Welcome to Your Nightmare: The Externalization of the Agentic State - The Agentic State is an instrument for an even tighter control of all activities on earth, and a dream come true for every aspiring dictator who wants to play god

https://drjacobnordangard.substack.com/p/welcome-to-your-nightmare-the-externalization

archive link: https://archive.is/NWkTR
- - -

Jacob Nordangård

Jul 15, 2025


In October last year World Economic Forum opened the Global Government Technology Centre (GGTC) at GovTech Campus Deutschland in Berlin with the mission to “accelerate the digital transformation of government” together with “founding partner”, French IT-consultant Capgemini. The latter is an aspiring “global leader in Agentic AI-powered Intelligent Operations”.

The initiative is a part of WEFs network Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and the ongoing technocratic world revolution, and fulfills G20's goal of developing a Digital Public Infrastructureto accelerate the Sustainable Development Goals (an initiative launched during India's presidency in 2023).

Why they chose Berlin—a city with such a troublesome history regarding governmental totalitarian control—one can only speculate. But it is fitting.


The goal is to “make the GGTC the global platform for driving GovTech forward.”

GovTech is developed to improve the “efficiency, transparency, and responsiveness of government operations and public services”, which also happens to be an integral part of Donald Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

GovTech Campus Deutschland is a collaboration between the German Government, German state agencies, the science community, and is also supported by the Eclipse Foundation.

Founded as the Eclipse Project by IBM in November 2001, with support from a consortium of software vendors, it builds on a dark legacy regarding the company's role in providing “GovTech” (punched cards) to Nazi Germany (as described in Edwin Black's book IBM and the Holocaust: The Strategic Alliance between Nazi Germany and America's Most Powerful Corporation). Strategic member companies include IBM, Microsoft, SAP, Oracle, Huawei, Fujitsu, Bosch, and Red Hat.

The GovTech they will now provide is something the Nazis could only dream of. The technological development has since changed the game and created the conditions for a control state with chilling consequences for the freedom of mankind.

GGTC have since its founding started another center in Kiev, while the technocratic role model country, the United Arab Eremites, has been affiliated as a “founding partner”.



Both Ukraine and UAE can be viewed as WEF vassals and are testing beds for GovTech solutions, with GGTC as a contributor to the Ukrainian Digital State UA (a Global Platform for Digital Solutions and GovTech Innovation).

The Agentic State​

The Global Government Technology Centre recently released a white paper called The Agentic State which outlines a vision for an AI-governed future. Main author is Luukas Ilves, a Stanford University graduate who is the Chief Information Officer of the Government of Estonia, and the founder of the Tech Green Pledge, “a network of tech companies committed to combatting climate change”.

The Agentic State is basically a recipe for large scale population control with little or no human agency. As stated in the paper,

The Agentic State signifies a fundamental shift in governance, where AI systems can perceive, reason, and act with minimal human intervention to deliver public value.

The choice of title is quite revealing.1 The Agentic State theory, coined by psychologist Stanley Milgram after his famous conformity tests, states that,

…the essence of obedience consists in the fact that a person comes to view themselves as the instrument for carrying out another person's wishes, and they therefore no longer see themselves as responsible for their actions. Once this critical shift of viewpoint has occurred in the person, all of the essential features of obedience follow.2

According to the International Organization for Standardization, “an AI agent can be broadly defined as an entity that senses percepts (sound, text, image, pressure etc.) using sensors and responds (using effectors) to its environment.”3

The technocratic manual describes ten “functional layers” of government ordered in three dimensions.

Operations

1. Service Delivery, From fragmented portals to self-composing public services and
   personal concierges.
2. Internal Workflows, From manual casework to outcome-driven agents with humans on the loop.
3. Data Governance, Management, and Operations, An operational asset for agents and a strategic asset for society as a whole.
4. Crisis Response and Resilience, From legacy responses to agentic readiness in an era of polycrisis.

Regulation and Governance

1. Compliance and Reporting, Continuous compliance that preserves confidentiality and
   supports lighter regulation.

1. Policy and Rulemaking, From static rulebooks to living policies, continuously monitored
   and adapted by AI agents.

Foundations

1. Leadership, The skills and behaviours of outcome-driven government leaders
   who will build agentic states.
2. Workforce and Culture, Towards broad tech fluency, elite talent, and high-performance culture.
3. Tech Stack, Leapfrogging to tomorrow’s enterprise stack.
4. Public Procurement, How Agentic AI redefines how governments buy and what they get.

Polycrisis management​

Of these, the chapters on “Crisis Response” and “Compliance” are of utmost importance in understanding the diabolical nature of this new governance regime.

