Plagued William "Billy D" Usher / cyguration & OneAngryGamer (oneangrygamer.net) - Joe McCarthy if McCarthy were a self-hating Black Pedophile alongside his Base of Authoritarian Wingnuts who hate The Gays™ & Overwatch; Definitely Not (((Nazis))); From Sperging about Anything in Multimedia to Splurging out Garbage Articles

Honestly, at this point, is Billy actually legit or he's just a gay op meant to make certain types of people look bad? It's like he's a living SJW Boogeyman stereotype, where he exists so SJWs have someone they can point at as 'proof' to justify their claims.
Does he even know what are optics?
He's retarded dude tf you expect? If he is a troll he's the best one in the world to have a business off it
 
Honestly, at this point, is Billy actually legit or he's just a gay op meant to make certain types of people look bad? It's like he's a living SJW Boogeyman stereotype, where he exists so SJWs have someone they can point at as 'proof' to justify their claims.
Does he even know what are optics?

You sound like one of those optics cucks. The way you win is yelling nigger a lot.
 
Untitled1.png
The full context made it even more stupid if you look at the tweet:


1581148433633.png


A pro-GG Twitter user, saw Billaaaaaay and Dr Cool sperging out about Kiwi Farms, involving Dr Cool sper-- oops I mean, "roasting" us on the site with Billaaaay praising him, and criticising them for doing so. And OAG's response?

1581148468127.png


Ah yes, so OAG and Dr Cool sperging out on KF is "fake news". If you wonder what is even in that link, (which of course, none of the replies even bother to amuse him about that), here it is: The subject in the link is not the article but rather... a post in the comments section of an article:


1581148170763.png


And how is this making it any better? Oh well, at least there's some replies praising Billaay and his brave antics in demolishing "fake news"!

.... oh.

1581148508272.png1581148524509.png1581148542287.png


1581148774735.png1581148786673.png1581148867410.png

1581148951301.png


1581149046044.png1581149092435.png
1581149124852.png
1581149132627.png


We totally didn't celebrate the Arthur cartoon being censored, stop spreading fake news!

1581149343485.png1581149362929.png1581149399674.png1581149508780.png1581149561973.png1581149610903.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Immortal Technique
The full context made it even more stupid if you look at the tweet:


View attachment 1135555

A pro-GG Twitter user, saw Billaaaaaay and Dr Cool sperging out about Kiwi Farms, involving Dr Cool sper-- oops I mean, "roasting" us on the site with Billaaaay praising him, and criticising them for doing so. And OAG's response?

View attachment 1135556

Ah yes, so OAG and Dr Cool sperging out on KF is "fake news". If you wonder what is even in that link, (which of course, none of the replies even bother to amuse him about that), here it is: The subject in the link is not the article but rather... a post in the comments section of an article:


View attachment 1135552

And how is this making it any better? Oh well, at least there's some replies praising Billaay and his brave antics in demolishing "fake news"!

.... oh.

View attachment 1135558View attachment 1135559View attachment 1135561


View attachment 1135569View attachment 1135570View attachment 1135571

View attachment 1135573


View attachment 1135575View attachment 1135576


We totally didn't celebrate the Arthur cartoon being censored, stop spreading fake news!

View attachment 1135586View attachment 1135588View attachment 1135591View attachment 1135593View attachment 1135595View attachment 1135600
Getting canceled for his own community for embarrassing them via wrongthink then claiming to be the victim all along. The parallels to the trans/social justice Twitter crowds are almost palpable, just replace the desire to discriminate against Caucasians with the desire to throw out racial slurs about non-Caucasians casually.
 
He is absolutely OBSESSED with the fact that one or two people on here accused his pet sperg of being his sockpuppet. He can't refute any of the 8 billion other accusations made against him of being a homophobic racist or planning gayops that more than warrant the mockery he gets so he keeps desperately circling back to the "IT WASN'T MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE" because it's the only thing he has.

At this point even if it's not true I think people should keep accusing him of being Dr Cool just to watch him continue reeing about it.

PS. Pro-Tip Billy, maybe people wouldn't mistake you for your 13 year old fans if you didn't behave exactly like them.
 
oneangrygamer4.png


the traitor according to ThyBonesConsumd.png


From the blasphemy of the fallen brothers, our God-Emperor Billy, deliver us

From the depths of my soul, your Holy Words shall not be extinguished

https://twitter.com/ThyBonesConsumd/status/1225984637836464130 ( http://archive.ph/bt2D8 )
https://twitter.com/ThyBonesConsumd/status/1226042279812427776 ( http://archive.ph/One79 )
https://twitter.com/ThyBonesConsumd/status/1225958235103825921 ( http://archive.ph/tEuHU )
https://twitter.com/ThyBonesConsumd/status/1225957956505616384 ( http://archive.ph/NUgM4 )
https://twitter.com/ThyBonesConsumd/status/1225988222917832708 ( http://archive.ph/tlLDy )
 
