Business US judge rejects Visa, Mastercard $30 billion swipe fee settlement - Squeeze no more, merchants.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
By Jonathan Stempel
June 25, 202410:48 AM CDT Updated 11 min ago
Article

Jew Graph.JPG
A screen displays the company logo for Mastercard Inc. on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, U.S., February 29, 2024.

NEW YORK, June 25 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Tuesday rejected a $30 billion antitrust settlement in which Visa (V.N), opens new tab and Mastercard (MA.N), opens new tab agreed to limit fees they charge merchants who accept their credit and debit cards.
U.S. District Judge Margo Brodie in Brooklyn concluded that she was not likely to grant final approval to the settlement, and therefore denied the plaintiffs' request for preliminary approval.
Her decision could force Visa and Mastercard to negotiate a settlement more favorable to merchants, or go to trial.

The settlement announced in March was intended to resolve most litigation that began in 2005 over so-called swipe fees, also known as interchange fees, that merchants pay to accept Visa and Mastercard, and which the card networks set.
Those fees totaled about $72 billion in 2023, according to the Nilson Report. They generate profits for bank and other card issuers, which funnel many of the fees into rewards programs that encourage consumers to spend more.

Many merchants and retail trade groups viewed the fees, typically 1.5% to 3.5%, as excessive.
They also objected to rules forbidding merchants from telling customers why some cards cost more than others, and steering them toward cheaper cards.
Critics also say the fees lead to higher prices for consumers, who are now sometimes charged less for using cash.
The settlement called for the average swipe fee to fall at least 0.04 percentage points for three years, and stay at least 0.07 percentage points below the current average for five years.

Visa and Mastercard also agreed to cap rates for five years and remove anti-steering provisions, while merchants got more discretion to offer discounts or impose surcharges.
Several trade groups, including the National Retail Federation, objected to the settlement.
They said the relief for merchants was small and temporary, and made it difficult for them to mount future legal challenges, while still letting Visa and Mastercard dictate swipe fees.

Some U.S. senators have promoted legislation, the Credit Card Competition Act, to let merchants use other payment networks to process Visa and Mastercard transactions.
The rejection does not affect a separate $5.6 billion class action swipe fee settlement among Visa, Mastercard and about 12 million merchants.
A federal appeals court in Manhattan upheld that accord in March 2023, seven years after throwing out a $7.25 billion settlement that short-changed some retailers.

The case is In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, No 05-md-01720.

Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York
 
Good. That settlement wasn't pain and a fix, it was a nuisance removal fee.

The settlement called for the average swipe fee to fall at least 0.04 percentage points for three years, and stay at least 0.07 percentage points below the current average for five years.

Oh no! 0.07 less profit on our already existing, already amortized, no maintenance lines! And it's not even permanent, it only lasts for 5 years! How will we ever decorate our solid gold toilets with a 3rd layer of diamonds now?

What a joke, I'm glad some judge smacked them down.
 
Good. That settlement wasn't pain and a fix, it was a nuisance removal fee.



Oh no! 0.07 less profit on our already existing, already amortized, no maintenance lines! And it's not even permanent, it only lasts for 5 years! How will we ever decorate our solid gold toilets with a 3rd layer of diamonds now?

What a joke, I'm glad some judge smacked them down.
I hope that judge won't die of "suicide" or "accident". Btw, memo to Visa and MasterCard as the Joker might said:

And I think the Joker would agree on this one.
 
Many merchants and retail trade groups viewed the fees, typically 1.5% to 3.5%, as excessive.
Are these the same faggots that are going "cashless"?

Critics also say the fees lead to higher prices for consumers, who are now sometimes charged less for using cash.
Being charged less for using cash is the way it's meant to be isn't it? Why should those not using the services of these providers have to pay those fees?
 
Back