Pedophilia in the gay community - oh no, homophobia

[StraightShooter2]

Yes there is, you are not reproducing

If you mean that there isn't a biological rationale for it and the "being gay is genetic" claims, then sure.

But if you are insinuating that all forms of physical intimacy which "aren't reproducing" are wrong, that's quite a radical position, and I'm only aware of very devout Catholics who might argue this (not even most Protestants would).

 

[ryu289]

I just love how there's ten page worth of archives, screenshots, and testimonial from every site anyone's ever been to, that you're a nonce and try pushing for children in sexual scenarios to be normalized.

Which is why I am pointing out how homosexuality is not the same as pedophilia?

 

[Pentex]

I also blind linked to a faggot marxist pedophile.

Hyperlinks are not a substitute for an argument.

Lay as much claim to lesbians defending pedophiles (Stop the Witchhunt Committee) as you do to lesbians opposing pedophilia to improve their own leverage within the 'movement.' (LFL)

More dishonesty from you it seems.

Touched a nerve, did I?

 

[ryu289]

Hyperlinks are not a substitute for an argument.

It's called citing sources and you don't give any evidence they are wrong

Lay as much claim to lesbians defending pedophiles (Stop the Witchhunt Committee) as you do to lesbians opposing pedophilia to improve their own leverage within the 'movement.' (LFL)

Um you give no sources for this....at this point I assume you are just making things up

Touched a nerve, did I?

Funny, it looks like I could say the same for you.

 

[Lemmingwise]

At least not where I lived, in Chicago.

I have the image of chicago being very black, but I'm sure that's not exactly true for the suburbs. Do you think that played any role in the low acceptance of homosexuality for you growing up?

This "community" nonsense around what we like sexually needs to stop. It's gross. It protects those that deserve nothing, and endangers those who haven't lived much of a life at all.

Why quit a winning strategy? Every regime needs it commissars, its secret police, its enforcers.

The myth of calling these people a community allows them to leverage being a kind of celebrated class (among the left wing loyalists) to lead charges against everyone unwilling to submit (including small time bakers).

If they more honestly wore their secret police uniforms it's harder to do their sting operations. They're not even officially employed and therefor hard to point to any accountability.

Like I'm sure @ryu289 is not on the payroll. In fact, by being organised around sexual desires, there is simultaneously a kind of passionate fervor behind it and the fear that every engagement of that passion will be curbed if they "lose the culture war". And considering the connection to anything long term (multigenerational) is rare for sexual deviants, it's all about the materialistic here and now, the next orgasm.

So yeah, what's the incentive for the "community" to give up their PR shield? And lose their power? Sure we might end up saving some kids, but what about my discord chats with that cute 16 year old?

And be more truthful about history, how homosexuality wasn't the kind of death sentence it previously was? Like Turing, who lived in a time where it wasn't accepted to be openly gay. British intelligence was long aware of his homosexuality and put extra tabs on him for the risk this made him to be blackmailed by foreign spies.

But it wasn't until he reported a break in crime and autisticly admitted to homosexual relations in a public, legal document, that he forced the authorities hand at responding to it.

 

[Pentex]

Um you give no sources for this....at this point I assume you are just making things up

Good job revealing that you don't even read your own shit before you link it.

On February 22, 1983, the Stop the Witchhunt Committee (a group of lesbians and gay men whose aim was to defend NAMBLA in the face of state repression) co-sponsored a forum with New York University's Libertarian Student Association on "An Introduction to the Man/Boy Love Issue."

 

[Resident Evil]

I have the image of chicago being very black, but I'm sure that's not exactly true for the suburbs. Do you think that played any role in the low acceptance of homosexuality for you growing up?

Blacks and Mexicans hate fags overall, so. I'd say so. No one in general is accepting of it though.

But yes, stereotypically, the Mexican and Black population have a deep hatred for gay people. Suburbs is mostly white but they also hate fags. They just don't do anything about it. The most accepting is a very rich suburb named Schaumburg, and even then it's back handed.

 

[ryu289]

Good job revealing that you don't even read your shit before you link it.

That didn't come from any of my sources. It was from here. Also how does this prove that the gay rights movement as a whole was ok with NAMBLA until 1994 like you claim?

 

[Lemmingwise]

Did they give evidence that their fathers raped them

I ask again. What evidence do you realisticly expect someone who at 18 or so discovers that what their father did to them at 6 years old is not normal, but rape and child abuse, what evidence do you realisticly expect them to be able to produce?

Also how does this prove that the gay rights movement as a whole was ok with NAMBLA until 1994 like you claim

Nig, you yourself said they distanced themselves at that time. Could you be more dishonest?

 

[Pentex]

That didn't come from any of my sources.

LOL you actual retarded kike.

It was from here.

I know.

Give serious consideration to roping yourself.

Also, those LOL those edits.

 

[ryu289]

What evidence do you realisticly expect someone who at 18 or so discovers that what their father did to them at 6 years old is not normal, but rape and child abuse, what evidence do you realisticly expect them to be able to produce?

