Covid/mRNA Vaccine Info General - "Covid Seasonal Flu Vaccines is Society's New Normal" - FDA

Please remember that this is the assessment of accredited physicians, made legally permissible by law makers, in the actual country of Canada, which does in fact exist in real life--where you live, awake, reading this right now. This is not a fever dream. This is not delusion. This is real life...cuz COVID?
heroine.png
 
Please remember that this is the assessment of accredited physicians, made legally permissible by law makers, in the actual country of Canada, which does in fact exist in real life--where you live, awake, reading this right now. This is not a fever dream. This is not delusion. This is real life...cuz COVID?
View attachment 2553325
Screenshot_20210924-121023~2.png

Rates of depression and despair are through the roof all over the world because of the psychotic, inhumane response to the supposed existential threat of Covid--hardly shocking that people would be dying from self-medication gone wrong more than ever as well. Will they start prescribing premium vodka and cigarettes next? I hear those can help take the edge off anxiety too
 
Last edited:
This thread is so much more tolerable if certain people have the ignore button applied. :biggrin: seethe, cope and dilate you fat hospital Jannie.
Lol fragile anti-vax retard can't handle seeing opinions he doesn't agree with. Baw harder, pussy. Or go back to /pol/ so you won't have to see posts that give you prickly wicklies
 
Last edited:
Lol fragile anti-vax retard can't handle seeing opinions he doesn't agree with. Baw harder, pussy. Or go back to /pol/ so you won't have to see posts that give you prickly wicklies
Boring.

OOPSIES! OUR BAD TEEHEE! TRUST THE SOYENCE!
1714889A-86F5-4BA2-B80A-F008EA896732.jpeg



ETA: added PDF of the New England Journal of Medicine Editorial for easy reading and archiving.
They killed babies in their rush to get people vaccinated.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Boring.

OOPSIES! OUR BAD TEEHEE! TRUST THE SOYENCE!
View attachment 2553924



ETA: added PDF of the New England Journal of Medicine Editorial for easy reading and archiving.
They killed babies in their rush to get people vaccinated.
What did that have to do with my post?

I know you want the vaccine to fail because you're a retard, but if you actually read the study you linked, it doesn't say it's unsafe, just that there wasn't enough data in the study to determine that it was safe (although from the data in the study, it was safe, it's just that they need a bigger sample size). So your whole "they killed babies in their rush to get people vaccinated" is not correct (although rarely anything you post is correct, so at least you're consistent here)

Again, I know you're a retard who wants the vaccine to fail just like a good little right-wing spaz, but you should actually read the study before you post it as some kind of autistic GOTCHYA because you're making it way too easy to debunk your retardedness.

PROTIP: Don't get science information from the gateway pundit of all things
 
The relevant article:

Among 827 registry participants who reported a completed pregnancy, 104 experienced spontaneous abortions and 1 had a stillbirth. A total of 712 pregnancies (86.1%) resulted in a live birth, mostly among participants who received their first vaccination dose in the third trimester. Among live-born infants, the incidences of preterm birth (9.4%), small size for gestational age (3.2%), and congenital anomalies (2.2%) were consistent with those expected on the basis of published literature. There were no neonatal deaths. These are reassuring data based on reports from pregnant women mostly vaccinated in the third trimester.

Given that there was a relatively small number of completed pregnancies and that live births were typically after vaccination in the third trimester, Shimabukuro et al. acknowledge the limitations in their ability to draw conclusions about spontaneous abortions, congenital anomalies, and other potential rare neonatal outcomes. Despite these limitations, this report provides important information that was not previously available.

Reference for typical rates of miscarriage

I don't think it's helpful to spread misinformation concerning serious topics such as pregnancy, whether it was intentional or not. They linked to the source directly, quoted it even, and still chose to publish it with such a sensationalist headline, it is pretty disgusting to play with the worries of potential mothers and fathers like this and maybe even put them at risk in the end. This isn't science, this is about getting clicks and everyone involved in this article should be ashamed of themselves.

The data is inconclusive, that is all that can be said at the moment. If you'd like to change something about this, report your pregnancy to the responsible statisticians or convince your pregnant friends/relatives to do it, please. And probably also don't get your information from news sites no one ever heard of with subtitles like "we report the truth".