The white paper concludes that our world isn’t prepared or equipped for “a world of cascading geopolitical, technological, environmental, and social shocks.” A phenomenon that is labeled as a polycrisis.

This polycrisis scenario is essentially what actors like climate tzar and frequent WEF-attendee Johan Rockström constantly has warned about.4 As described in the paper:

We are in an era increasingly characterised by polycrisis: interconnected and cascading shocks ranging from pandemics and extreme weather events to cyber-physical attacks, financial instability, disinformation campaigns and even conventional warfare — traditional crisis management models are under strain. Threat actors are already adapting. With AI, they can automate, scale, and personalise attacks at unprecedented speed. Governments, by contrast, are often still operating with institutional reflexes shaped for a slower, more linear world.5

But this can be countered with the deployment of “intelligent systems”.

Agentic government means equipping the state with intelligent systems that can anticipate, respond, and adapt across the entire crisis lifecycle: from prevention and preparedness to response, recovery, and continuous learning.6

A part of this is “simulation infrastructure” with the claimed ability to predict the future. Everything we do will be analysed and simulated with the help of “virtual twins”.

Agentic models can continuously simulate crisis scenarios across domains, producing synthetic datasets that reveal systemic fragilities. More than stress tests, these simulations become generative foresight mechanisms.7

If a problem is detected, this could trigger a “hyper-aware AI-orchestrated first response”. As described in the report,

When a crisis begins to unfold, AI initiates the first steps in crisis response before human-in-the-loop structures have time to react. These agents will work alongside increasingly autonomous physical systems such as drones and robots, forming the backbone of a responsive, adaptive crisis infrastructure.8

This is starting to border on a science fiction dystopia. Just like Skynet in The Terminator, the machines will take the first step in order to solve the crisis, while predetermined protocols will ensure cohesive and coordinated crisis management.9

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch...053-5d8f-4659-bf3f-e1b97a1db3d5_1500x750.jpeg
This echoes the proposed United Nations Emergency Platform, which has been advocated by Johan Rockström and the Mary Robinson-led Climate Governance Commission.

Human agency will take a back seat. The authors states that,

Human oversight will increasingly move from making decisions to supervising them. This shift may feel uncomfortable, but those who let machines take the first step, especially in fast-moving situations, will gain an edge, with mental capacity freed up for critical thinking under pressure.10

They are damn right that it feels uncomfortable!

Another part of the Agentic State with likely chilling consequences is “Compliance and Reporting”. This concerns the scan of live data and real-time compliance checks.

Compliance monitoring and reporting is one of the most obvious cases for agentic AI. Instead of depending on quarterly reports or scheduled inspections, a statement of conformity becomes a live reflection of the present. Compliance is no longer a retrospective snapshot; it is an active, up-to-date status. A well-governed AI compliance agent, running on a verifiable, tamper-resistant algorithm, could issue YES/NO compliance attestations without transmitting sensitive internal data.11

What can possibly go wrong? “No more hiding” as WEF-trustee Al Gore said in his sales pitch video to the project Climate Trace.

The Agentic State is an instrument for even tighter control of all activities on earth, and a dream come true for every aspiring dictator who wants to play god.

In this model, reporting becomes proof, not just paperwork. With more precise, real-time monitoring and verifiable reporting, regulators could cautiously recalibrate requirements toward socially optimal levels. In the long run, we can envision a situation where compliance in domains like health, safety, financial, environmental, cybersecurity, and ethics become a component of overall quality management, with less, not more, internal information crossing organisational boundaries.12

In other words, “either you obey or you face the consequences”. But the authors actually ask some valid questions about needed safeguards.

If AI agents can issue fines or trigger legal action in real time, what safeguards are needed to prevent runaway enforcement or unjust penalties? What role should human oversight play in preserving legitimacy?13

But this comes without the obvious conclusion of shutting down this totalitarian nightmare before it runs amok. A world with agentic AI in charge will lead to a dramatic change in how we are governed.

Laws, currently static code written once and amended rarely, can develop into a far more dynamic living system, continuously interpreted, tested, and refined by agents operating within clearly defined public mandates.14

This means that an AI agent “will have the capability to rewrite laws as easily as agents rewrite code.”

AI agents can simulate complex systems, run policy scenarios, test and red team alternative designs at staggering volume and speed; where quantum computing will unlock a further leap. Moreover, AI can course-correct ‘at runtime’, detecting drift, bias, and systemic failures.15

This new system will leave human legislators only to define “broad societal goals”, “while specific rules, thresholds and requirements are adjusted dynamically by agents with limited or no human intervention”! The question is who will be tasked of overseeing the goals for the Agentic State?

