Culture WSJ: America’s 60-Year-Olds Are Staring at Financial Peril - Younger boomers face cash crunch

Source: https://www.wsj.com/personal-finance/americas-60-year-olds-are-staring-at-financial-peril-62599a76
Archive: https://archive.is/T1Tk5

America’s 60-Year-Olds Are Staring at Financial Peril​

A bruising recession and the disappearance of pensions have left many young boomers financially exposed​

By Jon Kamp, Scott Calvert and Paul Overberg
July 22, 2024 9:00 pm ET

1721756727026.png
Shauna Sharpes doesn’t travel and grows much of her own food at her home in western Washington state. The payroll manager for a local Native American tribal authority has meager savings and expects she will have to keep working for at least the next decade.

Part of her challenge: She turned 60 in January, putting her at the tail end of a baby boom generation that is hurtling toward retirement age in uncertainty. Born in a midcentury, postwar America brimming with promise, many of the youngest boomers are still sporting financial bruises from the 2007-09 recession and the nation’s steady shift away from guaranteed pensions.

“The most important things for me right now are a place to live indoors, water and food,” said Sharpes, who has about $3,000 in her retirement accounts. “And thinking about how I’m going to provide that for myself from now until I drop dead.”

By the end of this year, the youngest baby boomers will all turn 60. The birth dates of those in this generation—around 70 million strong, or one in five Americans—cover a 19-year span stretching from the aftermath of World War II to 1964, the year the Beatles made their debut on the Ed Sullivan Show.

Older Americans—including young boomers with retirement accounts powered by a booming stock market—remain a major force in the economy. Those 55 and up control nearly 70% of U.S. household wealth, Federal Reserve data show.

But that age group also includes older adults with little if any retirement funds socked away, or only Social Security to lean on, who are facing golden years laden with risk. For millions of younger boomers, who could live at least two more decades, a lost job or expensive medical problem could upend their stability while ramping up pressure on younger generations.

1721756738102.png

The baby-boom generation’s long span means the youngest boomers hit major life events at different times than their elders. Their midcareer years, when earnings typically start to peak, got upended by the 2007-09 financial shock, according to retirement experts. Younger boomers without traditional pensions had to shoulder more investment risk while saving for retirement. There is also a greater share of nonwhite young boomers who are more likely to lack retirement accounts.

About a third of younger boomer households lacked retirement benefits beyond Social Security in 2022, the most recent year available, according to a closely watched Federal Reserve tool called the Survey of Consumer Finances. When the older boomers were roughly the same age, a smaller amount—one quarter—were missing these retirement benefits.

Many others have only meager savings or are worried that soaring health costs will quickly drain their reserves.
More of these young boomers “are going to enter into retirement without the resources they need,” said David John, who studies retirement savings issues at the AARP Public Policy Institute.

For many, making ends meet will likely mean having to work well into old age, if they are able. But they may also have to rely on younger family members as caregivers and for financial support. A large number of seniors in poverty could also increase reliance on Medicaid, the health program for the poor, which foots bills for long-term care including nursing homes.

Sharpes, who has four adult daughters and lives in Oakville, Wash., lost roughly half the $20,000 in her 401(k) during the financial shock of 2007-09, she said. She applied the remainder to a home mortgage despite the steep penalty for early withdrawal.

Several years after the financial crisis, she said, she lost her job as controller of a small lumber yard when the company closed. Her marriage also ended.

Last year, she bought a rundown two-bedroom home on nearly 2 acres that she is rehabbing with her fiancé. She hopes to at least cut back on work by age 70. To do that, she said, she will need to pay down $260,000 in home-related debt while belatedly building a retirement nest egg. Her target: $100,000.

“It’s not going to be a lot, I already know this,” she said.

A recent study looking at the roughly 30 million young boomers who will turn 65 between this year and 2030 determined that just over half have no more than $250,000 in financial assets. This makes it likely these people will have to rely on Social Security after burning through savings as a primary source of income in retirement, according to the study, commissioned by the Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit Alliance for Lifetime Income, which advocates for retirement annuities and includes insurers and financial-services companies.

