What is objectively the best mass effect 2

Testacles Maximus

the best of times is now
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 7, 2022
I think it’s mass effect 2 legendary edition. It has all the dlc baked right into the game from the get go plus improved graphics and character creation. It has the most interesting characters and side missions, and the possibility of failing the final mission adds some stakes not seen in other games.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Begemot
Zaeeds DLC

Zaeed is the only great thing in all of Mass Effect, you god damn son of a bitch

The fact that Bioware decided not to use his original mob heist recruitment mission will forever be a travesty.
 
Last edited:
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Begemot
I'm more of a Dragon Age fan but the devs are so fucking autistic that I'm actually dreading the fourth game.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Table Country
Undertale 2
Sexytime options - Way better
RPG score - ++
Funny - Trololololo
Exclusive soundtrack by Masafumi Takada - Preordered bitch.
 
Mass Effect 2 is fun to play.

If I had any major complaints-it’s no Samara romance, the loyalty missions get stale once you’ve done them a dozen times, and the suicide mission becomes easy to game once you know how to do everything right. Thus losing its punch when you are playing the first time.

(Though if your trying to get certain outcomes in ME3 you have to game it right).

Excellent soundtrack, though the combat lacks the Hollywood action style of the third game and the forward focused aggressiveness of the first game. (I actually like in ME1 charging into pirate bases and feeling like I’m a spec ops badass).

Within the overall story of Mass Effect-ME2 develops the two subplots of the genophage and the quarian Geth conflict, and sets up their resolutions in the third game. The reapers however become more of a problem-with the collectors as simply reaper proxies(that are themselves actually not fought that often), people have different feelings on how it treats the reaper’s motivations, I personally think it’s fine. I can understand why people think otherwise though.

I don’t think ME2 is a diversion per se, or that it is unnecessary. I do think the problem ME3 had was finishing the main plot and the two major subplots(along with wrapping up the characters of the virmire survivor, any romance options, and tertiary stuff like the rachni) with all of ME2 characters both one-shafted to more minor roles, and two having to ensure they were included.

As someone who has played the ME trilogy probably three dozen times(I know nerd) I think a lot of the criticism the games receive is somewhat unfair. The story is actually fairly consistent and generally explanations are given. Even for things that are a bit cringe like Cerberus’ role in ME3-an explanation as to why is made.

As for ME2 though-beyond my earlier complaints, it also lacks the crew interaction that ME3 and definitely andromeda has. Everyone pretty much just sits in their room. Which sure yeah it’s a bunch of professionals many with death wishes of some sort-so not a lot of camaraderie but it does get more noticeable.
 
I don’t think ME2 is a diversion per se, or that it is unnecessary. I do think the problem ME3 had was finishing the main plot and the two major subplots(along with wrapping up the characters of the virmire survivor, any romance options, and tertiary stuff like the rachni) with all of ME2 characters both one-shafted to more minor roles, and two having to ensure they were included.
Sort of a necessary evil that they wrote themselves into. All the fucking characters it was possible to kill off in ME 1 and ME2 meant they couldn't really write with the expectation that say, Moradin was actually alive and so he had to get too old to hold a gun on missions out of nowhere. I'm just glad they brought back Wrex for a pretty big role even though most people probably got him killed off in ME1.
As for ME2 though-beyond my earlier complaints, it also lacks the crew interaction that ME3 and definitely andromeda has. Everyone pretty much just sits in their room. Which sure yeah it’s a bunch of professionals many with death wishes of some sort-so not a lot of camaraderie but it does get more noticeable.
ME3 was just as bad as ME2 in that regard except on the Casino DLC. All of the sudden everyone went from staring out the windows to quipping and riffing off each other in Tarantino/Whedon fashion, it made me sort of sad because it was actually fun and entertaining unlike most Tarantino/Whedon dialogue and there was almost none of it in any of the rest of ME3.
 
The best Mass Effect 2 is... Mass Effect 2... Um. Is this one of those retard tests like "Who's in Grant's Tomb?"

The big mistake they made with ME 2 was with the Arrival. In the end the player should have been able to make the choice on whether to fire the rockets that causes the asteroid to destroy the gate. I know narratively it would have made the writer's job much more difficult going into ME 3, but it was way too important of a choice not to give the player. The player had many other smaller choices that had impacts on the story. That choice, obviously, was far more impactful, and was taken away from the player. I vehemently disagree with that decision.
 
Last edited:
Back