- Joined
- Dec 14, 2023
Yo when they gunna open the overview map to plot the maneuver node. I wouldn't trust myself to get the elliptical orbit without it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought we'd be drowning in drone footage.The fact that they haven't done this with 4k cameras is a crime.
C'mon man, they did a slightly better job than that. For starters there's no faces fresh from an AI Slop analogue horror.NASA animation brought to you by Bethesda Studios.
Incorrect, it hasn't glitched out yetNASA animation brought to you by Bethesda Studios.
The whole internet is a psy-op to make me believe I'm talking to real people.Do the Kiwifarms exist or is it just AI generated content?
Either option is terrible.Do the Kiwifarms exist or is it just AI generated content?
NASA animation brought to you by Bethesda Studios.
God damn this graphic of Artemis is shite. At least make it do something and show what’s going to happen. Trump needs to get his media people over to NASA immediately.
Nah dawg, SpaceX spoiled us with their footage.The fact that they haven't done this with 4k cameras is a crime.
They're professionals dude, they're using MechJeb.Yo when they gunna open the overview map to plot the maneuver node. I wouldn't trust myself to get the elliptical orbit without it
well, the cameras might be onboard but not broadcasting over the data link and they'll bring the good shit back with them.Nah dawg, SpaceX spoiled us with their footage.
There has to be a short list of who is going to land on the moon right? I’m already thinking black woman and some European because god forbid they do it the right way.
I don’t think Chantal could join so he’s out.Joshua "Null" Moon is the only acceptable choice.
Now that I think of it, I was pretty fond of my K.U.N.T.-XX (Kerbal Utilitarian Nukular Transport) series workhorse design.Factually incorrect. If this was KSP footage, it would be called the Shit Dick 69 instead of Artemis 2
16 TIMES THE DETAIL!View attachment 8792145
It just works!
This mission isn't going to land on the moonThere has to be a short list of who is going to land on the moon right? I’m already thinking black woman and some European because god forbid they do it the right way.
Very fair point, probably should have said 50 or 60 years, half a century at least. The Shuttle had a noble goal [a reusable launch vehicle able to carry largeish payloads into LEO] but it sadly ended up being, by and large, a waste of time. Plus we lost fucking two of them, one of which was very, very easily preventable [Challenger]. Columbia was honestly just kinda fucked from the moment that foam panel fell though. A rescue mission was theoretically possible if we'd understood how much the heatshield was compromised, but it would have been extremely costly.>30 years
try 50. Space shuttle was cool and had some good innovations but really when it comes to pushing the envelope on exploration it did not.