“Social Security was never intended to be the sole source of income later in life,” said Ramsey Alwin, chief executive at the National Council on Aging, which advocates for older peoples’ financial security.

Researchers at Boston College’s Center for Retirement Research, who have studied financial weaknesses among young boomers, said that there are several contributing factors.

One is that younger boomers are more diverse, due especially to growth in the Hispanic population. Recent census estimates show Hispanic people represent about 15% of the youngest boomers compared with 8% of the oldest.

Research has shown Hispanic people and Black people are far less likely to have access to retirement plans at their jobs, compared with the non-Hispanic white population. Low pay also discourages saving, financial experts say. Many Hispanic immigrants also send savings to family members in their native country.

There is also a growing disconnect between working and accumulating wealth, the Boston College researchers found. Younger boomers were caught in the transition away from pensions, which guaranteed retirement income, in a time when 401(k) plans put the onus on users to make proactive and savvy investment decisions, said John, from the AARP’s Public Policy Institute.

Some experts and some data sources don’t see a firm divide among the boomer cohorts. Also, surging markets have aided young boomers who do have investment accounts, said Lowell Ricketts, a data scientist at the St. Louis Fed.

The Fed survey showed young boomers with 401(k) and individual retirement account plans in 2022 had more assets in them than older boomers did when they were the same age. The median for young boomers was $189,000, while the median for older boomers, nine years earlier, and adjusted for inflation, was just under $143,000. The survey doesn’t take into account the value of pensions and Social Security.

But the many young boomers without such accounts face gloomier prospects, Ricketts said, adding, “That can translate to just a diminished standard of living later in life.”

Barbara Tarallo, 62, lost her job with a software company during the 2007-09 recession. She was able to find other work, with a job she still has now doing marketing work for another software company, but at roughly half her prior salary. She still makes about $45,000 a year today while working from her Pelham, N.H., home.

She said she hasn’t been able to contribute to her retirement since then due to another major life event: a traumatic brain injury her husband, Tom Tarallo, suffered about a year after she switched to the lower-paying job.

The couple lost his higher salary and had to move homes to accommodate his wheelchair. Barbara Tarallo pays their mortgage and other household expenses from her salary and modest disability benefits related to Tom’s accident, while also caring for him. She has also dipped into their retirement savings—they have about $250,000 to $300,000—to help cover costs.

Today, living in a 55-and-up community filled with older retirees, she finds it hard to envision leaving work herself.

“I think I’ve just resigned myself to the fact that I can do this as long as I can do it and when I can’t do it anymore, I’ll cross that bridge when I get there,” Tarallo said.

That can come sooner than boomers hope. A recent study by the nonpartisan Employee Benefit Research Institute suggested people are overly optimistic about how long they can remain on the job. Issues like personal medical problems, partners’ health needs and layoffs are all potential hazards, said Craig Copeland, EBRI’s director of wealth benefits research.

Social Security can provide a financial backstop for many older Americans who otherwise might face destitution, said economist John Sabelhaus, a visiting fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. Benefits are calculated progressively, meaning the share of preretirement earnings that the benefits replace is proportionally higher for those with lower career earnings.

Someone retiring this year at full retirement age with average annual earnings of about $28,550 would get yearly benefits equal to 57%, while someone who made just over $100,000 would see 35%, according to the Social Security Administration.

Keith Seawell, 60, has no retirement savings accounts and rents the apartment near Baltimore he shares with his girlfriend and teenage daughter. He has been pulling in about $2,500 a month from a temporary administrative job and Social Security disability payments stemming from a back injury he sustained working construction and other manual-labor jobs. Disability payments eventually convert to regular Social Security benefits.

