Thread Watch

Pretzels is the Same said:
Don't even get me started on Nick Bate hahaha.

The thing that gets me the most about Julay is how she treats her grandmother. I've worked closely with the elderly for the past 5 or so years, and just seeing their faces light up whenever their grandchildren come up... like they can do no wrong to them. Seeing someone actively treat their grandparent this way is so awful to me, especially when they know what they're doing is wrong and refuse to see it or change it. Absolutely terrible.
Click to expand...



Calm down brah. The only way you could be more A-Logish right now is if you were either telling people how ANGRY this person MAKES YOU in ALL CAPS or if you were comparing yourself to them, saying that you are so much better then them because... Because my mom says I'm special so fuck you!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: yasscat, Bokrug's Basement, The 25th Cyberman and 2 others
From : https://kiwifarms.net/threads/alex-c-leal-desertfox899.21199

LiveFromNS said:
Since he is going in to lockdown, perhaps his sister is worth chatting up! Does she know her bro is an embarrassment on the Internet yet?? Wonder when she will start getting harassed by the cool dudes?
Click to expand...

Nah. No one deserves to be harassed over this furry cuck of a brother. She's pretty normal from what I can tell, so it'd be pointless weenery.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Agree
Reactions: StanCommodore, yasscat, GandT and 9 others
gorky said:
Totally agree. However it does raise the question (for me at least) - do you think they know about it? Or has he managed to keep those bits of his life separate?
Click to expand...

My guess is that his family members are in the dark or know bits. It is hard to imagine they are completely in the dark. Baph publishing their(family's) facebook info may have brought some of the personal of Desertfox's life into theirs, but how much is still uncertain.

Either way, it would be rather weenish to tell them and involve them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: yasscat, GandT, ActualKiwi and 4 others
gorky said:
Totally agree. However it does raise the question (for me at least) - do you think they know about it? Or has he managed to keep those bits of his life separate?
Click to expand...

My guess is that they know the basics about Alex's behavior after /baph/ doxxed him and internet cool guys started getting interested, but I don't think they're aware of the full extent of his activities online. He's an adult after all, and I personally wouldn't want to go digging into a relative's online history once I heard they were a furry.

Though it does make me wonder if his parents and family are aware of his HIV+ diagnosis and his HRT. Even if he's still on their insurance, doctors won't disclose that kind of thing for adult patients. It'd be a tragedy for them to find out only once it develops into AIDS. I wouldn't wish that on anyone.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GandT, Jaiman and Dork Of Ages
SunLightStreak said:
Let's not involve family members. They don't need dragged into be in this, period.

KF has an unspoken rule about not dragging in bystanders.
Click to expand...

Ummm, but we can put the bystanders (sis, mom FB) as a link in the thread?

I agree, she didn't do anything wrong, but considering her FB was posted in this thread, I believe KF already drug her in.

I wasn't suggesting people harass her. My remark was akin to what happened to Alison Rapp. I doubt any KFs harassed her family, but someone did.

This little goofball is going to attract the weeners. The fact that a number are probably alert to the fact this thread exists, and with her FB linked in this thread (and she is noted as "fuckable"), then I think she is in for some possible grief.

So, @SunLightStreak how do you reconcile the unspoken rule of not bringing in bystanders, yet she has essentially been doxxed above?

Legit question, maybe I am missing something. It might be good to clarify this unspoken rule.

EDIT-NVM, @Dynastia to the rescue.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
Reactions: Clown Doll and ActualKiwi
Dynastia said:
No we don't.
Click to expand...

Only you get around that rule, Mr I dox people's children.
LiveFromNS said:
Ummm, but we can put the bystanders (sis, mom FB) as a link in the thread?

I agree, she didn't do anything wrong, but considering her FB was posted in this thread, I believe KF already drug her in.

I wasn't suggesting people harass her. My remark was akin to what happened to Alison Rapp. I doubt any KFs harassed her family, but someone did.

This little goofball is going to attract the weeners. The fact that a number are probably alert to the fact this thread exists, and with her FB linked in this thread (and she is noted as "fuckable"), then I think she is in for some possible grief.

So, @SunLightStreak how do you reconcile the unspoken rule of not bringing in bystanders, yet she has essentially been doxxed above?

Legit question, maybe I am missing something. It might be good to clarify this unspoken rule.
Click to expand...

Baph doxed them and Baph mentioned the fuckable part. They are not a spouse, eccentric, enabler, or a part of the rat king. They are also not his children which makes them immune to the dynastia "dox their children" loophole.

As a person who has directly and indirectly doxed a few of people mentioned on this site, I can tell you that often staff told me not to include bystanders. Make of it what you will.

Also dox has one x.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: GandT, Marvin, Clockwork Dragon and 4 others
Jaimas said:
If they're lolcows, they're fair game.
Click to expand...

The rest of his family look as normal as it gets. The "mother" turns out to be his aunt(baph really was unsure) and she has nothing but vacation photos and family photos of trips to Sydney along with other places. Remember I said in my response "a spouse, eccentric, enabler, or a part of the rat king". I should have modified the first to be "crazy spouse", but I digress.

If the site has changed this to now include all people and places, please let me know. I have had Katsu, Hellblazer, Surtur, Saney, and even Introman tell me not to include normal bystanders. Even Null bashed MapDark for dragging in a strange but seemingly normal person into a disco thread.

I have found more interesting content from people who troll the fake CWC facebook page than any of Alex's family. If someone can prove me wrong, please by all means do.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Marvin and ActualKiwi
SunLightStreak said:
The rest of his family look as normal as it gets. The "mother" turns out to be his aunt(baph really was unsure) and she has nothing but vacation photos and family photos of trips to Sydney along with other places. Remember I said in my response "a spouse, eccentric, enabler, or a part of the rat king". I should have modified the first to be "crazy spouse", but I digress.

If the site has changed this to now include all people and places, please let me know. I have had Katsu, Hellblazer, Surtur, Saney, and even Introman tell me not to include normal bystanders. Even Null bashed MapDark for dragging in a strange but seemingly normal person into a disco thread.

I have found more interesting content from people who troll the fake CWC facebook page than any of Alex's family. If someone can prove me wrong, please by all means do.
Click to expand...


I took the original comment to be bait more than anything. You might be reading a little too much into it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: chimpburgers and Ntwadumela
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back