they base their whole identity in their fairy gender or a cartoonish version of the gender they are larping as.
The opinion of genderspecials matters not. The only thing that matters is their existence, or the perception of their existence, which is why they are being shoved into every available medium at every opportunity. By their mere (perceived) presence, the categories of sex and gender become ridiculous arbitrary relative concepts that anyone can unilaterally determine at will. By forcing inclusion, they oppose discrimination, and discrimination is a barrier against totalitarian socialism.
they promote/force diversity into every aspect of our society
I strongly disagree with this. They force diversity into everything that is evident and superficial, but they demand uniformity with their ideology, be it through the state, the "narrative", the cathedral, the intelligentsia, whatever you want to call it. A room full of nothing but white middle-aged single leftist American women is more "diverse" than this forum.
The left is an endless ocean of contradictons
Consider adopting a different set of assumptions. Your assumptions (presumably) are rooted in reality, cause-and-effect logic, purposeful behavior, logical consistency.
Leftists are not rooted in these things, they are immensely goal-oriented.
Even with the examples you listed, "they care about the environment" contradicts "flooding the west with third world immigrants who polute [sic] the environment" in your eyes
But in leftist eyes, caring about the environment means empowering the state through increased control and regulation of the economy, and flooding the west with third world immigrants means empowering the state through creating a dependent voter based for those in power, distracting the native population with cultural issues, more excuses to become authoritarian as a response to (artificially increased) crimes and so on
 
Last edited:
Ok so lets see what we got here. According to this the Left´s endgame is to make everyone into a colorless sludge to avoid any distinction to erase barriers and individuality. But that seems kinda contradictory with how the Left also values individual identity, weird fairy genders, and the general worldview of "the problem is not the world ITS ME everyone should cater to ME".
The left consciously does both of these things. They want the population to be deracinated, brown sludge and they want people to get lost in individualst causes and labels that are artificial, divisive and, most importantly, against the natural order. Both of those things work together to accomplish the same goal.

No cultural identity, no heritage, no God. Replace those concepts with manmade, nonsensical beliefs and that's pretty much leftism summarized.
 
Last edited:
According to this the Left´s endgame is to make everyone into a colorless sludge to avoid any distinction to erase barriers and individuality. But that seems kinda contradictory with how the Left also values individual identity, weird fairy genders
The left doesn't value individual identity and weird fairy genders at all, except as a bludgeoning instrument to destabilize a functioning society by destroying its pillars like the nuclear family.

If they were to attain their goal of getting to power, those fairy-gendered people would be on board trains and going straight to whatever geographical equivalent of Siberia the leftards will come up with.
 
Little does anybody realize that this time the Fourth Reich will be led by the REAL Aryans...
4EFC3EBA00000578-6047095-Shocking_Indian_MP_Naramalli_Sivaprasad_turned_up_to_Parliament_-m-32...jpg
 
Largely conservatard bullshit moaning about socialism and how similar the left and right are.
Of course political movements are similar when it comes to Power, which is their goal. Obviously the ruling party wants to impose rules and regulations on others, especially on opponents.
If one side is nationalistic and highly antagonistic to degeneracy and minorities, and another is pro-minority and degeneracy, there cannot be equivalence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Male Idiot
Largely conservatard bullshit moaning about socialism and how similar the left and right are.
Of course political movements are similar when it comes to Power, which is their goal. Obviously the ruling party wants to impose rules and regulations on others, especially on opponents.
If one side is nationalistic and highly antagonistic to degeneracy and minorities, and another is pro-minority and degeneracy, there cannot be equivalence.
Seriously?
This isn't a "leftoid vs rightoid" opinion, this is a "this is the endgame of what everyone is doing" opinion
"Nationalistic and highly antagonistic to degeneracy and minorities" maybe describes shitposters on 4chan, Discord, and Xitter at this point
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Male Idiot
"Nationalistic and highly antagonistic to degeneracy and minorities" maybe describes shitposters on 4chan, Discord, and Xitter at this point
I disagree.
Most of those groups are degenerates themselves, incel and redpill types, loli enjoyers and the sort, that simply have attached themselves like parasites to national socialism through memes because they triggered the libs. Basically none of these tards are actually ideological. Can easily be seen even in their more prominent members, like TRS/now the dead NJP, which have immediately sided with Russia in a war where Russia is explicitly purging nationalists that were destroying gypsy camps and beating up gays in Kiev.
But yes, power is obviously the endgame.
What else?
Power, wealth and resources are limited and important, and people go to war and die for them.
A story as old as mankind.
 
