Would you rather be rich in a first world country or rich in a third world shithole?

[DerKryptid]

Jew or dictator, pick your poison

 

[Truman the Jewman]

Dictator 100%. If money is no object I would live in a complete hellhole where I could essentially have whatever I want at all times by paying the right people. I'd be like the villains in those fucking Raid movies from Indonesia.

 

[Just Another Apocalypse]

First world. I'm too much of an uppity field nigger to last long in a dictatorship.

One verse of Danny Kayes The Kings New Clothes and I'd be done for.

 

[mr.moon1488]

What's the difference these days?

 

[Billy Beer]

What kind of third world shit hole? I wouldn't mind owning a few tropical islands that are located in third world shit holes.

 

[The Wicked Mitch]

I'd rather be a subsistence farmer provided I was free from the globohomo.

 

[Tookie]

Third world. Nicer weather and no trannies getting shoved in your face constantly.

Food is usually spicy and devoid of soyifying substances too.

 

[Megaroad 2012]

Rather be poor but free than rich to a slave system.

 

[WULULULULU]

First World. I can finally fulfill my wish to gas Palestinians, Vietnamese and Philippine shitters to my hearts content.

 

[Niggernerd]

Third world because I'd not be rich..I'd be alpha omega rich thus can own the country and turn it into a safe haven for racism...THAT IS THE PLAN OF THE CEO OF RACISM MUHAHAHAHAHA

 

[Toolbox]

At this point inflation is reaching such ridiculous levels in the first world that at some point being 'rich' in a relatively disconnected third world country would probably leave you richer than if you were what is considered rich in a random "first world" country. Especially seeing the way the US is going.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Rich in a shithole, obviously. Even shitholes are tolerable rich, and you don't need to stay.