Feedback Varying levels of ratings

[CatParty]

Each rating should have varying levels in order to accumulate point values. I propose a ten point system per rating in order to give weigh and value per rating. When reading posts a user can ask themselves "on a scale of 1-10 how much of a winner is this post?" Or "on a scale of 1-10 how autistic is this post?"
Then we post rating leaders based on their point tallies.

 

[Golly]

Only if the leaders get titles like "Feels Master" or "Drink Lord".

 

[Doc Cassidy]

I want to be able to rate thing pluswinner or doubleplusdumb.

 

[BILLY MAYS]

I rate this :autism::autism: out of :autism::autism::autism::autism::autism:

 

[BV 937]

Ehhh IMO I think that the rating system should only be one click to rate a post, otherwise it would just be such a hassle that it wouldn't be worth it. That's not to say that the system can't be improved, however. But think, if a post has 20 winners and five autistics, what would the winners mean if they were all 2/10, and the autistics where 10/10? It honestly wouldn't even be worth rating something 2/10 winner, as if it was that underwhelming or shitty of a post it would just get rated as a like, agree, autistic, or dumb.

 

[Un Platano]

I thought the way ratings work is that you just rate everything you see autistic. Amount seems pretty irrelevant for that system.

 

[OtterParty]

you miss being relevant dont you

 

[Feline Darkmage]

"Drink Lord".

@Hellblazer

 

[BillionBisonBucks]

Only if there's a limitation of ten points per post, and the single-click default is 10/10. I've seen plenty of posts that were 90 percent winner and 10 percent autistic, and would welcome more granularity to make this site more of a ridiculous timesink.

 

[ICametoLurk]

you miss being relevant dont you

You're implying he was ever relevant.

 

[EI 903]

@Hellblazer

Were I a less lazy man, I would take a selfie of me in a Michael Flatley pose holding two vodka bottles. Alas, laziness makes completing even the simplest of tasks