Last edited:
View attachment 1135677

View attachment 1135678

From the blasphemy of the fallen brothers, our God-Emperor Billy, deliver us

From the depths of my soul, your Holy Words shall not be extinguished

https://twitter.com/ThyBonesConsumd/status/1225984637836464130 ( http://archive.ph/bt2D8 )
https://twitter.com/ThyBonesConsumd/status/1226042279812427776 ( http://archive.ph/One79 )
https://twitter.com/ThyBonesConsumd/status/1225958235103825921 ( http://archive.ph/tEuHU )
https://twitter.com/ThyBonesConsumd/status/1225957956505616384 ( http://archive.ph/NUgM4 )
https://twitter.com/ThyBonesConsumd/status/1225988222917832708 ( http://archive.ph/tlLDy )

Alright, since OAG and ThyBonesConsumed kept on saying it's fake news, here's from what I gather from their own perspective:

1. Here's Doctor Cool/Jordan/Bobby Joe, a common troll in OAG, and we'll have our very own OAG users explained about him based on the links provided:

1581158922860.png1581159057650.png1581159074090.png

2. Jordan decided to sperg out on-- oops, I forgot, roasting us because both him and Billaaaaay hate us:

1581148170763-png.1135552

oneangrygamer2-png.1134259


3. Naturally, very few people on Twitter thought that Billaaaay was the one who sperged out on our forum, so OAG quickly jumped onto it and saying it was fake news, and it was some troll who did it, but they forgot these factors:

a. Billaaaay actually praised the action, rather than calling him out (If he actually did, we wouldn't give a shit and actually praise him);
b. Others on Twitter are criticising OAG as a whole for trying to pick a fight with us, as shown in the comments section of OAG;
c. Billaaaaay thinks we're trying to deplatform/harm etc. the site but in reality we're just laughing at their paranoia and even Sophia is laughing;


How is this making any better?
"Stop making fake news about how we sperged out on Kiwi Farms, it's just an OAG troll that we didn't even bash him about it but we actually praise him, and we actually sperged about KF on our site, stop it!"

Summary:
1581149343485-png.1135586
 
Welp, Billy has declared war on the Farms because of me. Lulz.
And now that even Null is acknowledging it, I guess we are past the point of no return boys.

See you on Mad at the Internet Billy boy. 🤣
View attachment 1136000

P.S - I'm not a Furry you moron.

I remain amused by how consistently angry he gets over being publicly criticized, especially since he's in the same business I am of giving opinions on games.

He is not going to be universally beloved, either personally or professionally. I know for sure I'm not, and I've had my work and my person given everything from legitimate critique to outright insults.

And from what I've seen, those screenshots remain consistent with the criticism he's got a hair trigger temper over any dissent with his views and that he loses his mind over things that are blown way out of proportion. He's also been the target of some insults too of course, but the critique is pretty on point.

He's also committing a really terrible fallacy here. Even the person who made the thread was actually a furry, if they make an argument based on evidence, it would not diminish the credibility of their arguments. Attacking the person instead of their arguments (and he does that very poorly as well) is the mark of someone who can't criticize someone without being vicious and petty about it.
 
Welp, Billy has declared war on the Farms because of me. Lulz.
And now that even Null is acknowledging it, I guess we are past the point of no return boys.

See you on Mad at the Internet Billy boy. 🤣
View attachment 1136000

P.S - I'm not a Furry you moron.


Billaaaaaaay just pretty much reaped what he sowed for trying to sperg out at us on his site. He tried to link us to ahegao clothings being banned in anime conventions (for some dumb reason?), tried to link us trying to deplatform his site (even though it's the exact opposite, he even tried to go on and say laughing at a site will lead to deplatforming?), and as well trying to throw dumb insults-- oh I'm sorry, roasting us, and that's more than enough to consider him throwing crap to us even if he didn't have an account here (yet).

Also what exactly did the OP of the thread spread falsehoods about you, Billaaaaaaaay?
 
Once again I am baffled by people like Billy. I know he wants to think everyone who talks shit about him is conspiring in a gay op or something, but I would've figured he had at least enough sense left in him to realize Kiwifarms isn't going after him. Threads on this site are literally just repositories of the shit people say and do, and people talking to each other about it. As far as I know, everything he thinks is a "gay op" would've happened whether or not people here were looking.

Funny how he prides himself on being a reporter and looking for the truth, when all it would take for him to figure things out is to look at his own thread and see the third damn rule on the guidelines.
 
I remain amused by how consistently angry he gets over being publicly criticized, especially since he's in the same business I am of giving opinions on games.

He is not going to be universally beloved, either personally or professionally. I know for sure I'm not, and I've had my work and my person given everything from legitimate critique to outright insults.

And from what I've seen, those screenshots remain consistent with the criticism he's got a hair trigger temper over any dissent with his views and that he loses his mind over things that are blown way out of proportion. He's also been the target of some insults too of course, but the critique is pretty on point.

He's also committing a really terrible fallacy here. Even the person who made the thread was actually a furry, if they make an argument based on evidence, it would not diminish the credibility of their arguments. Attacking the person instead of their arguments (and he does that very poorly as well) is the mark of someone who can't criticize someone without being vicious and petty about it.
Where do you write about games?
 
I wonder how does Billy take in the latest Coomer/Cumbrain meme. It seems to be a trending thing in right-winged circles about discouraging masturbation, porn, etc. if outright shaming said things and those who like it because of Christian values, saving your cum to populate the white race or something.
Surely there's fellow right-wingers who read Billy's stuff and would point out his coomer antics right?
Obviously the "right-wingers" spreading that meme are actually leftist deep cover agents seeking to corrupt the right with their hatred of sexuality.;)
 
  • Informative
Reactions: UnclePhil
Where do you write about games?

ChristCenteredGamer, check for anything written by "Daniel Cullen".

And I find it ironic because my rag is basically One Angry Gamer's mirror image in a way. Where he celebrates sex and violence and praises explicit content, our site has a moral review tacked onto our regular game reviews (though we keep the scores separate), so we more often than not wind up giving games with that sort of content a bad moral score even if they are good games on a technical level.

Essentially, he and I are alike in writing from an ideological POV.

However, there are differences. Where he sees a game that removes or censors such content as bad as a game as well as in opposition to his morals, we at CCG would likely praise the removal of such content on moral grounds while still rating the game on its technical merits based purely on those grounds alone seperately.

Now, I'm not going to criticize his point of view that he writes from. I'm obligated by contract to include a moral review along with a regular gameplay review on what I write, and sometimes I really wish I could skip that because it's kinda tedious to do at times, but I do it anyway because it's our policy to include it. He has the choice to go on a tear about how good or bad a game is because of it's explicit sex or violence or not, he has the choice I don't to simply state facts or spray his POV all over what he writes as well.

What I am going to criticize is how he takes criticism. We both write for games review blogs with a strong ideological point of view, but getting crapped on for our reviews is something CCG takes on the chin. Christian morality in general has that whole "you will suffer as Christ did and doing things in his name will not make everyone love you" bit written into it, and it's our policy as writers to remember not everyone will love us and we respect dissent because it's going to happen, we can be adults and accept we will not be loved by everyone.

Billy, on the other hand, sees all criticism, regardless of being valid or whether it's in good or bad faith, as an attack. If you disagree with him, you will be the target of a torrent of abuse for daring to say he has a viewpoint you don't like and you're whatever evil buzzwords he wants to assign you rather than someone who disagrees with him.
 
ChristCenteredGamer, check for anything written by "Daniel Cullen".

And I find it ironic because my rag is basically One Angry Gamer's mirror image in a way. Where he celebrates sex and violence and praises explicit content, our site has a moral review tacked onto our regular game reviews (though we keep the scores separate), so we more often than not wind up giving games with that sort of content a bad moral score even if they are good games on a technical level.

Essentially, he and I are alike in writing from an ideological POV.

However, there are differences. Where he sees a game that removes or censors such content as bad as a game as well as in opposition to his morals, we at CCG would likely praise the removal of such content on moral grounds while still rating the game on its technical merits based purely on those grounds alone seperately.

Now, I'm not going to criticize his point of view that he writes from. I'm obligated by contract to include a moral review along with a regular gameplay review on what I write, and sometimes I really wish I could skip that because it's kinda tedious to do at times, but I do it anyway because it's our policy to include it. He has the choice to go on a tear about how good or bad a game is because of it's explicit sex or violence or not, he has the choice I don't to simply state facts or spray his POV all over what he writes as well.

What I am going to criticize is how he takes criticism. We both write for games review blogs with a strong ideological point of view, but getting crapped on for our reviews is something CCG takes on the chin. Christian morality in general has that whole "you will suffer as Christ did and doing things in his name will not make everyone love you" bit written into it, and it's our policy as writers to remember not everyone will love us and we respect dissent because it's going to happen, we can be adults and accept we will not be loved by everyone.

Billy, on the other hand, sees all criticism, regardless of being valid or whether it's in good or bad faith, as an attack. If you disagree with him, you will be the target of a torrent of abuse for daring to say he has a viewpoint you don't like and you're whatever evil buzzwords he wants to assign you rather than someone who disagrees with him.
I see...Unlike you I won't reveal my power level but I will say we are in the same field. Billy isn't writing from an ideological point of view like you are obligated to, he is pandering to the only people who will give him a look. He is a SJW who was "wronged" by his peers and so he acts out what he thinks an anti is.
 
Last edited:
Back