- Joined
- May 14, 2019
Dear Kiwi Farms, I would like to share with you some thoughts on how we can end the rash of incel terrorism that has been plaguing the country ever since the movie Joker (2019) released, causing Aurora copycat shootings in theaters all over the country.
The idea is what I call Wife Husbandry. It is the divine synthesis of the ancient practices of arranged marriages and the modern concept of a love marriage. In particular, I will be explaining the concept through historical example, using the story of British abolitionist Thomas Day.
INTRODUCTION
As texts like Making the Most of Marriage explain, the Western social convention of people marrying for love is a fairly recent innovation. Traditionally, arranged marriages were used instead, where kin or professional matchmakers selected potential spouses and, whether or not compulsion is used (a forced marriage is not the same as an arranged marriage) it is expected that the couple will marry regardless of love. Generally, the hope is that the couple - selected for reasons of practicality - will grow to love each other through familiarity. Another major factor, which is the factor relevant to our concerns here, is that love marriage is (relevant to arranged marriage) a major disadvantage to the sexually undesirable, such as incels.
Both forms of marriage have their strengths and weaknesses. The modern Western view has tended to be that the arranged marriage is sad because it leads to loveless marriage, whereas arranged marriage advocates argue that love marriages tend to break down because the emphasis on fickle emotion lays a weaker foundation than practicality does. But, what if there was some way to combine the best qualities of both? What if you could implement a new system in which all socially-productive people are more or less guaranteed a reasonable match, but also a high likelihood of a love match?
The concept of wife husbandry is simple. Our tastes are largely driven by our upbringing, and we have a natural affinity, excepting cases of abuse or sociopathy, for our parents, be they physical or adopted. By exposing a child to a food, they are more likely to favor that food. By exposing them to a hobby, they are more likely to take that hobby up. By socializing them with certain people, you create relationships between them and those people.
It is reasonable to think that you could, by assigning guardianship of a girl to her adoptive father-husband, he could gently raise her to love him, transferring the natural daughter-father bond over to the matrimonial bond, and also conditioning the child for domestic servitude.
THOMAS DAY
en.wikipedia.org
Thomas Day (1748-1789) attempted such an experiment. I have heard many of you complain about the state of the Modern Woman on this forum, and Day had his own issues with the women of his time. As an educated gentleman of Enlightenment England, Day merely wanted a wife who was also an intellectual of his caliber with impeccable moral character and a commitment to an ascetic lifestyle, such as that of a . Such a woman seemed unobtainable in his society, though; any educated woman tended to lack the vigorous, pioneer-like spirit, while any simple "mountain girl" lacked the polish of the city. It also did not help that every woman he proposed to rejected him. Thus, Day resolved that if he could not find a wife like that, he would have to produce one himself.
His brilliant idea lead him to acquire two orphan girls, one age 11 and one age 12, which he promptly renamed to Sabrina and Lucretia, much as one might give a new name to a stray dog that one finds. His intention was to try to train both, and whichever one turned out worse he would marry off to someone else; as a true humanitarian, Day was always looking out for his fellow man.
Unfortunately, the attempt did not go well. The girls did not get along well, as they often fought with each other, and Lucretia turned out to be a dimwitted thot. In the end, Day had to give up when his attempts to train Sabrina in the womanly art of pain tolerance (by pouring hot wax on her arm) failed. I think it is fair to say that Day was more of a victim of his own ambition, as rather than scale back to more realistic goals, he gave up on the project.
Now, I must address one major objection I expect you readers will be making: isn't this a form of child grooming? Wikipedia seems to think so, given they link Day's article to it. However, it should be noted that there is no documentary evidence that Day fucked Sabrina or Lucretia. Day was a gentleman of the highest caliber, and we can assume that he would not have spilled his seed for an inferior woman, or despoiled a virgin. How can it be "child grooming" if you wait until they're an adult, and then lawfully marry them before consummating?
Another point one might make is whether or not wife husbandry counts as slavery, particularly since Day is primarily known for his abolitionist activities, and was also later known to have cut his wife (when he did finally get married, to an older heiress) cut off from her family. But that's a rather silly way of looking at it. Wife husbandry does not require the existence of forced marriage, especially when it is specifically designed to produce a voluntary match. Further, it is trivial that all children are basically slaves of their parents anyways until the age of majority. The right to transfer ownership of the child is implied in the right to kill the child, which was confirmed by Governor Northam of Virginia. If the child can be killed at will, that is, the property destroyed, then isn't it, from the perspective of the property-holder, equivalent to destroy property versus transferring it without compensation? Then, if one accepts the principle that the parental right to kill the child (via post-natal abortion) implies the right to give away the child, wouldn't it follow that a price may be put on the child, so that the patriarch of a family can sell his daughters? The important distinction is that slavery applies to adults who are acting in the role of master-slave, whereas guardianship applies to adult and child in the role of guardian-dependent.
Personal issues and objections aside, Day may still be regarded as a pioneer in the field of Wife Husbandry, as he was the first man I am aware of who attempted to apply the rationalism of the Enlightenment to create the Perfect Woman. This heroic figure's noble experiment may be the key to unlocking the great Third Mode of Marriage Formation, to replace Arranged Marriages and Love Marriages, thus unlocking a Golden Age for Mankind.
CONCLUSION
The story of human civilization has been one of continuous domestication. Mankind's first great leap forward came when he learned to domesticate fire (as they like to say now, instead of "inventing" it). He then domesticated the wolf, creating the dog, and then the grass seed, creating wheat. Our history has been one of taking the crude and undesirable in nature and fashioning it into the beautiful and functional.
