💰 Grifter Tim Pool - 'journalist' who claims to be a sensible centrist & sucks Sargon of Akkad's wiener; Afraid of the Milkshake ANTIFAs

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

On 28 April, Tim had Courtney Knill, a candidate for Charlestown city council, in West Virginia, as the guest.
Elad, & Phil, were the co-hosts.

Tim made the wise choice to drop his hoodie for the 70+ degree weather, but you know he could never leave his scalp without its cover:
scalped.webp

Clip Collection:
-Tim finally does something constructive with his platform, to address his complaints about West Virginia. The beanie boy decided to have on a person running for local office, which could change the laws he complains about, so much. A little late, since Tim already made clear he planning to leave the state, but something is better than nothing. Though Tim is a bit more fidgety, today, since he appears to be playing with his wedding ring, throughout the introduction. Maybe it is because Courtney looks a little like former button-pusher, Lydia:


-Tim talks about what Courtney is looking to oppose, in her run for office, & the current situation in Charlestown, West Virginia. As her personal & campaign Facebook pages had been banned, for allegedly spurious reasons, this gives the beanie boy an opening to reveal that they asked to have Mark Zuckerberg on IRL, as he is doing the rounds on podcasts. "They gave us a formal rejection", & Tim claims this is because other podcasts, like Joe Rogan's, will not give "legitimate pushback", as would happen on IRL:


-Tim gets a super-chat about a viewer seeing one of IRL's billboards, out in the wild. The beanie boy says they have put up "a hundred" in "ten metropolitan areas, in the Midwest & the Rust Belt", for a six month period. This gives him the chance to reminisce about how people were upset by the last round of billboard advertising he did. A comment on the story, reminding us of Tim's 49-state landslide prediction for the 2020 election, gets his dander up. The beanie boy claims he was misrepresented, as "There was a meme, 49-state landslide...not a literal term", so he was joining in on that, not making an actual prediction. Because he was looking at the David Pakman subreddit for his billboard, Tim decides to take a swing at David's content as "WWE, man" & how "smarmy & unscrupulous" he is. The beanie boy goes on to say how David makes "smarmy fake-news videos to manipulate a terrified...low IQ audience". This coming from the civil war-promising, surface-level understanding, grab every expensive bauble & bad investment he can man-child, so he is in no position to throw insults:




On 29 April, Tim had Tim Young, a social media personality, as the guest.
Brett & Phil were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Tim continues to promote his upcoming live Culture War. with an audience of sixty people from his Discord:


-Tim notes that the 2008 Financial Crisis was 18 years ago, & the effects on the economy led to fewer children being born, with long-term consequences. The beanie boy argues that the reason movies & video games "are bombing" is because "there's no kids, anymore". Young notes that the main consumer of toys is adults, now. Tim proves this, by showing off the Tympole Pokémon card & figurine a friend bought for him:


-Brett notes that Generation Z sees little hope for buying a home, so they "splurge" on food, instead. Tim claims this is why they will never own homes. The beanie boy notes how younger families are being priced out of the housing market, citing the inflated costs for property, now, when compared with costs as shown in the late 1990's, on Boy Meets World. Tim bemoans how a Gen Z couple, in the area of the Branch Timidian compound, is being priced out of ever owning a home. Unfortunately, Tim does not make the connection that people like him are part of the reason real estate costs have skyrocketed, as well-heeled urbanites bought homes in more affordable areas, while still working in those big cities, or in Tim's case, running an online business:


-Tim says he is "largely indifferent" to the Trump meme coins, when asked by a super-chatter for his opinion. Brett states that he would not have made them, were he in the president's shoes. The beanie boy decides to swap the topic to leftists falsely accusing him of buying "thousands of shares, or spent hundreds of grand" on Truth Social stock:
 
Last edited:
Retink Retunk said:
Is Sleepless no longer allowed to co-host after daring to tell Tim he's not clairvoyant?
Click to expand...
Two of the core tenets of the Branch Timidian cult are:

#!: "Do not upstage thy beanie"
#2: "Do not contradict thy beanie"

Mary makes the mistake of doing both. Hannah did the same, & she was swept out from the compound. But, after not checking in on her for some time, I am happy to report she is doing well & gave birth to a child, last month.


