On a long enough timeline, these things are far more detrimental to the reprobate. "Orthodox" reactionaries are simply teaching things that everyone believed until World War 2.
Can you show us some examples of this? I have never seen the phenomenon you describe.
What happens when the "majority" becomes a minority itself?
This feels like a bad cope.
You think like a racist. I'm talking about ideology. The world is on a path to being stratefied by ideology, not genetic lineage. The orthodox reactionary position is that God is no respecter of persons.
How does the question ascertain anything like a "racist." If the minority pushing an ideology become the majority and
How does one know that these outcomes aren't one in the same. The minority replacing the majority and silencing the new minority who stand opposed to said ideology. It plays out the same either way and just as well sounds like a cope or a splitting of hairs, similar vibes to "denying the concepts to own the racists."
If anything, it's the opposite of what OP thinks. These censorship attempts often trigger the Streisand Effect.
As Tyrion Lannister put it: "If you cut out a man's tongue, you do not prove him a liar. You only show the world that you fear what he may say."
All I mean is the pattern matches the "white majority replacement" mentalism.
Sure, but ideology doesn't function like race. A lot of normies are starting to see nonsense like "woke evangelism killed Star Wars / Marvel". We're not dealing with something like race that doesn't change, but rather something that's fluid that will eventually end up being consistent with truth.
"splitting of hairs" is an accusation people make when someone is making a subtle argument that they don't grasp, and "cope" tracks likewise. Ultimately, history will adjudicate this. I'm just speculating on what future history will look like, given a reactionary analysis of world history. The patterns don't lie. We are witnessing empire collapse in America. Same happened to Rome. The number of sociological trends coupled to ascendance and collapse of empire that recur between the two examples is breathtaking. One such example, concretely, is societal acceptance of faggotry. At the time of collapse, faggots become pariahs again.
If it matches and the initial concept isn't wrong maybe the other "mentalism" isn't either. That's a debate for another thread though.
Normies are reacting with some confusion to the new manager's ideology, the problem is many will still gulp it down or take steps to insure it does replace the truth long term. Similar to modern "All digital future" nonsense. Sure, now that people are having their digital goodies taken away some people are starting to fight it, the problem comes down to did we take too many steps past the line in the sand to ever turn it around. Same with other ideological power struggles occurring in modern times.
I don't disagree with your notion outright, merely only the part of your argument I contested. The rest I agree so far with.
Here, we're not going to agree. Your outlook is pessimistic. History is optimistic. Many tyrants in the past have gone to war with truth. I'll mention the Bolsheviks again. But Rome did similar, and history is littered with other examples. In the long run, truth wins, and the censors collapse. Among reactionary influencers, these historical truths are taken all but axiomatically.
My apologies, I should have prefaced, just because I don't trust in normies doesn't mean I'm pessimistic that such an issue in society can/can't be solved. It's why I pose the question "Are we too far past the line in the sand?" My issue is less whether truth wins and whether we are returning to an era of the High priest class dictating truth until that era collapses as well and what may or may not be lost with it. *Generally I believe outliers solve these issues, I bring up normies to present people that follow status quo thus are not the solution to that change.
Exactly. There are "safe" conspiracy theories like Flat Earth, Chemtrails etc. which are freely allowed on most platforms, and there are "dangerous" ones like Pizzagate and the JQ which get you banned from platforms on sight
