Why do people get ass blasted by feminists not wanting to have children?

We're below replacement level on fertility in pretty much all the West and Japan etc. A lot of people aren't aware of it yet but we're not going to be able to continue society as it is unless people start having more kids. Maybe the govt can offer huge tax credits so it's a lot cheaper to raise kids? That would really fucking help. Only thing is how could this possibly be instilled where it really matters *Cough-educated and career oriented people-Cough* especially in current year?

Even if we have to replace part of the population with autists, it's still way better then letting the welfare leeches replace most all of it.
 
Why do people care if feminists don’t have children? Isn’t it a good thing they’re not passing on their genes to the next generation?
1624691642678.png

If 61% of people stop having kids, or more realistically don't have them in a healthy family unit, it will effect millions of children. Children who become the next generation so on and so on.
 
We're below replacement level on fertility in pretty much all the West and Japan etc. A lot of people aren't aware of it yet but we're not going to be able to continue society as it is unless people start having more kids. Maybe the govt can offer huge tax credits so it's a lot cheaper to raise kids? That would really fucking help.
That's what immigrants are for. You'd have to be on some crazy level of poor-people mentality to worry about declining population rates when so many hardworking and ablebodied immigrants are eager to move here.
 
That's what immigrants are for. You'd have to be on some crazy level of poor-people mentality to worry about declining population rates when so many hardworking and ablebodied immigrants are eager to move here.
Lol, I know. Just wishful thinking on my part. It's too bad we can't easily improve the population of the educated and intelligent natives here.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Troonologist PhD
Probably because they've bought into the neo-Malthusian idea that if Western countries don't have above-replacement fertility, then the rest of the world will continue to grow in population and "take over" the world. It's an idea which has long been discredited by the evidence provided to us by demographers, but when has evidence ever persuaded political ideologues?
 
Many of them end up wanting children in their 40s, but insist throughout their 20s/30s they don't want children. Most of them deny their own biology for money and / or a shitty office job. I hate feminists because they hate children a lot of the time, which is simply a weird, fucked up behavior.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
Because that kind of behavior.... it's like something is wrong with them. They may say it's about "their choice", but that just comes off as them being misantropic and spoiled, myopic, and jaded to the point they don't want to continue the human race.
I feel this way with all militant antinatalists, because most don't hold the same standard for people who ain't white, or similarly aren't willing to free up space on the planet sooner by making a suicidal gesture.
 
Because when they inevitably do want to have children they'll be in their 40s and all their babies will be aspies.
I think it's something in the anti-natal environment. Most real true and honest autistics where born to parents who lived very close to A-roads, in rural areas, or by train-tracks. Some of them weren't even in their 40s; they can be much younger.
 
I don't get it myself. I think that if you know you can't take care of kids or wouldn't be able to devote enough time to them then you shouldn't have them. Having kids to save a marriage or because it's a woman's purpose isn't a good idea.

Look at how many people just squeeze out baby after baby and couldn't even be trusted with a pet rock. There was an article on A&N a few days ago where single hoodrat mother of eight beat and berated her son for being gay. She shaved the word "gay" into his hair.

The people having large swaths of kids are either poor trash or crazy fundies. Very few of these kids are going to grow up to be normal and productive.

Educated, affluent types have less kids on average. Some have none at all because it interferes with careers and travel too much.

There are too many opportunities for women outside of the home that make staving off or eliminating motherhood too tempting. I honestly think that's fine. If we had less people we'd have more resources.

Unfortunately, then we bring in the third worlders who have football teams worth of children.

Women want to be more than baby factories. Kids take up your time and having babies is hard on the body. Most women can't stay at home with the kids anymore because a one income household is difficult unless your husband makes bank. Maybe they should make housewife a career with a salary. It's actually been proposed before.
 
Back