Despite being dead-set upon not allowing guests to call into his own show, Tim made appearances upon Piers Morgan Uncensored, remotely, from the compound. He was there to discuss the recent articles of impeachment filed by Rep. Shri Thanedar, Democrat representative for Michigan's 13th district, & noted beagle abuser. Tim got to spar with the man, himself, for a good portion of the show. However, just before the end, Tim's audio cuts out. You can see Tim talking to whomever was manning the buttons at the compound, & his video cuts off, after that, with no sign of him reconnecting:


Tim alleges that Piers Morgan's staff intentionally "dropped us from the show":
short walk off a long piers.webp
(archive)

Piers responded, claiming it was an unexpected disconnection, & with it being so close to the show's wrap, they could not restore it in time:
short walk off a long piers2.webp
(archive)



Tim had Amrou Fudl, also known as Myron Gaines, of The Fresh & Fit podcast, as the guest.
Ian & Phil were the co-hosts.

Because Amrou is the guest, the topic of Israel arises & it leads to a long argument between himself & the beanie boy.

Clip Collection:
-Amrou says Ian "is moving out to Miami, soon", but Ian corrects this to just visiting, instead. Ian says he would like to be on Fresh & Fit, & Amrou approves. Wonder how that would go?:


-I am actually shocked at how nice Tim is to Ian, here:


-The Graphene Guy brings up the deportation of Rumeysa Ozturk over being a co-author of an op-ed critical of Israel, in her school's newspaper. Amrou & Ian agree that this was absurd to do, but Tim steps in to defend it as being legal under the justification of "if they pose a threat to national security". Amrou & Ian, both, state that there is a right to free speech for legal immigrants, but Tim is simply "not okay with allowing foreign people to come to our country, to dictate, by protest what we do". Phil contends that because it is not a law explicitly written to stifle free speech, it does not run afoul of the 1st Amendment. Tim says that regardless of the law, he is against foreigners coming to the United States, to protest U.S. policy, in any fashion. Amrou reminds Tim that it was not over protesting America, but Israel, & the op-ed did not mention terror groups, or even the U.S.. Tim admits it is selective enforcement, & does not like that, but "it is legal under the law". Tim makes a comparison to inviting a complete stranger into his home, to have pizza, but the person goes on to slag off a roommate. Amrou attempts to remind Tim of the prior case law, but Tim keeps harping on, about how the deportation of Rumeysa was legal:


Tim makes another comparison to a random stranger being inserted into a living arrangement that causes disruptions, "every day". Tim wants Americans to not be entangled in foreign conflicts, & focus upon "American traditions", but Amrou notes free speech is among them. Tim begins to become more agitated, as this goes on. The beanie boy keeps claiming there are different rules for immigrants, despite 1st Amendment protections not being one of them. After another comparison to someone from outside, coming in, "yelling at me", Amrou reminds Tim that this is about yelling at Israel, not America. Tim tries to compare the protests against Israel on college campuses to the use of the Turkish diaspora's votes in European elections to sway policy in Turkey's favour. This leads into the beanie boy criticising immigrants changing the original culture. Tim appeals to his deep ancestry in the United States, spare one Korea grandmother, to oppose inserting foreign "world views" that destabilise the nation. Amrou reiterates that this was a deportation over criticising Israel, & Tim still says that makes no difference to him:


Phil decides to make the leap that Amrou is wrong to claim "we protect ALL rights". Despite the fact he was explicitly talking about free speech rights. Tim decides, of all times, to look at the super-chats & gets extremely upset by someone saying how he is logically inconsistent for not asking why people are more likely to deported for burning an Israeli flag than an American one. Tim spends several minutes complaining about foreigners coming to the United States, including Canadian conservatives, telling Americans how to live. The beanie boy only wants the United States to focus upon its own affairs, not another's. Tim lists out a litany of nations, including Israel, that he wants nothing to do with. Amrou notes that only Israel gets this type of protection from criticism, & it does make people focus on this. Tim agrees, but still wants the foreigners deported should they speak out, about Israel in this case:


Ian lays out the geopolitical justification for allying with Israel, as a way to secure the Suez Canal. He starts talking about wartime exigencies, such as Japanese internment, as an example of when rights are violated for foreign policy reasons, but is interrupted by Tim. Tim, strangely, apologises for doing this, which rarely, if ever happens. After Tim lists off several other nations, such as Saudi Arabia, which received large amounts of aid, Amrou states this is, in part, to secure good relations between these nations & Israel. Tim argues that "the liberal economic order" is outdated, & the United States should return to a pre-World War II foreign policy. Tim claims the United States was "dragged in to support" allies in World War I. Which is incorrect, as the United States was not officially part of the Entente, prior to joining the war, & operated under neutrality for most of it. Tim "is confident" the United States can prosper without being the world police. When Ian mentions isolationism does not work in the age of ICBMs & long-range bombers, Tim cuts this off as "No one is saying 'isolation', it's an excuse". Which is strange because isolationism was the stated U.S. policy, before World War II. & in the period before World War I, which Tim also appeals to, saw global security for trade lanes in the hands of the British Empire, which had friendly relations with the growing United States, post 1815. Tim tries to argue that people disregard other factors to simply obsess over Israel. Amrou repeats how Israel has an outsised influence over the U.S., & its policy, which draws attention. Tim reiterates that encircling Iran & protecting Saudi Arabia's oil are the prime reasons for U.S. Middle East policy:


Amrou disagrees, & as Phil tries to explain how the Sunni-Shia divide causes friction between Saudi Arabia & Iran, Tim interrupts to ask why Amrou disagrees with his earlier point. Amrou claims Israel pushes the U.S. to fight with Iran, as they challenge Israeli hegemony in the region. Tim claims this is "circular" & explains nothing, only to pull a "So, what you're saying is". Amrou responds that while Israel does exercise influence, it is not omnipotent, as Donald Trump refused to commit to striking Iran, due to the impact that would have on the economy. This goes back-&-forth for another minute, before Tim cuts the segment to move to a new story. Ian tries to return to it, but Tim aggressively cuts him off to move along:


-Tim made the worst possible slur for Ian, "neocon on the inside, & a neolib on the outside":


-During super-chats Ian goes full Ian, by talking about how grounding & reiki make him feel connected to the stars & the core of the Earth:


-A super-chatter tries to explain the comment that set Tim off, earlier, about the double standard over deporting critics of Israel. Tim reiterates that he is against foreigner coming to the United States to talk politics, & would agree with deporting any of them, including friend of the show David Freiheit. Both sides are far more amicable, now:



On 1 May, Tim had Rudyard Lynch, of the WhatIfAltHist channel, as the guest.
Mary & Phil were the co-hosts.

Because Rudyard is as bullish on civil war as Tim is, he is given great latitude to talk & respond to questions with long-form answers.
You can tell when Tim has a guest on he personally likes, because he treats them like a guest, & not a target for expectorations from his rant.

Clip Collection:
-Tim decides to clarify that he had "no beef" with Piers Morgan, & his post was only to call attention to the problem, not make accusations of being intentionally cut from the show:


-Tim does not know how to pronounce "Doug TenNaple":
 
Last edited:
Tim Pool appeared on Triggernomentry and either he's still carrying the civil war grift or they're just taking the piss out of him.
1746386771771.webp
 
Retink Retunk said:
Tim Pool appeared on Triggernomentry and either he's still carrying the civil war grift or they're just taking the piss out of him.
View attachment 7317538
Click to expand...
Watching it now. Timmy gets so close to the issue, but he's just too dumb to get to it. And Konstantin hammered him on it.

What Konstantin wanted to hear from Timmy was that if you believe your side is correct, you are justified to do whatever it takes to implement it. But timmy could not commit fully even to his own beliefs. Simply putting the duty of crossing the Rubicon to Caesar, rather then to himself.

Very milquetoast. Tim is very good at explaining the failings of progressivism and the far left. But he's very bad at articulating the alternative and why it needs to win. He's very good at explaining why the alternative wants to fight the ruling zeitgeist, but he has no understanding as to WHY.

