Who would you support: WEF or feral niggers?

Title


  • Total voters
    23
What's the difference?
 
All whites will bend the knee wit tears in they eyes, ho....
You have no choice
You are foul creations of yakub and Esau...
 
What's the difference?
1707377008972.jpeg
Feral niggers are pro-property rights. They can’t steal your property if you don’t own nothing like WEF wants.
 
Last edited:
feral niggers need the big city gibs, lax law enforcement, and big cities with large populations of sheep-like victims to survive. Feral niggers barely know whats happening a mile away from them, and can spend their whole lives inside their 'hood' which consists of less than a full square mile as long as there's a liquor store, a nike store, and enough white liberals to carjack when the ebt runs out.
Wef fuckery on the other hand, will come for you, even hundreds of miles away from the large population centers. they cannot abide people living freely outside their grasp, so they will buy off the government officials and police to bring you in line.

I think the poll would be much closer if there was some sort of time frame where you were required to live in the world each would bring about.like 'would you rather be stuck in the worst part of detroit michigan for 1 month, or spend 1 month in a WEF 'utopian' bughive
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charred Dinosaur
The WEF are just a bunch of people that want to do better which have a bad reputation because of a few memes. So them

I don't give a lot of credit to the "majority are benign, it's the minority causing problems!" theory.

In black communities, why don't the name and shame the troublemakers, even when they burn down the place?
In governmental entities, why doesn't the "good" side of the FBI or CIA do anything about their evil, corrupt co-workers?
And in the WEF, if most billionaires aren't malignant, why are they letting their colleagues openly promote ideas that make the world a shittier place?
 
I don't give a lot of credit to the "majority are benign, it's the minority causing problems!" theory.

In black communities, why don't the name and shame the troublemakers, even when they burn down the place?
In governmental entities, why doesn't the "good" side of the FBI or CIA do anything about their evil, corrupt co-workers?
And in the WEF, if most billionaires aren't malignant, why are they letting their colleagues openly promote ideas that make the world a shittier place?
Are there any "large" organisations that meet your standard?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: i440BX
Back