Pedophilia in the gay community - oh no, homophobia

[ryu289]

We were talking about faggots, not the mentally ill. You're talking about trannies.

The article discussed lgbtq people as a whole.

Oh so when a 6 year old girl claims to be raped, you want incontrovertible proof. But when an adult lesbian says the reason she was harassed was because she was lesbian, you take it on good faith?

You said they were adults who claimed they were molested as children by people paid by Kinsey, but admitted they couldn't prove it.

Meanwhile have numerous studies showing that harassment and assult is a real thing over and over again:

Survey finds 70% of LGBT people sexually harassed at work

Study shows ‘hidden epidemic’ with BME women and those with disabilities most affected

www.theguardian.com

Link Between LGBT, Religion & Homelessness, Suicide

Being gay or in any way sexually different can be a real challenge for people who live in religious communities, and it appears that the higher the

www.patheos.com

Over 80 Percent of LGBTQ+ Service Members Report Sexual Harassment in Military

The repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” hasn’t ended discrimination in the military.

www.them.us

Bullying and suicide risk among sexual minority youth in the United States

Bullying is associated with increased suicide risk and maladaptive development for sexual minority youth (SMY). The purpose of this study is to determ…

www.sciencedirect.com

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ppc.12398

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224499.2019.1591334

SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals

Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

journals.sagepub.com

I think everybody already knew what type of person you were, but thanks for eliminating every inch of doubt anyone might have still had.

Your tu quoque doesn't work here.

 

[Lemmingwise]

You said they were adults who claimed they were molested as children by people paid by Kinsey, but admitted they couldn't prove it.

False. The link between kinsey and their abuser was provable. It's just that the rape wasn't. You have continually dodged the question how an adult could prove that they were raped by their parent when they were 6.

Your tu quoque doesn't work here.

Muh fallacy fallacy.

Stop raping kids. Stop defending pedophiles.

 

[ryu289]

Muh fallacy fallacy.

You don't show how it is though. Nice try deflecting and ignoring the rest of my comments.

 

[Lemmingwise]

You don't show how it is though. Nice try deflecting and ignoring the rest of my comments.

Nor have you for any of the times you claimed x fallacy.



You've already admitted to:

1. Having different standards of proof for adult lgbtq members losing job opportunities than for underage rape victims
2. Finding the former more necessary to defend and the latter to attack
3. Not reading studies, just their abstracts
4. Ignoring the self reporting of homosexuals in this thread because they disagree with you


Why don't you quit while you're behind before you embarrass yourself further?




Lmao, the great defender of "there is no link between lgbtq and pedofilia" after pages of links defending lgbtq.

Also, thank you for proving my point, by example, better than any of my argumentation and sourcing would be able to do.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

There's nothing inherently wrong with same sex attraction.

There is. It is a mental illness like pedophilia, and that's why they're commonly found together. Does the word "comorbidity" mean anything to you?

 

[The Spice boi]

Lol is @ryu289 even gay?

If no, fuck off. We don't want your help. Jesus fucking Christ people like you are 90% of the problem.

 

[Lemmingwise]

Lol is @ryu289 even gay?

If no, fuck off. We don't want your help. Jesus fucking Christ people like you are 90% of the problem.

I think it's a tranny, judging from some of the links posted on his profile.

Although the fact that you wouldn't tell him to fuck off if he was gay, doesn't exactly help your position either

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

There is. It is a mental illness like pedophilia, and that's why they're commonly found together. Does that word "comorbidity" mean anything to you?

It doesn't hurt anyone, though. It's possible to be gay and not diddle kids or spread STDs.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

It doesn't hurt anyone, though. It's possible to be gay and not diddle kids or spread STDs.

Oh, sure. It's also possible to be a violent criminal and not a nigger, but those crime stats aren't going away.

 

[The Spice boi]

I think it's a tranny, judging from some of the links posted on his profile.

Although the fact that you wouldn't tell him to fuck off if he was gay, doesn't exactly help your position either

Tbh he's just so fucking smug and annoying. I'd probably put my dick in a beehive to get him to go away. Any excuse will do lol

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

Oh, sure. It's also possible to be a violent criminal and not a nigger, but those crime stats aren't going away.

It's also possible to be male and not violent even though males make up the vast majority of violent criminals.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

It's also possible to be male and not violent even though males make up the vast majority of violent criminals.

Absolutely, but there's a bit of a difference there, like with sexual assault. There's a lot of factors for why most rapists are men, not least of which is their superior physical strength compared to women, not that rape is inherent to men. You can't just look at numbers, you need to logically analyze this stuff and observe the world.

Observing gays, it's known that they're generally sexual deviants, and that's inherent unlike men being violent criminals or sexual predators. That's why diseases are so common among them, why they have an astronomical number of sexual partners, and, coming back around to the topic at hand, why most pedophiles are faggots.

 

[ryu289]

Nor have you for any of the times you claimed x fallacy.

I did I pointed out:

You said they were adults who claimed they were molested as children by people paid by Kinsey, but admitted they couldn't prove it.

Meanwhile have numerous studies showing that harassment and assult is a real thing over and over again

Something which you sidestep:

1. Having different standards of proof for adult lgbtq members losing job opportunities than for underage rape victims

So I point out more than just losing job opportunities with numerous studies, but you ignore it? Meanwhile you said:

What evidence do you realisticly expect someone who at 18 or so discovers that what their father did to them at 6 years old is not normal, but rape and child abuse, what evidence do you realisticly expect them to be able to produce?