So how do they prove it then? You see the problem here right?

And be more truthful about history, how homosexuality wasn't the kind of death sentence it previously was?

Really? Even where it is legal, it is dangerous.

But it wasn't until he reported a break in crime and autisticly admitted to homosexual relations in a public, legal document, that he forced the authorities hand at responding to it.

So they didn't castrate him like other homosexuals but when he admitted it to cops that no longer mattered?

Give serious consideration to roping yourself.

So wait, you link to an article that points out that much of gay rights movement was growing against NAMBLA before 1994, unlike what you were claiming before (see pg. 253-254)? It shows how the gay rights movement was going out of it's way to distance itself. Also I only had the abstract before and when I looked up that quote you gave, it didn't give me the title.

Again, how does this prove that the gay rights movement as a whole was ok with NAMBLA until 1994 like you claim? Because David Thorsad, the pedo advocate and author of that paper tries to make it seem his side has more support from the gay community, than what was happening in reality.

 

[Lemmingwise]

Blacks and Mexicans hate fags overall, so. I'd say so. No one in general is accepting of it though.

But yes, stereotypically, the Mexican and Black population have a deep hatred for gay people. Suburbs is mostly white but they also hate fags. They just don't do anything about it. The most accepting is a very rich suburb named Schaumburg, and even then it's back handed.

Just in case you missed it, I added a lot to that post in an edit, in case you're interested.

I was more trying to ask how much of your experience being unaccepted came from minorities, or if they weren't much of a factor to it.

 

[Resident Evil]

Just in case you missed it, I added a lot to that post in an edit, in case you're interested.

I was more trying to ask how much of your experience being unaccepted came from minorities, or if they weren't much of a factor to it.

Minorities hated me, but I also lived in a near entirely minority population. So it don't say much.

 

[Lemmingwise]

Minorities hated me, but I also lived in a near entirely minority population. So it don't say much.

I think you mean near entirely majority?

 

[Jann_Hörn]

If you mean that there isn't a biological rationale for it and the "being gay is genetic" claims, then sure.

But if you are insinuating that all forms of physical intimacy which "aren't reproducing" are wrong, that's quite a radical position, and I'm only aware of very devout Catholics who might argue this (not even most Protestants would).

Devoting yourself to a life of not reproducing =/ sometimes having casual sex

 

[Pentex]

Also I only had the abstract before...

Reddit.
Return there.

 

[The Spice boi]

Lmfao was not expecting a cameo from @ryu289 that's for sure. This thread just got more interesting

 

[Lemmingwise]

Even where it is legal, it is dangerous

Lmao, thinking you're denied a promotion because of your sexuality is discrimination. That's not the same as dangerous. I'll repeat the question could you be any more dishonest?

So how do they prove it then? You see the problem here right?

If we remove self-reporting on victimisation, you lose almost all evidence of lgbtq victimisation. You have posted no shortage of links that use exactly that kind of data and reasoning. You undermine almost all your points by only wanting to include ironclad, court proven victimisation. Again, your intellectual dishonesty is in full display.

Yes, I don't think we should assume every claim is true, whether coming from a scientist or proclaimed rape victim. But some preponderance should be given to them. You have now admitted you don't care about about women that say they have been raped when it implicates kinsey, but you do care when it affects lgbtq of all types.

You're a political ideologue, and all your reasoning has been in favor of lgbtq and protecting pedophiles. Even while also arguing there is 0% link. Next time, try and pick a lane when you try to propagandize.

 

[ryu289]

Lmao, thinking you're denied a promotion because of your sexuality is discrimination. That's not the same as dangerous. I'll repeat the question could you be any more dishonest?

Look more

Just under 50% of trans workers said they had been passed over for a job or fired because of their gender identity.

In fact the one you quoted mentioned being fired and harassed as well.

One in four LGBTQ+ workers said they’d experienced sexual harassment at work. Just over 20% said they’d been physically harassed as well.

Nearly 60% of respondents who said they experienced discrimination or harassment said the person who abused them referenced religious beliefs as justification for doing so. According to the study, respondents told researchers, for example, they were told to pray that they were not LGBTQ+, told they were going to Hell or that they were an abomination, or being told quotes from the Bible.

True this sort of harassment is not quite the same as being thrown out of your home for being gay, or kidnapped for torture, sexual harassment seemingly everywhere, beaten by cops....

 

[Lemmingwise]

In fact the one you quoted mentioned being fired and harassed as well

We were talking about faggots, not the mentally ill. You're talking about trannies.

Nearly 60% of respondents who said they experienced discrimination or harassment

Oh so when a 6 year old girl claims to be raped, you want incontrovertible proof. But when an adult lesbian says the reason she was harassed was because she was lesbian, you take it on good faith?

I think everybody already knew what type of person you were, but thanks for eliminating every inch of doubt anyone might have still had.