UN What Is Going on at Machu Picchu? - Protesters blocked access to the Incan site in Peru over a new ticketing system. Tourists have been evacuated, but there could be more unrest. Here’s what to know.

machu.png
The railway line to Machu Picchu, the ancient Incan fortress in Peru, was blocked by protesters over the weekend, trapping some tourists. Credit...Carolina Paucar/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Hundreds of tourists were stranded near Machu Picchu, Peru’s most-visited site, over the weekend after demonstrators blocked railway and bus routes to the site and shut down local shops and restaurants in Aguas Calientes, the gateway to Machu Picchu, in the country’s Cuzco region. Some visitors posted videos on social media pleading for help. The police evacuated about 700 tourists on Saturday. Many left without seeing the site.

The protesters had taken to the streets on Thursday to demand the government rescind a contract that allows a company to sell tickets to Machu Picchu for the first time. Tickets had previously been sold through the office of culture in Cuzco, which is controlled by the regional government.

Protesters agreed to a 24-hour “truce” on Tuesday to take part in talks with government officials. While Machu Picchu is officially open, train service to Aguas Calientes and buses that take tourists to the citadel remain suspended. The U.S. Embassy advised travelers who want to try to reach the site by other means to make sure they take enough food and any medicine they might need.

Machu Picchu, believed to be a 15th-century getaway for Incan royalty, received some 2.2 million visitors last year, below prepandemic levels of 4.6 million. Peru has been trying to encourage tourists to visit other ancient sites in part to prevent overcrowding, which UNESCO has warned could damage parts of its structure.

Who is protesting and why are they angry?​

Protesters include tour operators, guides, activists and residents in the region of Cuzco. They are opposed to a private company profiting from sales of tickets to Machu Picchu and claim that the company, Joinnus, an events marketing platform, was chosen to administer the sales last year through a corrupt deal with the culture minister, Leslie Urteaga, which she denies.

Elvis La Torre, the mayor of Aguas Calientes, said that the government did not consult local authorities or residents about the new online system.

Distrust of the government of President Dina Boluarte runs deep in Cuzco, a heavily Indigenous region with countless pre-Columbian ruins. Ms. Boluarte took office in late 2022 after her predecessor was ousted and arrested after trying to dissolve the Peruvian Congress, prompting widespread nationwide protests that she responded to with crackdowns that left 49 civilians dead, mainly in Indigenous regions.

What is the government trying to do?​

The government says the new ticketing system aims to make sales more transparent. It alleges that “mafias” with ties to the regional government of Cuzco divert a portion of tickets to sell them on the black market, depriving public coffers of revenue and making it harder to measure the true number of visitors to the site.

The government is also trying to implement a “dynamic” system where the daily limit on visitors changes throughout the year.

The company that buses tourists to Machu Picchu routinely reports higher numbers of tourists per day than the official ticket sales, according to the tourism commission in Congress. The national comptroller’s office found that over 2021 and 2022, 70,000 to 80,000 visitors to Machu Picchu had not been counted by the regional culture office, representing a loss of about $2 million per year.

Where do the negotiations stand now?​

Protesters want the culture minister to resign and the contract with Joinnus to be rescinded. On Tuesday, the culture ministry announced that it would move the new ticketing system to a platform administered by the central government, with input from the regional government of Cuzco.

Ms. Urteaga said it would take “a prudent period of time” to transition to a new, state-run system. “We cannot return to the previous system,” she said on X, formerly Twitter. We must have a secure, transparent and objective platform.”

Joinnus said it would agree to end its contract early.

Mr. La Torre, the mayor, proposed updating the regional government’s online platform for selling tickets to ensure transparency. “We’ll agree to modernizing the system of sales of the culture ministry,” he said in a video posted online, but only if the process was “transparent” and “communicated to stakeholders.”

It was not clear if demonstrators would resume their protest after the truce ends at midnight on Tuesday.