This is different than simply using a questionnaire like in the studies I mentioned.

3. Not reading studies, just their abstracts

As I explained:

So wait, you link to an article that points out that much of gay rights movement was growing against NAMBLA before 1994, unlike what you were claiming before (see pg. 253-254)? It shows how the gay rights movement was going out of it's way to distance itself. Also I only had the abstract before and when I looked up that quote you gave, it didn't give me the title.

Oh so when a 6 year old girl claims to be raped, you want incontrovertible proof.

You said they were adults making these claims decades after the fact:

What evidence do you realisticly expect someone who at 18 or so discovers that what their father did to them at 6 years old is not normal, but rape and child abuse, what evidence do you realisticly expect them to be able to produce?

If we remove self-reporting on victimisation, you lose almost all evidence of lgbtq victimisation. You have posted no shortage of links that use exactly that kind of data and reasoning. You undermine almost all your points by only wanting to include ironclad, court proven victimisation. Again, your intellectual dishonesty is in full display.

The fact that the results of these surveys (that usually have generalized questions)more or less repeat similiar results over and over, and over, raises a question, how many times does similiar results have to repeat before you admit that bias doesn't seem to be an issue here. These results are very similar to those found in other surveys as well as results gathered historically. This pattern of consistency supports the validity of the results

This is different than someone accusing another of a crime, as the later requires a preponderance of evidence.

Lmao, the great defender of "there is no link between lgbtq and pedofilia" after pages of links defending lgbtq

Yeah that was a troll. Here is the real thing:

Amazing how you fall for it.

4. Ignoring the self reporting of homosexuals in this thread because they disagree with you

...where?

 

[Lemmingwise]

Yeah that was a troll. Here is the real thing:

So only the other one was true. Just adolescents. I guess we'll be watching the news until we see you come by and rape your mom.

 

[Lemmingwise]

There's a lot of factors for why most rapists are men, not least of which is their superior physical strength compared to women,

I think it is one of the least reasons. Humans are toolusers. If women had has much desire and will to rape, they could use guns, knives, blackmail.

 

[The Spice boi]

I think it is one of the least reasons. Humans are toolusers. If women had has much desire and will to rape, they could use guns, knives, blackmail.

This, not to mention that rape is very common in the animal kingdom, and a very useful reproductive strategy - if you can't get a female to willingly bear your children, then forcing her to works just as well.

Gross but nature doesn't really give a fuck about human sensibilities

 

[Gimmick Account]

I think it is one of the least reasons. Humans are toolusers. If women had has much desire and will to rape, they could use guns, knives, blackmail.

That's still an extra hoop to go through. If macaroni and cheese came out of my natural physiology I'd eat it every day. But since I have to go all the way downstairs to the supermarket to get it it's usually only like six days a week.

It's pretty hard to separate out physicality and genetic/sexual economics like this. To the point that it's kinda moot. Men are more motivated and competent and do more shit in general, perhaps. Whether it's purely physiological or down to competitive imperative to whatever degree it's probably pointless to make comparisons this specific with one particular subset of men in isolation.

 

[Lemmingwise]

That's still an extra hoop to go through. If macaroni and cheese came out of my natural physiology I'd eat it every day. But since I have to go all the way downstairs to the supermarket to get it it's usually only like six days a week.

It's pretty hard to separate out physicality and genetic/sexual economics like this. To the point that it's kinda moot. Men are more motivated and competent and do more shit in general, perhaps. Whether it's purely physiological or down to competitive imperative to whatever degree it's probably pointless to make comparisons this specific with one particular subset of men in isolation.

Considering the difference between men and women in theft crime, violence crime and sex crime is somewhat comparable, I always assumed that the underlying cause is similar and probably testosterone/risk driven rather than mainly related to body strength.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

I think it is one of the least reasons. Humans are toolusers. If women had has much desire and will to rape, they could use guns, knives, blackmail.

That requires a substantially higher amount of effort and planning, with a higher rate of failure. All a man needs to do is follow a woman foolish enough to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Their need to rape is also virtually non-existent, obviously (rape isn't all about power like feminists suggest, it's an inherently sexual act but they want to divorce the action from sex--I am not saying there's not an element of power but it is not usually the main motive).

One of the biggest reasons women don't rape much is the physical logistics of it, men are simply better equipped to, so to speak (although sexual assault more broadly is just as possible).

I don't know about this part, but I'd also assume male on male rape is typically committed against smaller, physically weaker men for similar reasons.

 

[Lemmingwise]

That requires a substantially higher amount of effort and planning, with a higher rate of failure. All a man needs to do is follow a woman foolish enough to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Their need to rape is also virtually non-existent, obviously (rape isn't all about power like feminists suggest, it's an inherently sexual act but they want to divorce the action from sex--I am not saying there's not an element of power but it is not usually the main motive).

One of the biggest reasons women don't rape much is the physical logistics of it, men are simply better equipped to, so to speak (although sexual assault more broadly is just as possible).

I don't know about this part, but I'd also assume male on male rape is typically committed against smaller, physically weaker men for similar reasons.

Mostly agree.

My instincts/intuition tells me that male on male rape achieves assymetry typically through group vs single.

A (very) casual look at the stats suggest the most common types of male rape is that of children, inside prisons and during war (typically of prisoners). So... yeah. Circled right back to the original topic.