The authors rightly conclude that this new regime of “challenges contemporary notions of inclusion and participatory decision making” but don’t think it has to be “less democratic”.

So how do they think democracy and citizen participation should be accommodated?The solution has a bitter taste of cold logical technocratic efficiency, as it basically means that we humans will be connected to a cybernetic system that can detect and analyse human responses and adjust its decisions based on the feedback loops. As described in the paper,

Rather than operating solely through top-down regulatory adjustments, agentic policy systems could also learn from citizen signals. Feedback loops, such as appeals, time-to-resolution metrics, or even emotion detection in digital interactions, could become inputs for agent-guided policy refinement. In this model, the boundary between policy implementation and adjustment becomes porous: agents adjust rules not only based on macro-level KPIs but also from bottom-up input and friction indicators.16

The White Paper essentially confirms the techniques that will be used to govern the global technocratic regime described in my books. Below is my take on of how this new world system will ultimately work with GovTech as an integrated part, and the United Nations as the definer of “broad societal goals”.



The World System, from my book Temple of Solomon.

A briefing about the white paper was held July 1, 2025, where the authors presented and discussed how agentic AI will transform government operations.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Order my book Temple of Solomon from Pharos Media.

1
Thanks to the reader who shared the video and drew my attention to the connection to Milgram's theory.
2
Stanley Milgram (2020), Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View, Harper Perennial Modern Classics
3
World Economic Forum (2024), Navigating the AI Frontier: A Primer on the Evolution and Impact of AI Agents, White Paper, December 2024
4
Thomas Homer-Dixon, Ortwin Renn, Johan Rockström, Jonathan F. Donges, and Scott Janzwood (2022), “A call for an international research program on the risk of a global polycrisis”, cascadeinstitute.org/technical-paper/a-call-for-an-international-research-program-on-the-risk-of-a-global-polycrisis/; Climate Governance Commission (2023), Governing Our Planetary Emergency, earthgovernance.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Governing-Our-Planetary-Emergency-Report_WEB.pdf
5
Global Government Technology Center (2025), The Agentic State, How Agentic AI Will Revamp 10 Functional Layers of Government and Public Administration, p. 20
6
Global Government Technology Center (2025), p. 20
7
Ibid.
8
Ibid.
9
Global Government Technology Center (2025), p. 21
10
Ibid.
11
Global Government Technology Center (2025), p. 22
12
Global Government Technology Center (2025), p. 23
13
Ibid.
14
Global Government Technology Center (2025), p. 24
15
Ibid.
16
Ibid.

 

[General Emílio Médici]

I hate the Antichrist

 

[Vitrealis]

I hate the Antichrist

I don't hate him because there are several functions in the bodies and minds of humans that come from this entity. We're able to reason and have bones thanks to him, for example. At the same time, I do hope humanity is able to choose the Christ being and overcome slavery by this entity, which is his goal for humanity; bind us to him and have complete power over us.
We're constantly receiving aid from the spiritual realm. I think in the end we will overcome this challenge.

 

[Private Tag Reporter]

take your meds

 

[TrinityReformed]

>AI/LLM dick sucking
Overhyped as usual.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

I'm relieved that it's the Euro-cucks they're testing this out on.

While this tech is inevitable, at least the massive bureaucracy of the EU will slow it's roll out a bit as each and every level of bureaucracy tried to dip in on the fun.

We're going to have to fact the fact that sooner then we'd like the elites will be able to track and spy on everyone all at once.

Who watches the watchers was from a time before AI

 

[One Angry Computer]

Very of the WEF to think that all countries on Earth are going to be willing to partake in the same AI government control system... when UN bodies are considered a laughable, powerless eunuch by many nations, and they can (and had) ignored UN rulings before.

The more realistic result is that many competing governments will have their own agentic systems, making them dumber just by the nature of fragmentation, and in some cases, worse than human-ran bureaucracies.

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

Capgemini has been around since AI was a twinkle in a researcher's eye. The fact that they rebranded to make themselves seem trendy does not mean one world government is close at hand, get a grip

 

[ZazietheBeast]

Since the WEF are playing that NWO game, here's something very appropriate and was made in the 90s.

Would be extra hilarious if their own security forces turn on them. Good luck in making Abdul and Ubuntu from not acting like shitskins in their own countries.

 

[Lonjil]

I clicked the "Introducing Climate Trace" video and wow lmao. "We don't actually know where our greenhouse gas emissions come from". Am I crazy or have we been told non-stop for decades about how greenhouse gases are causing climate change? Now we are not even sure where the emissions come from???? The whole fucking point of green energy push was because they claimed we were putting out too many greenhouses gas. Am I retarded or is this next level gaslighting?

