- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
Tim attacks the judge in this case. Now, I have a problem with Tim calling people "evil". I think using the term evil is childish and stupid, reductive and pointless. And I think Tim uses the word 'evil' the way the left uses the word racist or fascist, basically to describe people he disagrees with rather than referencing some deeply held moral code.
But that's not what he does here. He accuses the judge, based solely of the judge stating he would have liked to see more remorse from the offending officer, of "getting off on this". Of being sociopathic and psychotic. And that is his right, he does have the right to throw around baseless accusations like this about people he's never met with zero evidence or regard for how this harms their reputations. But it's a little fucking hypocritical to hear it from a guy who talks about defamation per se as much as Tim does and from the guy who gets offended when you call him a Trump supporter after he admitted to voting for Trump.
You can disagree with someone's opinions or stance on something without resorting to ad hominem attacks the second your rebuttal begins.
12:00
"The Democrats are cheating. I will say it again: The Democrats are cheating. I will say it a third time: The Democrats are cheating. Not in the stupid way that everyone goes on about. Here's why I call it cheating: in a normal situation the Democrats will ballot harvest and lie in the media, we know how it goes, everyone is entitled to their opinion. Republicans will counter the narrative, do their own ballot harvesting, count everything up, it will be close, and then there may be some lawsuits or something else to decide how it goes. But Democrats know they can't win so they are using the power of government to silence their political opponents. That's cheating."
It's still legal, Tim. Unless it's fraudulent, you shouldn't call it cheating. You are using intentionally inflammatory rhetoric. If someone wins by cheating, no matter what the game or sport, we do not accept it. But if the Democrats win by using these tactics, you will tell everyone to calm down and that it was a fair election and there was no fraud and thus we should all just try to win the next one. So if you're going to accept the results of the election no matter what then don't call it cheating.
This is controlled opposition at its finest. Simply don't have any principles or moral center, then you can rile up your audience however you like and contradict yourself later by getting technical and saying you never said it was fraudulent. Of course, the Democrats are cheating and we should fight against it BEFORE the election but AFTER the election we just have to accept it and move on, that's how cheating works don't you know.