Like other young boomers, Seawell says he has no intention to retire, because he never wants his four children to have to support him financially.
“I always felt I was the one that would have to be the provider, never looked at years down the road where they would have to do for me,” he said.
Worsening back problems recently sidelined Seawell, requiring surgery. He said he hopes to rejoin the workforce after he recovers.
 
How do you manage to live through the most prosperous economic boom in history where they were throwing wealth around like crazy and have no savings?

You fucking idiots could get a three bedroom house for like a $1500 down payment.

I'm starting to think Boomers calling millennials dumb and useless was massive projection.
 
Those 55 and up control nearly 70% of U.S. household wealth, Federal Reserve data show.
"Old people have all the money, but they're also struggling to feed themselves and worry about becoming homeless!"

Something doesn't add up.
Last year, she bought a rundown two-bedroom home on nearly 2 acres that she is rehabbing with her fiancé. She hopes to at least cut back on work by age 70. To do that, she said, she will need to pay down $260,000 in home-related debt while belatedly building a retirement nest egg. Her target: $100,000.
Oh, she decided to take on hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt so she could be like the flippers she watches on TV, except she's 60 years old and probably can't lift a 2x4 without going to the emergency room.

Perhaps she shouldn't have done that.
 
I suggest a bottle of jack and a .45

If your 60 years old and you don't have at least 1 million in the bank your fucked.

A million will give you 20 years of subsistence level living but you'll have at least a roof and food but that's it. A million don't go very far now a days thanks to Bidenomics.

Really to live a comfortable middle class retirement where you can travel and help out your kids you need at least 3 million by the time your 65. Assuming you now own your house and can sell and downsize for a profit, which is getting harder and harder as housing prices spiral.

Really middle class people all over the West are royally fucked. The poors will get welfare and are used to living in shit and eating beans and rice everyday and the rich don't have a single fuck to give as they have tens of millions socked away and don't even notice inflation.

But that dude that scraped by, saving bit by bit and putting his kids through school? He's fucked. That 1 million he scrimped and saved for? Well that's about 50K a year praying no emergencies come up. 50k is not a lot of money to get by with let alone travel and enjoy life with.

The boomers enjoyed the highest COL in human history but it came at a great cost to the rest of the world.
 
The boomers enjoyed the highest COL in human history but it came at a great cost to the rest of the world.
1432250971171.png
Anonymous 01/27/15 (Tue) 16:04:20 ID: 0d7135 No.1047090
Then you need to know the ultimate red pill. The one about how you were born a slave and you will die a slave. You were brought into this world to do one thing - to produce so your parents could retire for 30 years. It sounds crazy, but let me tell you the story

In the late 1960s and early 1970s we had a bit of a problem. The fertility rate declined a hell of a lot and even went below replacement rate. Some people thought this was good since there was a lot of talk about The Population Bomb. But a few other things happened around that time which made things a bit messed up. In the US in particular we were having a civil war between the WASP Establishment and the Jews for control of the country. The Jews got the niggers all worked up and they burnt over 100 of our cities. In order to calm the niggers down we had to give them some free stuff so we created Affirmative Action and welfare. Basically we pay them to not work and to not wreck our country. It's a tax, but they were only 10% of the population and we were a rich country.

We also had all these old people who had been in the war and they thought it would be nice to give therm some free things also. So we created pensions and free medical for them.

We also gave free medical for the niggers. No big deal, since we were rich and the old people didn't live much longer than 65, which was when they stopped working.

It's an old cliche, but they say that if you want more of something, subsidize it. The free medical for the old and niggers was basically an unlimited pot of money for companies to sell life extended technologies to. The whole healthcare industry went from being tiny to a huge monster. If sounds great that grandma is going to live to 90 instead of 65, but that means she is unproductive for 25 years and someone else has to pay for her. Not to mention all the medical costs.

This huge increase in life expectancy would have been fine if grandma would have had 6 kids, but she only had 2 or less. So there were not enough productive people to pay for her.

