🐱 Twitter changes strategy in battle against internet trolls

CatParty
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-battle-against-internet-trolls-idUSKCN1IG2HK


SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Twitter Inc on Tuesday revised its strategy for fighting abusive internet “trolls,” saying it would use behavioral signals to identify harassers on the social network and then limit the visibility of their tweets.

San Francisco-based Twitter, known for freewheeling discussions since it was founded in 2006, has been trying to rid itself of harassment out of concern that personal attacks were driving people away.

Twitter’s rules already prohibit abuse, and it can suspend or block offenders once someone reports them. Users can also mute people they find offensive.

Chief Executive Jack Dorsey said Twitter now would try to find problematic accounts by examining behavior such as how frequently people tweet about accounts that do not follow them or whether they have confirmed their email address.


Tweets from those accounts will appear lower in certain areas of the service, such as search results or replies to tweets, even if the tweets themselves have not been found to violate any rules.

“We want to take the burden of the work off the people receiving the abuse or the harassment,” Dorsey said in a briefing with reporters. Past efforts to fight abuse “felt like Whac-A-Mole,” he added.


Tweets will not be removed entirely based on behavioral signals, Dorsey said.

In tests the new approach resulted in a 4 percent decrease in abuse reports originating from search results and an 8 percent decrease in abuse reports from the conversations that take place as replies to tweets, according to the company.

Most abuse comes from a small number of accounts that have an outsized impact, said Del Harvey, Twitter’s vice president for trust and safety.

Social media firms including Twitter and Facebook are under pressure to remove bullies, many of whom target women and minorities. Many women cannot express themselves freely on Twitter without fear of violence, Amnesty International said in a report in March.


Reducing abuse could also help Twitter’s business. If more people sign up and spend time on the service, marketers may buy more ads on it.

Dorsey said that Twitter’s 336 million monthly active users should expect a series of other changes over the next several months as the company explores ways to encourage tweets that are more civil.

In March, Twitter sought proposals from academics and others to help gauge the “health of public conversations.” Dorsey said the company is reviewing 230 submissions it received.
 
I'm not very confident about policies that target "trolls" when being a "troll" apparently merely involves disagreeing with a tranny about anything at all.

problematic accounts

>even using the word "problematic"
commit suicide Jack.

Is anyone else happy that these crazy motherfuckers have adopted such a weird, cultic set of propagandistic re-defined words that they literally identify themselves as if they were wearing Stars of David, but instead of David, it's Stars of Moron?
 
In tests the new approach resulted in a 4 percent decrease in abuse reports originating from search results and an 8 percent decrease in abuse reports from the conversations that take place as replies to tweets, according to the company.


*FACEPALM!*

They haven't accomplished shit aside from telling a computer algorithm to push these "problematic" tweets lower down the totem pole. They are getting less reports because they made the "problem" less visible.

Even if Twitter is a company that acts in complete good faith, this is still a dumb idea.
 
Stop. Just stop. Why does assessing what 60 year old college professors think and propose immediately become the qou?
Don't forget that when they're referring to "academics and others" they're really not referring to a bunch of dusty, old men buried in sheaths of ancient tomes about the evils of electricity and the finer points of proper chalkboard maintenance. That long-necked oddity Mike Isaacson was an "academic" and even a college professor, and it's much more likely than not that he's the sort of "expert" they consulted with on this decision.

The Twitter "shadow-ban" has been around for more than half a year anyways, so it's kind of funny for them to come out and admit that it exists and that they're "rolling it out" into the general public now, when for the longest time they swore up and down that their company did no such thing and everyone talking about it was just being paranoid.
 
The Twitter "shadow-ban" has been around for more than half a year anyways, so it's kind of funny for them to come out and admit that it exists and that they're "rolling it out" into the general public now, when for the longest time they swore up and down that their company did no such thing and everyone talking about it was just being paranoid.
It's obvious. When you have adspace youll immediately shift your stances and rules to abide to the ad's lessee, because Bud Light doesnt want to be on the side bar when some maniac is trooning out.
 
I hope everyone is learning a valuable lesson on what happens when the litmus test for behavior is not what's illegal vs legal, but whats woke vs problematic..... as you can see, NOTHING has gone wrong AT ALL with policing with your feelings and not that tired old uncaring LAW.
 
Amazing how they think it's trolling that is causing their company so much problems and not the retarded website itself and the ideological bias.

"BUT THEY LET GOMALD AND OBAMA ON"

Yeah but on the non-celebrity level they purge right wingers and anti-sjw types.
 
Most likely they aren't doing anything and this is just PR to try and keep their "woke anti-free speech" crowd coming back for that ad revenue.
And I doubt this will affect the checkmarks, that's what the checkmark is there for. You're above the rules because you make the site look good to investors.
 
Lol good
I already abuse their current algorithm to fuck with people and this makes it easier.
See, being a good dindu nothing account is worth it.
Now I can drive them crazy by getting them shadow banned.
*i don’t do this for lolcow because no content is bad but for my own personal cows because it amuses me.
 
Back