What does python taste like? Because it could be slithering onto our dinner plates. - own nothing. live in the pod. eat the snakes

What does python taste like? Because it could be slithering onto our dinner plates.​

A study conducted on two snake farms has found that breeding pythons for meat is more energy and resource-efficient than current livestock production, offering a viable protein alternative.​

By Sascha Pare published [March 15th, 2024]

Python meat is a low-effort and sustainable protein alternative that could soon slither onto our dinner plates, scientists suggest.

The researchers argue there are a plethora of benefits to farming pythons, including the snakes' ability to fast for extended periods of time, their low space and water requirements and minimal waste production.

Due to their large body size and fast growth rates — and without legs or wings to worry about — pythons are a highly efficient source of meat. The scientists published their findings Thursday (March 14) in the journal Scientific Reports.

"These animals are extremely good converters of food and particularly protein," study co-author Patrick Aust, a zoologist and research associate at the University of Oxford in the U.K., told ABC News. "Literally, they are specialists [at] making the most of very little."

Python farming is well-established in Asia but is yet to take off in other regions, according to the study. With current livestock production systems struggling to meet sustainability standards and growing demand, however, it may be time to consider alternatives.

"Over the last two decades, snake farming has expanded," the authors wrote in the study. "Reptile meat is not unlike chicken: high in protein, low in saturated fats, and with widespread aesthetic and culinary appeal."

The researchers monitored the growth rates of newborn Burmese (Python bivittatus) and reticulated (Malayopython reticulatus) pythons at two farms — one in Thailand's Uttaradit province and the other in Ho Chi Minh City, in Vietnam. Despite receiving food only once per week, both species grew rapidly and put on up to 1.6 ounces (46 grams) per day over a period of 12 months — by which time they can be slaughtered for meat, skins and other products. Female pythons grew larger than males, likely due to natural sex differences.

The researchers fed the pythons a variety of diets, including thawed frozen chicken, wild-caught rodents, fishmeal, chicken pellets and waste products from pork production.

Roughly a quarter of the food ingested by the snakes was converted to meat, regardless of which diet they were fed, and 82% of the snakes' body mass was edible meat by the end of the experiment. For comparison, the meat harvested from cattle generally amounts to about 63% of a cow's weight.

"In terms of food and protein conversion ratios, pythons outperform all mainstream agricultural species studied to date," the researchers wrote in the study. "Production efficiencies for pythons were higher than those reported for poultry, pork, beef, salmon, and crickets."

Pythons also maintained their body mass during periods of fasting that lasted as long as 127 consecutive days thanks to their flexible metabolism. Adult Burmese and reticulated pythons can weigh more than 220 pounds (100 kilograms) and females can produce up to 100 eggs per year, meaning they are "well suited for commercial production," according to the study.

The researchers highlighted the potential role of python farming in controlling rodent pests and upcycling waste products from other meat industries and agri-food supply chains, if the snakes are fed a diet rich in rodents and waste protein.

The only remaining hurdle to putting python meat on dinner plates is a limited understanding of how to keep thousands of these snakes in captivity, the authors wrote — that, and "the general fear humans have toward snakes."
 
probably tastes good
but i really don't see how the fuck snake farming is supposed to be more efficient than cattle or swine farming? snakes are obligate predators who need to eat meat, and pythons are big snakes so they need big prey. you need a whole prey animal farming operation to sustain the python farm. how is that going to be cheaper than just feeding corn to cows?
 
but i really don't see how the fuck snake farming is supposed to be more efficient than cattle or swine farming? snakes are obligate predators who need to eat meat, and pythons are big snakes so they need big prey. you need a whole prey animal farming operation to sustain the python farm. how is that going to be cheaper than just feeding corn to cows?
the math only makes sense if you use waste product, thats why they are feeding chicken nuggies to those snakes.,
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
Can we trick them into eating rats?
We already have something more palatable.
1710522239832.png
s
 
Turtle or Tortoise is a way better option, as is alligator, as far as flavor goes. Snake is always tough, and too lean to cook well. Turtle is the best tasting of the reptiles, but a lot of work to get not much meat. Alligator you really only eat the tail, which can be a lot of meat, but most of the animal is a waste. The real money is always in the skins, alligator and snake alike, the meat was always a secondary market for exotic jerky.

I rather doubt growing snake is "more efficient" than just letting a cow eat grass, though. "Efficiency" is one of those things that is very easy to manipulate by playing with statistics, or redefining words to fit your agenda. Such as here, where "Per pound of food, snake puts on the most meat" sounds efficient, until you learn the "food" is something hard to come by or requires a whole other industry, like growing clean rodents fed on grain to then be fed to snakes, while the cow just needs useless grass.

I doubt snake can be grown by the million in captivity, period, and I doubt a million aquariums each packed full of a 1000 pound python is anywhere near as humane as just letting cows wander on pasture. Plus salmonella is way more common in reptiles than in chicken. You'd have to medicate those snakes constantly and the whole farm would need to be covered in bleach-water 24/7, which has its own health concerns. And snake manure is horrid, worse than chicken manure. It takes ages to weaken enough to be viable as fertilizer.

Still, even given all that, snake meat is certainly more viable a food source than the various vegan fake-meat or those lab-grown meat ideas you see trotted out by people stupid enough to have invested in those things.

Realistically though, it'd be easier and cheaper to just grow more grass for cattle via hydroponics, and use that to supplement feed a herd. With extra grass to supplement them, you can easily raise five or more cattle per acre of pasture, and cattle actually like living in a close herd with each other, so it isn't remotely inhumane to them. And grass-fed beef is the best meat there is, both for taste and nutritional value. Plus cattle have the best manure, after rabbits, so that's a bonus as well.
 
Back