Hasn’t this happened before?​

Peru is rife with social conflicts, and it is not unusual for residents in rural regions to block roads to draw media attention to their demands and pressure authorities to negotiate.

In the past decade, protesters have blocked railway access to Machu Picchu several times as part of efforts to secure higher salaries for teachers and health workers, lower fares for rail service, or assistance for farmers during an acute fertilizer shortage.

In late 2022 and early last year, tourism in much of southern Peru, including Machu Picchu, halted for several weeks during political unrest after Ms. Boluarte took office.

Article Link

Archive
 
Machu Picchu, believed to be a 15th-century getaway for Incan royalty

First time I've ever heard this claim.

I guess all monarchs everywhere are assholes.

Given the article was from the NYT, but I read TFA and thought it didn't do a good job explaining the two sides of the protest besides "a new ticketing system".
 
It's a truly impressive place, one of my favorite memories of my peru trip was hiking up there on a crisp fall morning. The only other place that I've seen a sky that blue was in the Himalyas and maybe in the Gran Tetons. If you ever have the chance to go, I highly encourage it. There's quite a few ruins around that haven't been systematically evaluated by archaeologists yet. Ask your guide, most of them know a few places.

First time I've ever heard this claim.

They've thought this for a few decades now, sounds plausible. It definitely wasn't built as a fortress, it's indefensible and getting supplies up there would be a nightmare.
 
Facts: tickets to MP are controlled by a local mafia, that not only makes them expensive but makes the process chaotic. This is a fact, not an allegation.

Authorities want to lend the management of the tickets to Joinnus, the mafias are mad that they'd lose a significant income, hence they're making people protest saying they want to privatise MP or sell it to foreign corporations.

Protests like this have halted tourism in the South region. It's taken by leftists and they don't care to starve their populations or make them lose income. Some even want people to die to blame the government.

The truth is that Peru doesn't have capacity to have a local industry for many things and we can't but lend to foreign participants to deal with it. The left protests over this without realising many times the reason is that leftists governments make it hard to set up new businesses, while the right doesn't care if it's US or China doing the work as long as produces money.
 
There is some bitching in the USA about similar setups - see people complaining that Booz Allen or whoever controls and sells access to national parks.

What often happens is the department of the government has a budget for the project of about five dollars and a dead rat, so they make a deal with the provider where the provider gets paid out of a percentage of fees collected. So instead of $10m upfront and $1m a year, it’s nothing upfront and 10% of ticket price.

People bitch about it but it’s not terribly bad on the face, and at least brings the corruption (if any) to a more modern aesthetic.
 
Too many people are visiting, that's why they are implementing a control system.

The very stones underfoot are being worn away by the 100,000 people visiting every year. It's the same with the Pyramids and many other heavily visited tourist sites across the world. Hell even Mecca has new rules due to so many pilgrims coming to see it.

It also doesn't help that many tourists are fuckin dumb asses who deliberately damage these history sites for Instagram views or simply want to take a chunk of history home with them. I will admit I laffed when that dude fell 1000+ ft after he tried to break off a piece of that famous Tibetan monastery. Fuck around and find out that 1 million views means shit when your splattered across a few hundred sqft.

As always it's the dickheads that ruin things for everyone. If people were respectful of the sites this wouldn't be such a problem but to me at least it seems like the newer generation are just a bunch of asshats who never think past their own immediate desires.
 
Authorities want to lend the management of the tickets to Joinnus, the mafias are mad that they'd lose a significant income, hence they're making people protest saying they want to privatise MP or sell it to foreign corporations.
Serious question: the article says the government says they're losing 70000-80000 in ticket sales. 80000 of 2.2M is 3.6%. This is on the scale of card processing fees. I don't know how much this Peruvian company takes, but Ticketmaster supposedly eats 30% in fees. How is this an improvement?
 
I'll bet the locals have sacrificed at least a dozen tourists, which kind of reduces wear and tear on the surroundings.
 
Back