I disagree.
Most of those groups are degenerates themselves, incel and redpill types, loli enjoyers and the sort, that simply have attached themselves like parasites to national socialism through memes because they triggered the libs. Basically none of these tards are actually ideological. Can easily be seen even in their more prominent members, like TRS/now the dead NJP, which have immediately sided with Russia in a war where Russia is explicitly purging nationalists that were destroying gypsy camps and beating up gays in Kiev.
But yes, power is obviously the endgame.
What else?
Power, wealth and resources are limited and important, and people go to war and die for them.
A story as old as mankind.
The first point is absolutely right, none of these people have any skin in the game, nor are they even players.
The latter, though, is not obvious. Or was it immediately obvious to you that the planned invasion of Muslims was actually a maneuver to break down Muslim resistance to socialism? Certainly wasn't to me.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: AgendaPoster
Or was it immediately obvious to you that the planned invasion of Muslims was actually a maneuver to break down Muslim resistance to socialism? Certainly wasn't to me.
I don't consider that true, nor do I consider socialism a serious threat.
Arabs have a long socialist tradition and they never let go of Islam for it, nor did they abandon their their pan-Arab sentiments.
Not so sure about other parts of the planet like Pakistan or Indonesia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Male Idiot
Op's pet blogger is a fart sniffing intelligentsia retard who craftes his 69d chess without first realising that Muslims, and even non muslims, are Totally Fine with civil wars.

Sure, the (moneypeople) want brown sludge golems. True.

But a brown sludge golen won't stop a muslim from beheading it.

Ohhh nooo durka durka, this soygolem is also brown, I just gave my sister an acid bath but now I can't hurt it!

Shia/Sunni, Russian/Ukranian, Union/Dixie, Paki/Pajeet, kin wars are nothing new and this fucktarded blogger never heard of it.

This take is dumber than Chris chan. Everyone who read it is dumber for having done so.
 
Ok so lets see what we got here. According to this the Left´s endgame is to make everyone into a colorless sludge to avoid any distinction to erase barriers and individuality. But that seems kinda contradictory with how the Left also values individual identity, weird fairy genders, and the general worldview of "the problem is not the world ITS ME everyone should cater to ME".

I think that if the left somehow carries that goal to fruition all thats left is eating themselves alive to preserve ideological purity.

The left constantly wants mutually exclusive things, and it's a test of your faithfulness to the party line to be able to believe both a thing and its negation at exactly the same time.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Michael Jacks0n
The left constantly wants mutually exclusive things, and it's a test of your faithfulness to the party line to be able to believe both a thing and its negation at exactly the same time.
Like how they want to abolish the police yet also want all their political opponents in prison. There's countless examples of this.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Michael Jacks0n
Op's pet blogger is a fart sniffing intelligentsia retard who craftes his 69d chess without first realising that Muslims, and even non muslims, are Totally Fine with civil wars.

Sure, the (moneypeople) want brown sludge golems. True.

But a brown sludge golen won't stop a muslim from beheading it.

Ohhh nooo durka durka, this soygolem is also brown, I just gave my sister an acid bath but now I can't hurt it!

Shia/Sunni, Russian/Ukranian, Union/Dixie, Paki/Pajeet, kin wars are nothing new and this fucktarded blogger never heard of it.

This take is dumber than Chris chan. Everyone who read it is dumber for having done so.
Brothers are fighting. Suddenly the family is under attack by the neighbor. The brothers team up to defend the family.
The neighbors are fighting. Suddenly the neighbors are under attack by the next town. The neighbors team up to defend the neighborhood.
The towns are fighting. Suddenly the country is under attack by the next country. The towns team up to defend the country.
Different Muslim groups are fighting. Suddenly Islam itself is under attack. The Muslim groups team up to defend Islam.
To blur all the lines and distinctions seems like a valid (if completely evil) strategy to break this cohesion, no?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Male Idiot
The original articles raises some valid points, but fails on the comparison between national socialism and international socialism. While Nazi-esque tactics are used by the global elite, and while there are similarities in the economy and governance of both systems (which the article scarcely mentions), ultimately national socialism and international socialism are entirely separate because there is a spiritual difference. International socialists cannot accept the nation as a separate entity, or appreciate it on any level but an historic anachronism needing abolition since they value Marxist materialism. One's community and sense of self does not exist under Marxist materialism, since you are either the oppressed, the oppressor, or a useful idiot aiding the oppressor. That national socialism rejects this and believes the nation and community exist on a higher, spiritual level makes it wholly separate from international socialism.
One very important aspect which this opinion piece doesn't look at is the conflict between statists and non-statists (i.e. those who (tacitly) favor the state and those who oppose it).
Because you don't recognize what a "state" is. Consider that the modern leftist has weakened the state as much as many small-government rightist has. In the Third World, modern leftism has utterly decimated state power through their tools like the IMF and World Bank who strongarm countries into selling state-owned industries and properties to foreign corporations. The real players in the world today are unelected billionaires and "activists." Corporations, banks, NGOs, think tanks, etc. have far more power than any government.