 

[Martian High Command]

I've played Deus Ex, I'm ready for this.

 

[Archie_Kimkicker]

Agentic is such a LinkedIn word that I want to hatecrime everyone that uses it.

 

[Vitrealis]

Very of the WEF to think that all countries on Earth are going to be willing to partake in the same AI government control system... when UN bodies are considered a laughable, powerless eunuch by many nations, and they can (and had) ignored UN rulings before.

The more realistic result is that many competing governments will have their own agentic systems, making them dumber just by the nature of fragmentation, and in some cases, worse than human-ran bureaucracies.

I wish I shared your optimism in this regard, but after seeing what happened with the scamdemic, where almost every country on Earth marched along the UN and WHO's music, I'm not too sure if this won't turn into a second round of that.

I hope we've learned our lesson, though.

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

Aw sweet, a schizo thread!

 

[No-Eyed Square Guy]

I wish I shared your optimism in this regard, but after seeing what happened with the scamdemic, where almost every country on Earth marched along the UN and WHO's music, I'm not too sure if this won't turn into a second round of that.

I hope we've learned our lesson, though.

They've learned that the plausibility of The Science™ (whatever a chatbot is made to shit out) and the sanity of its (their) demands are irrelevant. Almost everyone will obey, and the pool of volunteer enforcers is far larger than the number of resisters. At the moment of their choosing, civilization ends forever. Probably.

Author is a weird nerd who collects evil corporate jargon like a porn hoarder.

 

[tehpope]

That's cool and all. But where's the power for all this AI shit gonna come from? Renewable energy isn't gonna cut the mustard. Are the WEF et.al gonna do a 180 on nuclear energy? What is going to happen when people start protesting this shit because globalist have raised several generations to be anti nuclear energy and pro green energy?

 

[Vitrealis]

Author is a weird nerd who collects evil corporate jargon like a porn hoarder.

He's a great researcher. I'm very grateful to him for covering this and other important stories.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Its just LIBERALISM.

It drives me nuts trying to explain this too people. It is the Liberal State, working as intended. Using the basic presupposition that "All men are created equal."

The Liberal State, as the stand in for God, voted for by the sovereign people BECOMES God. If you didn't want this to happen to you, you would not vote for it! But you do! So its okay! Your benevolent overlords can go to sleep at night knowing that you have agreed with your sovreign franchise to have the chains heaped on your head.

You are watching the end stage of the Liberal Revolutions, the American, French, Glorious, Russian, Chinese etc, reach their nadir. The apotheosis of their triumph and you wonder WHY. Monarchists back in the 18th century TOLD you why. Equality is a lie. Democracy is a farce, and the only result of the Liberal revolutions will be the destruction of society to be be replaced by petty tyrants who don't oppress you for fickle means, they oppress you because you WANT TO BE OPPRESSED.

If you didn't want to be oppresed, what are you going to do about it?

You will do N.O.T.H.I.N.G.

None of you will do a damn thing. You will larp all day about how you will fight tyranny, but you will never take a unilateral step. And anyone who does will swiftly be killed by the State, or thrown in a hole. And you will call that person a retard. All of you won't do shit, unless a King takes up the sword and commands you to collective action. This forum is itself a microcosm of this truth. None of us would be here without Null, yet because Null is willing to fight, we are willing to back him and are pulled in his wake. This is fundamental human nature.

Nobody is an Island unto themselves, and Liberal Theories concept of the individual as a sovereign entity is perhaps the most pernicious weapon of control ever inflicted on the mind of man. Because it is a LIE. No one man can change the world, and no one man, not even a King, can rule alone. This has been known for millennia and yet somehow we decided too forget this along with the idea that Men and Women are not the same.


May as well post my autistic screed again.

Thread 'The End of Liberalism as a political philosophy.'

May 2, 2024

I will preface this post by saying I am basically doing a deep thunk on something that has been bothering me for awhile now, and has only just started crystalizing in my head. So this post should be read not as a "definitive articulation", but more me throwing a theory out there in the bar over a beer, to see if it lands. If it does, a part of me kinda wants to actually do the full research and write a book.

PART I. Introduction and summarized history


Recently, I made a post in a the happenings thread about the recent bout of campus protests over the Israel-Hamas war...

• mindlessobserver
• Replies: 157
• Forum: Deep Thoughts

• 
• 
• 

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

Why are you showing me some eccentric guy's blog?

 

[TORtlEMUStRaNSUS]

There are two wolves inside of you
One hates the Antichrist
The other has diagnosed schizophrenia.