The WHY is very important. Modern progressivism is an infidel religion. It is a wolf amongst the herd of Christ, and the Church must destroy it, with all the moral, theological and martial authority that the Church is empowered by, The believers of it must be made to recant, and failing to recant they must be burned. So that the weeds do not choke the good seed amongst the garden of the Lord.

I see this so many times in the alt-media. They keep dancing around it, and they don't just come out and say it.
 
mindlessobserver said:
But timmy could not commit fully even to his own beliefs.
Click to expand...
I don't think Tim really has his own beliefs, I think he's the product of grunge culture that views moral conviction as crass, which is why he still tries to appeal to leftists so much as they have that sub faction of people who are nihilistic in nature but larp as having something meaningful they wish to achieve.
 
Retink Retunk said:
I don't think Tim really has his own beliefs,
Click to expand...
Of course not, he still likes to larp as a poor, homeless kid from chicago who somehow had drones, a good cellphone/plan and a streaming platform to become the "first" to livestream breaking events. Remember he invented it. Tim has been controlled since he began.
 
Last edited:
TheRaptorJesus said:
Of course not, he still likes to larp as a poor, homeless kid in chicago who somehow had drones, a good cellphone/plan and a streaming platform to become the "first" to livestream breaking events. Remember he invented it. Tim has been controlled since he began.
Click to expand...
One of the greatest crimes of the Internet age is the livestream podcast race will never acknowledge that they owe the entire format to the Sektur.
 
TheRaptorJesus said:
Of course not, he still likes to larp as a poor, homeless kid in chicago who somehow had drones, a good cellphone/plan and a streaming platform to become the "first" to livestream breaking events. Remember he invented it.
Click to expand...
Which is funny, because according to the beanie boy, himself, people recognise him more from his posts, not his "talk show":
recog.webp
(archive)

& how could they not, with such brilliant writings:
recog1.webp
(archive)

Or this:
recog2.webp
(archive)

& observations, like:
recog3.webp
(archive)

Without Tim, how could we have known that a white woman allegedly calling the World's definitively Tallest Five Year Old, & definitely calling an alleged kidnapper & rapist, niggers, would end up with "almost entirely race and ethnicity based attacks" in response. He makes Woodward & Bernstein look like Laurel & Hardy, with insights, like this.



Tim was away on Friday, 2 May ,so Phil stepped in to host IRL, with local candidate for office Courtney Knill, & National President of Young Americans for Liberty Cliff Maloney, as the guests.

Ian & Libby were the co-hosts.

Tim promised the first live Culture War episode would be happening on 3 May, so he may have been off preparing that. It has not been posted, as of this moment.

Clip Collection:
-As ever, things go much better with Tim away. My only complaint was Libby & Phil not referring to John Flynt with the correct name & pronouns:


-Ian manages to go from making a reasonable statement (that people are not accepting the labelling of MS-13 as terrorists due to Donald Trump doing it), to arguing that imprisoned gang members need to take care or else they may give MS-13 a bad name. His ability to dance from based to barmy, moment to moment, is one reason I love Our Graphene Guy:
 

Tim had Nick Adams, an Australian-American conservative media personality, as the guest.
Phil & Shane were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Tim complained about foreign conservative influencers speaking on politics, in the episode with Amrou Fudl. So, to no surprise, he decided to platform an Australian conservative advocate that moved to America:


- Nick tries to argue that "any historian worth their salt" knows "great nations" last only 250 years. This was apropos, as the Semiquincentennial of the United States happens in 2026. This appears to be a bastardisation of a claim made in a paper, written by a man named Sir John Glubb, arguing empires last only that long. However, a cursory look at Glubb's work show his examples, by his own admission, "are largely arbitrary" & seem tailored to either meet that claim, or clipped down empires into his own preferred timescale for rising & falling. So this is not a serious work, in any regard:


-When Shiloh Hendrix's fundraiser comes up, Nick & Shane take a more wishy-washy stance, claiming race relations were better pre-Black Lives Matter, the government & elites desire racial conflicts to divide & conquer, etc. Tim calls out "IDW has-beens", like James Lindsay, for condemning the support for Shiloh. Tim sees this as representative of their not wanting the right to react, in any meaningful way, to the years of leftist overreach. Tim says that he does not want Donald Trump to do un-Constitutional acts in response to it, though, the left has, is, & will eagerly violate that same Constitution, when in power:


Tim continues to reiterate how he does not not want Trump to take extra-Constitutional actions, but govern as normal, & "go golfing". However, the president is being mired down by universal injunctions, which Tim regards as an abuse of power by the courts. While the beanie boy expects Congress to act, the legislature is not responding to address the judicial wrongs, & so he does not see an answer, or "how we go anywhere, but into separation, divorce, conflict":


-Tim complains that Republicans do not agree with his 2nd Amendment absolutist stance, covering personal ownership of NBC weapons. The Beanie Boy considers "psychological manipulation", as he claims people like Brian Tyler Cohen do, are a greater danger. Which is a little surprising considering Tim's past in the South Side of Chicago, & how much damage the urban market can already do with standard firearms. I can only surmise Tim does not fear radiation poisoning, as his scalp is already barren:


-Here is a clip to show how Tim is a man with an eye for quality. A few months ago, the beanie boy saw a video of a robot doing acrobatics & contemplated spending around $2000 to get one. I am a bit saddened he did not, because the same robot model had a malfunction which saw it swinging fists at the people around it:


-Looks like the new jacket was part of a sponsorship, @TheRaptorJesus. Not sure if they mandated he & Phil had to wear it, though:
 
Prööt :DD said:
Tim Pool is bald and I would not have sex with him.
Click to expand...
Correct on both counts. But putting them together leads to the unfortunate implication that were he not bald you then would have sex with him. Tim Pool does not become attractive by making him hairy.

JamesWebbSlinger said:
Tim had Amrou Fudl, also known as Myron Gaines, of The Fresh & Fit podcast, as the guest.
Ian & Phil were the co-hosts.

Because Amrou is the guest, the topic of Israel arises & it leads to a long argument between himself & the beanie boy.
Click to expand...
This is actually the reason I came to this thread. I don't follow Tim Pool though I'm aware of him, but I have just become aware of Myron after his appearance discussing the Shiloh Hendrix case on Piers Morgan in which he could not stop laughing. So I clicked on his channel, saw his "debate" with Tim Pool and wow - Tim Pool is terrible. He's like a re-issue of Ben Shapiro - same trained rapid speaking style, same ardent Zionism behind a flimsy facade of "I don't care", same high and nasal voice. Myron talked one tenth as much and convinced a hundred times more. I think I should study how he handled Tim Pool, tbh.

Retink Retunk said:
I don't think Tim really has his own beliefs, I think he's the product of grunge culture that views moral conviction as crass, which is why he still tries to appeal to leftists so much as they have that sub faction of people who are nihilistic in nature but larp as having something meaningful they wish to achieve.
Click to expand...
At his heart he is still a Leftist mindset. In his rant in the discussion with Myron, he kept appealing to moral relatavism with things like "in his own country he is morally right, but when he comes here he is not." A true Rightist would have the view that something is right or wrong independent of what the society around you thinks. And he keeps arguing morality from law in that discussion, rather than law from morality which betrays a lack of actual conviction in his professed beliefs.

And there's nothing he can do about those tells because that's how he actually thinks.
 

Tim had Amber Duke, senior editor at The Daily Caller, as the guest, once again.
Libby & Phil were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-You can always count on Tim to know what he is talking about, after his 16-hour long work days. Tim asks what side the United States is on, in the India-Pakistan clashes, at first, but does admit to doing "a quick Google search" to become appraised on the two nation's history. Though the rest of the panel is no better informed:


-Tim brings up the claims made by Catherine Austin Fitts, a Secretary of Housing & Urban Development in the first Bush administration for one year, that the government spent $21 trillion to build underground spaces for the elites to live in, between 1998 to 2015. While not believing in cities being built, he asks "Why wouldn't they", noting locations like Raven Rock, because he loves Fallout 3 so much. Libby questions this, but Tim asserts that due to her experience in the Bush administration & "cited a few other people" that agreed with her analysis of missing funds from the Pentagon budget:


-During a discussion about troons being banned from the U.S. military, Libby adds that Robert DeNiro's son trooned out, recently, & Phil mentions a meme comparing DeNiro's son to Clint Eastwood's. Phil claims DeNiro's child looks like an "obviously insane person", while Eastwood's looks "normal". If it is the one I think it is, Phil may not have caught it was meant to be critical of miscegenation. Which makes it all the funnier he said this on Tim "mixed race" Pool's show:
 
Last edited:
Retink Retunk said:
Tim Pool appeared on Triggernomentry and either he's still carrying the civil war grift or they're just taking the piss out of him.
View attachment 7317538
Click to expand...

mindlessobserver said:
Watching it now. Timmy gets so close to the issue, but he's just too dumb to get to it. And Konstantin hammered him on it.

What Konstantin wanted to hear from Timmy was that if you believe your side is correct, you are justified to do whatever it takes to implement it. But timmy could not commit fully even to his own beliefs. Simply putting the duty of crossing the Rubicon to Caesar, rather then to himself.

Very milquetoast. Tim is very good at explaining the failings of progressivism and the far left. But he's very bad at articulating the alternative and why it needs to win. He's very good at explaining why the alternative wants to fight the ruling zeitgeist, but he has no understanding as to WHY.

The WHY is very important. Modern progressivism is an infidel religion. It is a wolf amongst the herd of Christ, and the Church must destroy it, with all the moral, theological and martial authority that the Church is empowered by, The believers of it must be made to recant, and failing to recant they must be burned. So that the weeds do not choke the good seed amongst the garden of the Lord.

I see this so many times in the alt-media. They keep dancing around it, and they don't just come out and say it.
Click to expand...
Finally watched it now, so three days late on this, but honestly, I don't think the issue is Tim doesn't get it. I think he does; but he realizes that if he straight up says "Yes, my side is right, so we should be allowed whatever powers I think are 'necessary' for solving issues the way I want. But because the other side is wrong, they should not be allowed access to such powers.", everyone will (rightfully) call him a hypocrite, naive in the best of cases and retarded in the worst, and it will significantly affect his grift as well as how a lot of his milquetoast viewers perceive him.

When Konstantin asked him whether he would be ok with his ideological opponents also using such power, and he dodged it as best he could. Clearly he does not want his opponents to have such powers, but he can't say that. Which is ironic because his whole argument was "make laws and distribute powers based on morals, not principles." Well, his ideological opponents DO NOT HAVE THE SAME MORALS! So he should be able to beat his chest and say they shouldn't have access to such powers." because they don't have the morals he does.
But normal people would see that's BS, because the opponent would just go "He did it, so should I!" (which even Tim kinda did, with pointing to Biden and the others did with Trump) and then argue that Tim or his guys should not get to use their powers because HE DOESN'T HAVE THEIR MORALS. And Tim would completely disagree with that. One of the reasons government and legal systems try their best at adhering to principles over morals. (How well it actually works is a completely different question). But Tim wants /hisguy/ to have power which the /otherguy/ should not, so he says otherwise, then can't actually stand by that thought.
Furthermore, as Konstantin said, a lot of people do not consider this manipulation to be "4th/5th/6th gen warfare" (operative word being warfare) and thus would not necessarily support Timmy on the "Give Trump more power because media manipulation is warfare!!" front. And him comparing giving Trump extra powers over this to Lincoln and the Civil War is MUCH more retarded. Especially since other historians DO say that Lincoln suspending habeus corpus or arresting legislatures WAS dictatorial. The main disagreement being, were such actions justified due to the imminent war.

All in all, the whole thing was Tim going "I want /myguy/ to do what he wants because we're good, but the /otherguy/ should not be able to, because he's bad." and not being able to stick that because he couldn't admit it's based on "us good, them bad." since, as I said, saying as such would affect his grift and make him look like a hypocrite, naive and/or retarded.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom