ChristCenteredGamer, check for anything written by "Daniel Cullen".
And I find it ironic because my rag is basically One Angry Gamer's mirror image in a way. Where he celebrates sex and violence and praises explicit content, our site has a moral review tacked onto our regular game reviews (though we keep the scores separate), so we more often than not wind up giving games with that sort of content a bad moral score even if they are good games on a technical level.
Essentially, he and I are alike in writing from an ideological POV.
However, there are differences. Where he sees a game that removes or censors such content as bad as a game as well as in opposition to his morals, we at CCG would likely praise the removal of such content on moral grounds while still rating the game on its technical merits based purely on those grounds alone seperately.
Now, I'm not going to criticize his point of view that he writes from. I'm obligated by contract to include a moral review along with a regular gameplay review on what I write, and sometimes I really wish I could skip that because it's kinda tedious to do at times, but I do it anyway because it's our policy to include it. He has the choice to go on a tear about how good or bad a game is because of it's explicit sex or violence or not, he has the choice I don't to simply state facts or spray his POV all over what he writes as well.
What I am going to criticize is how he takes criticism. We both write for games review blogs with a strong ideological point of view, but getting crapped on for our reviews is something CCG takes on the chin. Christian morality in general has that whole "you will suffer as Christ did and doing things in his name will not make everyone love you" bit written into it, and it's our policy as writers to remember not everyone will love us and we respect dissent because it's going to happen, we can be adults and accept we will not be loved by everyone.
Billy, on the other hand, sees all criticism, regardless of being valid or whether it's in good or bad faith, as an attack. If you disagree with him, you will be the target of a torrent of abuse for daring to say he has a viewpoint you don't like and you're whatever evil buzzwords he wants to assign you rather than someone who disagrees with him.