Y
YourLogicalFallacyIs
Guest
kiwifarms.net
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
I seriously don't get the idea that how hating Chris or someone else is considered this forced term known as "A-Logging". It's the stupidest term I have ever read on the Internet and all it does it just attacking people instead of the issue. Before I begin I'm not denying that A-Log is a faggot himself, but trying to make him to be worse than Chris is trying way too hard and at this point I think we should just abandon the term since it's filled with logical fallacies at this point.
Disliking Chris and wishing death on Chris is not wrong. He is one of the worst human beings I have ever seen. He peppersprayed an employee over Sonic Boom. He drove over Michael Snyder. He had sent death threats to tons of people on the Internet. With these undeniable facts right there it's no denying that Chris is fucking disgusting and trying to deny them as "A-Logging" and how "one is no better than Chris for A-Logging him" is only leading to the guilt by association rabbit-hole and all it leads to is just strawman assumptions and appealing to spite. Also, just because you think A-Logging is valid does not mean that it's true because it's there. Go read up on the appeal to common sense fallacy.
And this doesn't apply to Chris. What is wrong with joking around lolcows by wishing them death? Back in my day we used to want to wish death around bronies and furries since they're fucking scum on the Earth, but now we have to tone-police ourselves by what not to say about bronies which is really stupid. Nowadays I keep on seeing some posts being dismissed as being A-Loggish all because they wish harm on said lolcows. What's wrong with that? That's a perfectly normal response and it's useless trying to deny it.
Before I end this, please don't dismiss it just because this whole thread is shit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_lapidem
I seriously don't get the idea that how hating Chris or someone else is considered this forced term known as "A-Logging". It's the stupidest term I have ever read on the Internet and all it does it just attacking people instead of the issue. Before I begin I'm not denying that A-Log is a faggot himself, but trying to make him to be worse than Chris is trying way too hard and at this point I think we should just abandon the term since it's filled with logical fallacies at this point.
Disliking Chris and wishing death on Chris is not wrong. He is one of the worst human beings I have ever seen. He peppersprayed an employee over Sonic Boom. He drove over Michael Snyder. He had sent death threats to tons of people on the Internet. With these undeniable facts right there it's no denying that Chris is fucking disgusting and trying to deny them as "A-Logging" and how "one is no better than Chris for A-Logging him" is only leading to the guilt by association rabbit-hole and all it leads to is just strawman assumptions and appealing to spite. Also, just because you think A-Logging is valid does not mean that it's true because it's there. Go read up on the appeal to common sense fallacy.
And this doesn't apply to Chris. What is wrong with joking around lolcows by wishing them death? Back in my day we used to want to wish death around bronies and furries since they're fucking scum on the Earth, but now we have to tone-police ourselves by what not to say about bronies which is really stupid. Nowadays I keep on seeing some posts being dismissed as being A-Loggish all because they wish harm on said lolcows. What's wrong with that? That's a perfectly normal response and it's useless trying to deny it.
Before I end this, please don't dismiss it just because this whole thread is shit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_lapidem
