Tim Pool - 'journalist' who claims to be a sensible centrist & sucks Sargon of Akkad's wiener; Afraid of the Milkshake ANTIFAs

The real question is, if Tim goes up on the stand, will he wear his beanie or will his beanie need to testify separately.
No hats are allowed during court proceedings (unless you have a religious or medical reason). I have to imagine they have the same rule for congressional testimony.
 
The Democrats are going to come out of all of this looking even more stupid then when they attempted to impeach him not once but twice they just can't stop beating the horse.
I think you overestimate the critical mindset most people bring to such things. A whole lot of people simply believe whatever the flashing picture box tells them to believe.
 
The real question is, if Tim goes up on the stand, will he wear his beanie or will his beanie need to testify separately.
I think Congress will allow Tim to wear a shoe.
96e.jpg
 
Last edited:
I wonder if the courts would have a case by stating that he spends nearly every day claiming we are closer and closer to a civil war
He's not wrong about that. He does overdo it, but the sorts of zero sum politics the US is engaging in can only lead to one place.

That said though the J6 committee is ridiculous. And they won't call Tim to testify because he's going to tell them to their faces that. He won't miss an opportunity to sell his grift like that and they know it. Showing these clips was just done to imply Trump knew his words would trigger violence because his alt-media mouth pieces said so.
 
I wonder if the courts would have a case by stating that he spends nearly every day claiming we are closer and closer to a civil war
No. It's not seditious to act like chicken little about a collapse. It's only sedition if he actually tries to incite the collapse

Watching him opposite the "red wedding" wacko, and Alex Jones, is like watching a retarded political version of "one of these things is not like the others." Could they find no other wackadoodle to pad their histrionic clip montage out? Tim is the very antithesis of threatening.

Showing these clips was just done to imply Trump knew his words would trigger violence because his alt-media mouth pieces said so.
If that was their intent, I feel they still did him dirty by lumping him in with the far more crazy people.
 
What if he refuses the subpoena and causes a siege? Battle of the Beanie when
His centrist stances are so stupid that he's willing to have Vaush on of all people in good faith and not even question him on his pedophilia statements
There are two types of centrists: people who try to learn as many different arguments and perspectives as they can and weigh them against their own moral compass; and people who learn as little different arguments as possible and just say whatever will both free them from obligation and get people to throw piles of money at them. Tim's more the latter case: an embarrassment to the rest of us fence-sitting fart huffers.
 

Tim giving me something to rage about again today. Starts off typical, Safe and Ready Meals, stop making fun of me for selling Safe and Ready meals, I'm not a pepper I just want 25 years worth of food just in case. The usual Tim video.

Then we get to 17 minutes in.

"Even if the people living in abject poverty all stopped having kids and disappeared after 50 years, we would still have poverty because poverty is relative."

Poverty is not relative, you Occupy Wall Street socialist motherfucker. Yes, I am poorer than you, but that doesnt make me poor.

Poverty is homelessness, drugs, crime, disease and rats and diseased rats. San Francisco is a hotbed of poverty despite being a very rich city.
There's abject poverty and relative poverty.

Abject poverty is what you're describing. It's more objective since it's based more on the ability to sustain life. U.N. puts it at anyone in the world who earns less than $1.90 per day, but there's some wiggle room depending on locality and what that actually gets you.

Relative is always the bottom X% (where X usually has some semi-arbitrary calculation). Our official poverty line in the US is relative-poverty based and it's the type the our government tends to work with because abject poverty is very low here. The OPM line is currently calculated by multiplying the estimated minimum food cost by 3. That 3 is the arbitrary bit, and can be adjusted to keep relative with the average income as needed. It is often synonymous with "poor".

Just because you don't like the way other people use the term doesn't mean it's not a thing other people recognize or use.
 
Back