Will the traditional family structure eventually disappear?

Thiletonomics

Hey, I'm ready if you are.
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 1, 2015
With things such as LGBT movement being put into full motion to the point that it feels like it get's forced down peoples' throats, i.e. in the media, and people abandoning their families to troon out, i.e. Greta and Stefonkee, and reports of lower birth rates in countries, do you think that the traditional family structure will go extinct?

What I find is the misandry movement, aiming to make men feel bad about themselves for being men, is adding to that. You have The Last of Us 2, where pretty much almost every man, and father/husband figure, gets either maimed or killed off. It comes off to the point that it gives the impression that Neil Druckmann himself has/had daddy issues, even though he is married and has at least one daughter. Granted, I don't think media alone can do that, but with how the LGBT movement is getting more and more noticeable, it would probably wear out on some people eventually. And speaking of, has the LGBT community changed their mindset in regards to people who troon out and abandon their families, going to the point of accepting them for doing so, and berating the other family members that get left behind.
 
It only seems like it's disappearing because the covering niche things generates a lot of viewers/readers for the media, and because most people on KF tend to "doomscroll" media articles that make them angry/upset.

Even if some alternative becomes more vogue amongst hipsters, immigration course-corrects that with immigrants who only know of the nuclear family and nothing else.
 
No, the LGBT movement is not going to render tradition families extinct, and for that matter, neither will women being able to get jobs, and bullshit like that.

Heterosexual people will still form families no matter what twitter, troons, or a fucking video game says. If they go extinct just because of fags and troons then they deserve to.
 
No. News coverage makes a niche seem like the majority. Fortunately, society has kept a lot of degenerate shit at bay. The nuclear family is still in tact and will be for as long as it is the most resilient family structure.

My answer to this question will be the complete opposite when humanity finally gets its shit together and makes anime girls real. At that point, civilization will fall.
 
You can't reproduce without a hetero couple. The biological realities of that fact aren't changing anytime soon. 10,000+ years of human history has been built on different variants of the "mother, father, kids" theme- A few decades of propaganda won't stop that- not even a particularly upsetting video game.
 
The Western nuclear family already is endangered. Record numbers of 18-30 adults live with their non-elderly parents. Age of marriage is greatly delayed. I wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing more and more elderly people move in with their kids given what's happened with nursing homes in 2020. This has created a family structure more akin to what we see in Africa where several generations of one family live under the same roof. Wouldn't be surprised if more and more extended family like cousins, etc. are also living together.

Blame the idea that everything needs constant growth for this, in particular the idea that women must be in the workforce since raising a family on one income is impossible for anyone but the rich, the idea that many poorer elderly people never being able to truly retire should they choose to, and home ownership being out of range for the young to start a family. Countries like Japan have truly extreme versions of this but this is true in most of the Western world. Because our elites decreed their businesses must increase profits year after year, they have sometimes inadvertently and sometimes deliberately destroyed the family structure. This "must have constant growth" also applies to why feminism is so successfull--if women are taught to consoom product for themselves since family isn't important, then of course there will be tons of difficulty in relationships.

If you want to look at the endgame, look at the black community. They suffer huge wealth disparity and the culture has been systematically destroyed through misguided initiatives and propaganda since the 60s to form a bloc of extremely materialistic people who are easy to lead by the nose to do whatever you want (like, say, consoom product or vote correctly). Even if it isn't in their community's best interest they've still persuaded blacks to do their bidding like keep buying shitty weave, and malt liquor or voting corrupt politicians who do nothing while their neighborhoods are full of gangs and crime. This is helped and enabled in large part by the huge illegitimacy rate, lack of stable marriages, and minimal influence of the nuclear family. Broken households and poverty combine to make a vicious generational cycle that keeps blacks on the plantation.

And the elites want this for everyone but them--massive wealth disparities and broken households combining to make materialistic people easy to control. This is why you must do nothing but consoom and have a little sex on the side. Your children will be raised by their mother and whatever other men and women are in her life since the idea of monogamy is oppressive and outdated. Your mother considers her children a fashion accessory just like the many others she owns. Traditional families will be villified and these alternative families considered just as good. If you do not submit to this, then you will almost certainly never marry (because both men and women will be corrupted) and it will be easy for the courts to strip you of your children because you're raising them in an oppressive environment. You likely will be poor and destitute since your social credit score will be in the toilet for this.

I don't consider the LGBs to be a major threat to families. It's possible to promote an LGB culture that demands monogamy instead of endless trips to the gay bathhouse and bugchasing. Relationships could be encouraged that have a more masculine partner (like a bear or diesel dyke) and a more feminine partner (like a twink or lipstick lesbian). I still don't think it's a good idea to raise boys in a lesbian household or girls in a gay household though. Advances in artificial wombs and stem cells could probably permit LGBs to breed. Even the troons aren't much of a threat since troons are almost always rather masculine (MTFs) or feminine (FTMs) in personality no matter how "trans-lesbian" or whatever they claim to be plus troons sterilize themselves with drugs and self-mutilation.

The real threat is the assault on monogamy and marriage and promotion of polygamous relationships.
 
Back