What is war good for?

Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg

True & Honest Fan
Person of Interest
kiwifarms.net
Joined
May 9, 2016
On the outside chance there are people who can discuss this topic rationally and intelligently, I'll compose it here.

1646888447655.png

Mary Davidson
You would think in the 21at century we would have worked this out.


Tommie Jayne Wasserberg
War is the oldest racket in the world. Prostitution was probably invented to serve soldiers. Dwight Eisenhower had this vision and struggled with the MIC for his entire post war career to retool for peacetime projections of American military technology for constructive purposes. JFK got killed for trying to carry that forward.

1646888617939.png
 
You know what? I'll bite.

Ya see Tom to answer your question of 'What is war good for?' all you have to remember is that humans are stupid animals that love to fight. We use any excuse from 'they encroached on our land' to 'this mob destroyed my pastry shop' along with religion and politics to make a sloppy stew of bullshit. Add in a heaping dose of capitilism and boom!, you've got a recipe for a species that's been having wars since two fuckers fought over a squirrel carcass. It's the only constant in human history and it defines us more than anything else and will subsequently be the end of us all.

...Not that any of this applies to you. You'll probably be dead before that.
 
Last edited:
Henri busquets described it as how a vital civilization tests and baptized its youth. War is a gift to the ascendant generation to prove itself and to ensure that the waste and excess is burned away. for him it was a forest fire where the dead weight is purged and the forest at large becomes healthier. Practically, It was a way for powerful and affluent families to eliminate worthless and wayward sons.

unfortunately we stopped doing this. We started to ensure only poor people died in war rather than allowing the natural purging of family embarassments.

If only busquets advice had been heeded during Vietnam. Sabrina and lady would have never been traumatized
 
Remember when Tommy used to lie being hardcore black ops in third generation?
No.If you're referring to my claim of being third generation antifa, that was all in the open. numerous relatives served in WW II and my family remained opposed to fascism.
You know what? I'll bite.

Ya see Tom to answer your question of 'What is war good for?' all you have to remember is that humans are stupid animals that love to fight. We uses any excuse from 'they encroached on our land' to 'this mob destroyed my pastry shop' along with religion and politics to make a sloppy stew of bullshit. Add in a heaping dose of capitilism and boom!, you've got a recipe for a species that's been having wars since two fuckers fought over a squirrel carcass. It's the only constant in human history and it defines us more than anything else and will subsequently be the end of us all.

...Not that any of this applies to you. You'll probably be dead before that.
My contention is that human nature in general tends toward cooperation and peaceful coexistence and that they have to be fear conditioned to hate to the degree that they go out and commit mass murder. Very little has changed in all of recorded history besides the sophistication of population management methodology and the implements of mass murder. Otherwise, the world is divided up into church/state fiefdoms ruled by predator capitalist oligarchs in constant competition for hegemony over the world's economy. Many authors think the same dynastic families have been racketeering in blood since the time of Nimrod. The actions of several dozen European families have left their bloody footprints all over the map since the 9th century in Khazaria , now the Ukraine, with the same shit going on as always with the people paying the bills with their lives.

Humans can be aggressive and violent and peaceful and cooperative all at the same time; arguing for a natural state of cooperation or a natural state of conflict is missing the boat. But humans sometimes are both aggressive and violent. Why do we see aggression flare up in so many contexts?

One simple answer is that we are highly social and complicated beings—we spend most of our time around other people. Our big brains, imaginative minds, and super complex social lives often cause interpersonal conflict, confusion, and resentment, to which we sometimes (but not always) respond with aggression and violence. We have to negotiate potentially hundreds of social interactions each day. Most of the time this goes well; sometimes it does not. Because the diversity of individual needs and desires do not always gel with social, political, and economic realities, interpersonal conflicts emerge. Across human history, though, more often than not people have found a way to get along (even if it is more a consequence of social pressure than personal desire).
 
My contention is that human nature in general tends toward cooperation and peaceful coexistence and that they have to be fear conditioned to hate to the degree that they go out and commit mass murder.
You know what Tom? I'll give you that. Not an A+, sure, but that's a mostly valid point.
 
No.If you're referring to my claim of being third generation antifa, that was all in the open. numerous relatives served in WW II and my family remained opposed to fascism.
Fuckin' babykillers. You descend from babykillers, that makes you a babykiller. And a babyfucker too, I guess.
 
No.If you're referring to my claim of being third generation antifa, that was all in the open. numerous relatives served in WW II and my family remained opposed to fascism.

My contention is that human nature in general tends toward cooperation and peaceful coexistence and that they have to be fear conditioned to hate to the degree that they go out and commit mass murder. Very little has changed in all of recorded history besides the sophistication of population management methodology and the implements of mass murder. Otherwise, the world is divided up into church/state fiefdoms ruled by predator capitalist oligarchs in constant competition for hegemony over the world's economy. Many authors think the same dynastic families have been racketeering in blood since the time of Nimrod. The actions of several dozen European families have left their bloody footprints all over the map since the 9th century in Khazaria , now the Ukraine, with the same shit going on as always with the people paying the bills with their lives.


Thomas hush no one wants to read your blabber.
 
Henri busquets described it as how a vital civilization tests and baptized its youth. War is a gift to the ascendant generation to prove itself and to ensure that the waste and excess is burned away. for him it was a forest fire where the dead weight is purged and the forest at large becomes healthier. Practically, It was a way for powerful and affluent families to eliminate worthless and wayward sons.

unfortunately we stopped doing this. We started to ensure only poor people died in war rather than allowing the natural purging of family embarassments.

If only busquets advice had been heeded during Vietnam. Sabrina and lady would have never been traumatized
You were doing real well up until your false assumption that they were traumatized. Is there some reason you feel compelled to say stupid, untrue and insulting things to me?

What country before ever existed a century and half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure. Our Convention has been too much impressed by the insurrection of Massachusets: and in the spur of the moment they are setting up a kite to keep the hen yard in order. I hope in god this article will be rectified before the new constitution is accepted.2 https://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/tree-liberty-quotation
 
Back