Government is just a skin they wear to make themselves presentable to the people and legitimize their tyranny--it's kind of like how the medieval ritual of kings being crowned by the Catholic Church's local prelate carried on long after the Church lost its worldly power, or how all the warlords of Sengoku era Japan demanded court titles from the Emperor to legitimize themselves even though the Emperor and his court had no actual power or authority. That's why for instance that the FDA's regulatory board is just an arm of Pfizer and Big Pharma and the FCC is just an extension of big telecoms. If you abolished that, the corporations still win because they have an obscene amount of power and believe in colluding together as an oligopoly--the only thing they lose is legitimacy.

Therefore, this network of power ruling us is more or less the actual state, and every single "anti-statist" from libertarians to "'anarcho-communists" simply aim at replacing one element of the state with another since under this best definition of a state, true stateless societies are limited to tiny communes or extremely primitive tribes.
Ok so lets see what we got here. According to this the Left´s endgame is to make everyone into a colorless sludge to avoid any distinction to erase barriers and individuality. But that seems kinda contradictory with how the Left also values individual identity, weird fairy genders, and the general worldview of "the problem is not me its THE WORLD everyone should cater to ME".

I think that if the left somehow carries that goal to fruition all thats left is eating themselves alive to preserve ideological purity.
If everyone is different, than no one is. It's no different than how Hot Topic sold the image of being a non-conformist to teenagers in the 90s/00s. But somehow, every single one of these "non-conformists" looked exactly alike because they'd wear all black, saggy jeans with chains, and spiked belts.

Liberalism is ultimately a Satanic ideology about absolute liberation from everything. That means everything from governments to religion to race to gender. The final liberation in liberalism will of course be liberation from the human body itself, which is already being advocated for with the push to normalize furries, transspecies, and bestiality with concepts like "freedom of morphology." The ultimate goal in Satanism/left-hand path is to become your own god.

However, the ideology of the elite is closer to Luciferianism/secularized gnosticism (which is why it sometimes seems like a bootleg version of Christianity). They already think of themselves as God, and by breaking apart the barriers that keep us separate like race, gender, borders, etc., that means we will all be one identity and thus united with them as drones in their new world order (much as Luciferianism/gnosticism implies the ultimate goal is unity with the divine).
I don't consider that true, nor do I consider socialism a serious threat.
Arabs have a long socialist tradition and they never let go of Islam for it, nor did they abandon their their pan-Arab sentiments.
Not so sure about other parts of the planet like Pakistan or Indonesia.
Because Arab socialism in many ways is closer to national socialism. It isn't the fake "left-wing nationalism" that the modern Sinn Fein party in Ireland wants where they import a million Africans, but actual, legit national socialism. That's because despite their litany of disagreeances, racialist ideology and Western secular nationalism lays at the root of every Arab socialist tradition be it Nasserism, Ba'athism, or the Syrian Social Nationalist Party or the watered-down versions practiced in post-Nasser Egypt or in Saddam's Iraq or in modern Syria. That's why the Arab world is among the most racist places on the planet where it's Arabs at the top, whites and East Asians in number two (since they have money and fancy guns), and every other race is considered some sort of slave race. Especially blacks, they REALLY don't like blacks.

This is unacceptable in globohomo world. That's why you see them highlight the "moderate Muslim" so much, who is invariably a leftist woman who wears typical Western clothing but adds a headscarf. They also love promoting modern progressivism and grievance politics among Muslims in the West and to a degree in their own countries (like the US has spent millions of dollars funding gender studies programs in Pakistan and of course the sort of junk the US was funding in Afghanistan). Their own studies show this seems to work--the second generation of Muslim immigrants tends to be no more religious than the native population. I think a lot of the Muzzie invasion of Europe is because they want to replicate America's atomized racial dynamic but can't since the only pre-existing mudrace are Gypsies and there aren't enough of them.
 
Back