- Joined
- Jul 23, 2022
I can only find modernized versions online
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not in my price range. I might be able to eventually afford it, thoughDo you have about 1700 dollars?
View attachment 3574997
![]()
Common Prayer + NT - 1662 - BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER + NEW TESTAMENT + THE WHOLE BOOK OF PSALMS - Historic Bibles & Engravings
1662 BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER + NEW TESTAMENT + THE WHOLE BOOK OF PSALMS. Octavo. V.RARE. Genuine First Edition 1662 CAMBRIDGE ed., rarer than the London ed. Printed by John Field for Cambridge University, 1662. NT Reference: Herbert 682. RULED-IN-RED throughout. BCP Title in facsimile and lacking...historicbibles.com
I think they sell this at my local bookstore, although I'm still enclined to look elsewhere. If other options are unavailable, I will buy this Oxford Classics print of the BCP 1611.
You could use this one as a reference to check other hardcopy editions as well. I think they sell a hardcover version too but it's quite a bit more expensive.I think they sell this at my local bookstore, although I'm still enclined to look elsewhere. If other options are unavailable, I will buy this Oxford Classics print of the BCP 1611.
It is partially because paperbacks cannot lie smooth on a desk, which is important for prayer, and because Oxford Classics often suffer from poor binding.
Do you have about 1700 dollars?
![]()
Common Prayer + NT - 1662 - BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER + NEW TESTAMENT + THE WHOLE BOOK OF PSALMS - Historic Bibles & Engravings
1662 BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER + NEW TESTAMENT + THE WHOLE BOOK OF PSALMS. Octavo. V.RARE. Genuine First Edition 1662 CAMBRIDGE ed., rarer than the London ed. Printed by John Field for Cambridge University, 1662. NT Reference: Herbert 682. RULED-IN-RED throughout. BCP Title in facsimile and lacking...historicbibles.com
Sorry, I was referring to an unrevised BCP which preserved it's distinctive archaeisms. I am just hoping to purchase a modern reprinting, made by one of the better Anglican synods so that I could use it for prayer. I've found that Anglicans have very good devotational materials.Rare book nerd here. I actually had one of those at one point (sold years ago, sorry, otherwise I'd be happy to offer a reasonable price to a Kiwifren). My usual hunting ground for antique books is AbeBooks. There are a lot of retarded dealers on there who blindly follow stuff that's been lol-priced by autopricing bots and left to rot, but if you're patient and willing to ship internationally if need be, you can still get some good deals. Depending on your budget and the exact details of what you're willing to accept in an edition, it could take you some years, but you will likely catch your prey eventually.
You can also check eBay, but most of what's up there is either trash condition, or priced wildly unreasonably by sellers who don't understand that the appraised value is almost never the market value. Still, once in a while, a good deal will turn up.
Amazon is 98% worthless for actual antiques, as most legit dealers don't sell there, and prices are heavily botted.
If you have access to a bookbinder who will work for reasonable rates, a trick is to buy what's graded as a "binding copy" -- those are specimens with missing or trashed bindings (or page sewing), but with otherwise Fair or better page blocks. If you're lucky enough to find a binding copy with strong sewing, and you're willing to put a non-fancy cover on it that's glued to the spine, rather than corded through (called "cased bindings" or "wraps", NB that the latter are usually a type of softcover, but not always -- usage isn't consistent), you can really save some money, and have the satisfaction of rescuing a book that is harder to sell and at risk of eventually being destroyed.
I noticed you said that the ability to open the book fully flat is critical to you -- I would warn you before you spend a ton of money on a 300+ year old copy that most of those will not be able to lie completely flat, especially not without having to force it and potentially damaging the spine permanently. Some of that is due to fragility and age drying and tightening up the organic materials its made from, and some of it is due to either intentional style or a lack of skill on the part of the sewer and binder who put it together in the past. Out of everything I've handled, only my copy of Aquinas's Summa Theologiae from the early 1600s will willingly lie completely flat, and that's likely because it's a large-sized specimen that appears to have been bound for church use 400 years ago. Books sewn and bound in such a way as to lie fully flat typically command a premium, as they're the minority and usually quarto sized or larger.
A much more attainable, safer (to the book), and cheaper solution, is to buy a cradle for whichever copy you end up getting your hands on. Finding copies that will lie mostly open, but not fully flat, are much more widespread (cheaper), and it's better for the book itself. They come in a variety of shapes, sizes, and materials, but in general they look like this:
View attachment 3575434
One more point while I'm rambling -- antique books do require maintenance and special handling. If you've never owned any before and want tips, feel free to ask and I'll gladly sperg. Or you can ping the Special Collection department of your nearest university library and ask them for advice, too.
JFC, those have gone up in value since the mid 2000s, if they ever actually sell at that price. I saw the market starting to rise about 10 years ago, but still. Glad most of what I'm after these days isn't north of 250 years old, and if it is, it's a manuscript and fuck that market, facsimiles all the way for those.
Sorry, I was referring to an unrevised BCP which preserved it's distinctive archaeisms. I am just hoping to purchase a modern reprinting, made by one of the better Anglican synods so that I could use it for prayer. I've found that Anglicans have very good devotational materials.
They get really expensive before 1700, I've noticed. You can get religious tracts from the 1700s for a few hundred, but any popular/well-known work from before 1700 is going to be 4 figures now, if not 5 figures. I'd love to own some of the Catholic religious tracts written when Catholicism was illegal in England, but we're talking just a few dozen (or fewer) copies in existence.
Early American printed works are also pricey, like the 1785 Douhy-Rheims bible printed in Philadelphia.
I did have questions on maintenance. As I have at least one volume that might be considered antique (technically two, but they're different editions of the same book). It's the 6th edition of John Guilim's A Display of Heraldry, published in 1724. It's a rather large book, and it's missing the backing to its spine. The covers are entirely removed from it, and I've noticed that, when handling it, an orange-colored substance rubs off. I'm guessing that's probably the remains of some sort of glue or adhesive that's dried over time. Regardless, what would you suggest, in terms of preservation?One more point while I'm rambling -- antique books do require maintenance and special handling. If you've never owned any before and want tips, feel free to ask and I'll gladly sperg. Or you can ping the Special Collection department of your nearest university library and ask them for advice, too.
I did have questions on maintenance. As I have at least one volume that might be considered antique (technically two, but they're different editions of the same book). It's the 6th edition of John Guilim's A Display of Heraldry, published in 1724. It's a rather large book, and it's missing the backing to its spine. The covers are entirely removed from it, and I've noticed that, when handling it, an orange-colored substance rubs off. I'm guessing that's probably the remains of some sort of glue or adhesive that's dried over time. Regardless, what would you suggest, in terms of preservation?
Thankfully, aside from the issue with the boards and backing, the spine itself is still intact, and one can even open it without issue. Though I still avoid touching it, for obvious reasons.