The next step forward for humanity may be to apply the principles of domestication to the domestic sphere, by extending the concept of animal husbandry to the fairer sex, creating a new system of wife husbandry which will ensure an equitable distribution of high-quality marriages to all men and women.
The idea is what I call Wife Husbandry. It is the divine synthesis of the ancient practices of arranged marriages and the modern concept of a love marriage. In particular, I will be explaining the concept through historical example, using the story of British abolitionist Thomas Day.
INTRODUCTION
As texts like Making the Most of Marriage explain, the Western social convention of people marrying for love is a fairly recent innovation. Traditionally, arranged marriages were used instead, where kin or professional matchmakers selected potential spouses and, whether or not compulsion is used (a forced marriage is not the same as an arranged marriage) it is expected that the couple will marry regardless of love. Generally, the hope is that the couple - selected for reasons of practicality - will grow to love each other through familiarity. Another major factor, which is the factor relevant to our concerns here, is that love marriage is (relevant to arranged marriage) a major disadvantage to the sexually undesirable, such as incels.
Both forms of marriage have their strengths and weaknesses. The modern Western view has tended to be that the arranged marriage is sad because it leads to loveless marriage, whereas arranged marriage advocates argue that love marriages tend to break down because the emphasis on fickle emotion lays a weaker foundation than practicality does. But, what if there was some way to combine the best qualities of both? What if you could implement a new system in which all socially-productive people are more or less guaranteed a reasonable match, but also a high likelihood of a love match?
The concept of wife husbandry is simple. Our tastes are largely driven by our upbringing, and we have a natural affinity, excepting cases of abuse or sociopathy, for our parents, be they physical or adopted. By exposing a child to a food, they are more likely to favor that food. By exposing them to a hobby, they are more likely to take that hobby up. By socializing them with certain people, you create relationships between them and those people.
It is reasonable to think that you could, by assigning guardianship of a girl to her adoptive father-husband, he could gently raise her to love him, transferring the natural daughter-father bond over to the matrimonial bond, and also conditioning the child for domestic servitude.
THOMAS DAY
Thomas Day - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Thomas Day (1748-1789) attempted such an experiment. I have heard many of you complain about the state of the Modern Woman on this forum, and Day had his own issues with the women of his time. As an educated gentleman of Enlightenment England, Day merely wanted a wife who was also an intellectual of his caliber with impeccable moral character and a commitment to an ascetic lifestyle, such as that of a . Such a woman seemed unobtainable in his society, though; any educated woman tended to lack the vigorous, pioneer-like spirit, while any simple "mountain girl" lacked the polish of the city. It also did not help that every woman he proposed to rejected him. Thus, Day resolved that if he could not find a wife like that, he would have to produce one himself.
His brilliant idea lead him to acquire two orphan girls, one age 11 and one age 12, which he promptly renamed to Sabrina and Lucretia, much as one might give a new name to a stray dog that one finds. His intention was to try to train both, and whichever one turned out worse he would marry off to someone else; as a true humanitarian, Day was always looking out for his fellow man.
Unfortunately, the attempt did not go well. The girls did not get along well, as they often fought with each other, and Lucretia turned out to be a dimwitted thot. In the end, Day had to give up when his attempts to train Sabrina in the womanly art of pain tolerance (by pouring hot wax on her arm) failed. I think it is fair to say that Day was more of a victim of his own ambition, as rather than scale back to more realistic goals, he gave up on the project.
Now, I must address one major objection I expect you readers will be making: isn't this a form of child grooming? Wikipedia seems to think so, given they link Day's article to it. However, it should be noted that there is no documentary evidence that Day fucked Sabrina or Lucretia. Day was a gentleman of the highest caliber, and we can assume that he would not have spilled his seed for an inferior woman, or despoiled a virgin. How can it be "child grooming" if you wait until they're an adult, and then lawfully marry them before consummating?
Another point one might make is whether or not wife husbandry counts as slavery, particularly since Day is primarily known for his abolitionist activities, and was also later known to have cut his wife (when he did finally get married, to an older heiress) cut off from her family. But that's a rather silly way of looking at it. Wife husbandry does not require the existence of forced marriage, especially when it is specifically designed to produce a voluntary match. Further, it is trivial that all children are basically slaves of their parents anyways until the age of majority. The right to transfer ownership of the child is implied in the right to kill the child, which was confirmed by Governor Northam of Virginia. If the child can be killed at will, that is, the property destroyed, then isn't it, from the perspective of the property-holder, equivalent to destroy property versus transferring it without compensation? Then, if one accepts the principle that the parental right to kill the child (via post-natal abortion) implies the right to give away the child, wouldn't it follow that a price may be put on the child, so that the patriarch of a family can sell his daughters? The important distinction is that slavery applies to adults who are acting in the role of master-slave, whereas guardianship applies to adult and child in the role of guardian-dependent.
Personal issues and objections aside, Day may still be regarded as a pioneer in the field of Wife Husbandry, as he was the first man I am aware of who attempted to apply the rationalism of the Enlightenment to create the Perfect Woman. This heroic figure's noble experiment may be the key to unlocking the great Third Mode of Marriage Formation, to replace Arranged Marriages and Love Marriages, thus unlocking a Golden Age for Mankind.
CONCLUSION
The story of human civilization has been one of continuous domestication. Mankind's first great leap forward came when he learned to domesticate fire (as they like to say now, instead of "inventing" it). He then domesticated the wolf, creating the dog, and then the grass seed, creating wheat. Our history has been one of taking the crude and undesirable in nature and fashioning it into the beautiful and functional.
The next step forward for humanity may be to apply the principles of domestication to the domestic sphere, by extending the concept of animal husbandry to the fairer sex, creating a new system of wife husbandry which will ensure an equitable distribution of high-quality marriages to all men and women.
