why analytic philosophy stay dominant while continental philosophy don't? - a discussion about contemporary philosophy

the grey cat

between black and white
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 5, 2024
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Breadbassket
Can we really even call modern philosophy by that name? Is it really about the love of wisdom, or is it about grifting universities by publishing papers so obscurantist and devoid of meaning or value that no one can even follow it long enough to realize it's bullshit?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: The Last Stand
All I know if there are two schools of philosophy. The people who just tell us what we already knew, and the people hell bent on pushing the dumbest shit possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lowlife Adventures
to be serious here (i know it's a shitpost, shut up), kant is the guy who, i think, successfully synthesized empiricism with rationalism. while marx thought his ideas were good at his time because of the worker exploitation, shitty treatments, and all of that stuff.

pretty hilarious video though.
 
Last edited:
Neither are fundamentally dominant. They're germanic deviations from right proper thought. Brains without a systems of tenses fundamentally cannot think, though, so to this ends, neither are relevant systems of thought. Hoo hoo -- do you think like englishmen or germans? I'd prefer not to think like retards who don't understand what "perfect" means, and so I don't know any of them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Skitarii
But continental philosophy is still dominant? Frankfurt School and her offshoots ain't going anywhere anytime soon...
 
Bc logic is kind of important. Continental philosophy is still actually really dominant because of one word; Phenomenology
 
how? you damn dirty analytic.
Continental philosophy abandons clarity, reality, and logic in favor of vague word games, mystical abstractions, and linguistic self-indulgence
Continental thinkers deny that reality is knowable or even exists independently of language or interpretation, that by itself makes knowledge impossible (i.e. on such metaphysics, there is no epistemology)
And much of continental philosophy lays the groundwork for collectivism, historicism, and social engineering. Think Marxism, critical theory, and the postmodern attack on reason
So, by being intellectually hostile to reality, logic, and clarity, I can say with absolute certainty that "continental philosophy" is fucking retarded and should be renamed to "sophistry" or "shitposting"
 
If you ask people "what is philosophy?" they're going to reference some form of continental thought.
Analytical philosophy can barely detach itself from higher mathematics. That's why the anglo invented "Analytical philosophy" - they knew they couldn't compete with the French or the Germans in either maths or philosophy and thus they invented this half and half in which they are the world champion. With no competition, this makes winning all the easier - although far less meaningful.

So much for "dominance".

In other words: kys
 
If you ask people "what is philosophy?" they're going to reference some form of continental thought.
Analytical philosophy can barely detach itself from higher mathematics. That's why the anglo invented "Analytical philosophy" - they knew they couldn't compete with the French or the Germans in either maths or philosophy and thus they invented this half and half in which they are the world champion. With no competition, this makes winning all the easier - although far less meaningful.

So much for "dominance".

In other words: kys
1747997418792.webp

lol.
 
Back