Why do commies hate the homosexual?

Because children are seen as a tool for consumption by the state, those who do not produce the desired amount of children are on an equivalent level to those who do not produce their quota of goods/resources.
Gulag material, which unsurprisingly is exactly where most of them ended up. Those who could not work in the gulag were executed by the state.
 
because commie state needs worker bees who wear the same uniform, grow up loving the party, when it's time they procreate and raise kids and consider the highest honor to die for the country party.

After the Soviet revolution in 1917, commies wanted to destroy family, indeed the institution of marriage as an old, bourgoise, regressive trait of humanity. There was free love as long as it was responsible toward society. That obviously did not work, so they turned to what did, a puritanical state where porn was outright outlawed.

Homosexuality and other forms of deviancy was not conducive to building strong families, the lowest building point of communism (Lenin). Communism is all about building communism, not self-indulgence.
 
I'm talking the commies and their policies like in the former USSR, Cuba, China etc. Not the trust fund pseudo-commies like you usually find in the Anglosphere.
The Communists of old were strong believers in strong masculine men. The old soviet/chinese/north korean art reflects on this on how they depicted idealized men, women, and children as strong masculine workers. Homosexuality was treated as something that was propagated by capitalists and was seen as a product of bourgeois decadence. Which the past 5 years has only vindicated this with wave after wave of corporate pandering
 
From the traditionalist Marxist prospective, i.e. Marx, Lenin, Stalin, so on and so on. Homosexuality in either form is bourgeoisie decadence.

The basic tenants of marxism is from each his ability, his need or something along those lines. I.e. if you don't work you don't eat. The commune above all. In this together. The worker who does not produce strangles the commune. He robes from his fellow man. So in essence he and she who does not reproduce also strangles the commune. As it needs goods to survive. It needs new members to continue.

To draw a comparison. Think of the commune as the tribe or nation and that should help explain the disdain for homosexuality.

At least they got something right. Of course even marx could clear this basic hurdle of what makes a healthy society.
 
Because pondering on sexuality at all is peak capitalism.

The worker bee does not need, nor should, look to something so selfish as personal happiness or individualism. They should confirm and produce.
 
It is the duty of all of us to reproduce, to ensure the eternal progress of our society and pave the way onward towards a brighter future, comrade! now back to work
 
Last edited:
I'm talking the commies and their policies like in the former USSR, Cuba, China etc. Not the trust fund pseudo-commies like you usually find in the Anglosphere.
Because the real meaning of communism is gigachad space marine workers and muscular tomboy kolkhoz women breeding strong proletarian babies which will build 1,000,000,000 tanks and destroy the degenerate western world in a sea of nuclear fire and a storm of iron. Real niggas like Stalin (pbuh) knew that, but it all went downhill when the jewish doctors assassinated him

monument-worker-kolkhoz-woman-rabochiy-i-kolkhoznitsa-moscow-russia-77758051.jpg
 
The homosexual is the living embodiment of late stage capitalism. They are the ultimate liberals, a lumpenbourgeois that thrives in decadence and selfishness.

The homosexual is selfish and individualistic. He does not sacrifice sexual autonomy for the good of the whole, having children and bolstering the working class; he cares only for his own pleasures and desires in the here and now (sex, drugs, retro gaming emulation, etc).

The homosexual is a distraction from the class struggle. The forces of global capitalism promote Pride Month for the very same reason they ignore May Day and would never promote Labour Month or Anarcho-Agrarian Week - to channel energy away from the one struggle which, according to Marx, actually means something, the global struggle between the wealthy and the workers.

The homosexual is a good ally. They are the lapdogs of capitalism; they rise to the "middle" class, get their "well-paid" jobs in Big Tech and academia, and lock themselves into a golden cage. Once there, they use this position of class privilege to turn the class struggle on its head, marching in the streets and decrying "populism" - i.e. the needs and interests of the working class. The worker becomes the "ignorant homophobe", the factory manager, the "poor victim of oppression".


napoleonantiworker.png

"Class reductionism!" barks the dog on the left. "Coom and consoom!" barks the dog on the right.

"All animals are equal, but the gay ones are more equal than you."
 
Back