In other words there was going to be huge inflation as demand would outstrip supply. So we tried to fix it with a little trick. We noticed that 50% of working age (white) people were not working, so we used some propaganda to get those people (women) into the workforce. But this had a negative effect that we didn't think of- women started having even less babies. So we had to think fast. We needed to drive the cost of labor down. So we tried to destroy the unions - which we did a good job at. But this was not enough. Next we tried
free trade - the idea being that more workers will drive the price of labor down and keep inflation down. It worked, but it did some negative things like destroy our manufacturing base and skills. Then we got lucky - the computer and internet was created. This created incredible efficiencies and allowed us to get more work out of each worker (productivity). But it was not enough, and the healthcare technologies kept creating more life extending things for the old people. To make matters worse, the non-productive nigger were multiplying faster than the whites, and many whites were starting to behave like niggers (not working). Crisis. We did try a few times to change the pension system for the ald people, but they went crazy (they call it the Third Rail of politics). So we went to plan Z - immigration. Wve wanted to immigrate white people, but South Africa was the only place that white were leaving from. It wasn't enough. We tried from Asia, but couldn't get enough Japanese or Koreans. So we went for the bottom of the barrel - arabs, blacks, and mestizos. Yeah we know they have IQs 1 sigma or more below white and we know that mean our economy will contract by about 30% or so. But we backed ourselves into a corner. Plus the banks really like all the debt we are getting into while we fumble with this intractable problem.

So yeah, we flushed your civilization and economy down the toilet so that we could live the high life for 530 years of retirement. You can spit on our graves | guess, but it won't matter to us much as we will have had a great ride while you get to scrounge in the ashes.

Save your civilization - remove all old people, non-productive people, and non-white people from your countries ASAP.
 
The trick is the Greatest Generation kinda deserved a lot of what they asked for.

They did fight a major world war and millions of them did die or get wounded. They came home feeling they deserved the America Dream as they fought a two sided war and won. They forged America in the Superpower it became and wanted to see the fruits of their labors.

It's not totally their fault their children squandered it all away.
 
If your 60 years old and you don't have at least 1 million in the bank your fucked.
Most people in the uk could only dream of that amount. Median salary hovers around 30k here, taxes are high, house prices and COL through the roof. Has has been over ten dollars equivalent a gallon, it’s a bit lower now but it’s always 3-4x what it is in the states. Our leftover disposable is low. To be saving a million on a median wage is a big ask.
 
Most people in the uk could only dream of that amount. Median salary hovers around 30k here, taxes are high, house prices and COL through the roof. Has has been over ten dollars equivalent a gallon, it’s a bit lower now but it’s always 3-4x what it is in the states. Our leftover disposable is low. To be saving a million on a median wage is a big ask.

This part of why I think the great recession is coming. We have so many boomers retiring but hardly any of them have the money to do so and somehow they will have to be cared for. No to mention the upcoming health care crisis as the population pyramid is about to flip you will have tonnes more older adults requiring care, expensive care long term care, that they cannot pay for and will be pushed onto a ever shrinking tax base.

I think Canada was in the lead with it's MAID program. Get people used to the idea of the elderly getting killed rather then sucking up large amounts of cash and resources. Cruel but what else can you do.

I know both the UK and Canada health care systems are on the verge of collapse right now and were only hitting the very tip of the iceberg for retiree numbers. Importing tonnes of low wage shitskins ain't going to give you a cutting edge industry in this day and age and you can't really tap minimum wage workers as a tax base. So you end up with a negative tax situation where most of your populace is now consuming tax dollars and not paying.

You will know when desperation sets in when the governments start talking about a inheritance tax. Taxing money that's already been tax twice over is a sign of the death spiral beginning.

Shit will get dark...very dark. And it will happen.
 
You will know when desperation sets in when the governments start talking about a inheritance tax.
Such a tax already exists on a federal and state level in some states. The federal exemption is pretty high but several states have much lower thresholds.

I would say the bigger red flag we are seeing is the push for a wealth tax.
 
Back