The Hulk's justified for once, and you not checking the sources made it possible :p
 
The relevant article:





Reference for typical rates of miscarriage

I don't think it's helpful to spread misinformation concerning serious topics such as pregnancy, whether it was intentional or not. They linked to the source directly, quoted it even, and still chose to publish it with such a sensationalist headline, it is pretty disgusting to play with the worries of potential mothers and fathers like this and maybe even put them at risk in the end. This isn't science, this is about getting clicks and everyone involved in this article should be ashamed of themselves.

The data is inconclusive, that is all that can be said at the moment. If you'd like to change something about this, report your pregnancy to the responsible statisticians or convince your pregnant friends/relatives to do it, please. And probably also don't get your information from news sites no one ever heard of with subtitles like "we report the truth".

The Hulk's justified for once, and you not checking the sources made it possible :p
That still neglects the sincere qualms about the conclusions on miscarriage rates pointed out by Dr. Hong Sun's letter to NEJM on the same day as the retraction, which have as of yet not been addressed by Shimabukuro. Namely, that the time of vaccination was mingled between cohorts for the final analysis and wasn't followed through properly, when it actually should have been compared only across similar cohorts (e.g. only looking at 1st trimester vs. 1st trimester, 2nd vs, 2nd, 3rd vs. 3rd instead of lumping them all together in one number and claiming the circumstances are the same).
 

Attachments

  • 1632169466144.png
    1632169466144.png
    84 KB · Views: 49
That's from the group lead by the woman who thinks that diseases are caused by demon sperm. If you take anything they say seriously, you are a retard. Then again, you're likely an anti-vaxer who wants the vaccines to fail, so you being a retard is probably a given.
 
So can someone explain to me why the whole "Vaccinated outnumber the unvaccinated" thing is bullshit? They claim that most of the people hospitalized are unvaccinated, but others claim it's mainly vaccinated that are.

I get that it could be due to a lot of people being vaccinated...but if that's the case, doesn't that mean it's not doing it's job?

Plus again, why do you people trust the MSM who lie all the time over other sources? Cuz your ego gets stroked by them while the other less mainstream sources are more likely to get mocked?
 
Archive (240P):

Health care workers who receive and pass on too many adverse event reports following the Covid shots are essentially told to STFU by their superiors, because honestly describing just how bad things look contributes to "vaccine hesitancy". The official establishment goal is injecting pretty much all of us ASAP--negative data obviously makes people more cautious and hinders this goal, so there's a clear conflict of interest and motive to suppress certain data.
 
Isn’t the burden of proof on him to prove it does ”fuck all”? You can’t prove a negative. You could point to India using ivermectin, or anecdotally to Joe Rogan using it as his doctor told him to and getting better.

Liberals lubing up the narrative to admit the vaccine is dangerous/doesn’t work, but it’s all ok, because we have a scapegoat. Not that I disagree, Trump is an absolute retard for pushing this, but dems were quite happy to take over his work.3A383C79-05B8-40CB-8D17-AB54AE7CFC8A.jpegC93F9572-297E-438D-9FC9-67C4536D62B6.jpeg
 
Can someone present to me any evidence than Ivermectin does "Fuck all" for Covid? Someone whose a raging liberal in a server I am on (discord) said it doesn't work for Covid while calling ranting about evil bigoted right wingers.
It probably won’t matter, since their position was likely reached by tribal allegiance rather than reason, and it’s generally impossible to reason someone out of a position they didn’t use reason to arrive at, but this page summarizes and collects the evidence in support of ivermectin for COVID: https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/
 
That's from the group lead by the woman who thinks that diseases are caused by demon sperm. If you take anything they say seriously, you are a retard. Then again, you're likely an anti-vaxer who wants the vaccines to fail, so you being a retard is probably a given.
Demon sperm seems to be what you are guzzling for this retarded take. I don't want the vaccines to fail on the contrary i want them to be developed properly under the at least 10 years of clinical trials that they require. Something undertested is indeed really dangerous. Even if we take what you said as a hypothetical truth, the guys creds are legit and this guilt by association that you fall back to just to shoot the messenger because you can't deal with the message is really pathetic.
 
Demon sperm seems to be what you are guzzling for this retarded take. I don't want the vaccines to fail on the contrary i want them to be developed properly under the at least 10 years of clinical trials that they require. Something undertested is indeed really dangerous. Even if we take what you said as a hypothetical truth, the guys creds are legit and this guilt by association that you fall back to just to shoot the messenger because you can't deal with the message is really pathetic.
So you think demon sperm is what causes disease? I knew you were a tard, but man...
 
Back