- Joined
- Dec 17, 2018
This thread is so much more tolerable if certain people have the ignore button applied.
seethe, cope and dilate you fat hospital Jannie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please remember that this is the assessment of accredited physicians, made legally permissible by law makers, in the actual country of Canada, which does in fact exist in real life--where you live, awake, reading this right now. This is not a fever dream. This is not delusion. This is real life...cuz COVID?
View attachment 2553325
Lol fragile anti-vax retard can't handle seeing opinions he doesn't agree with. Baw harder, pussy. Or go back to /pol/ so you won't have to see posts that give you prickly wickliesThis thread is so much more tolerable if certain people have the ignore button applied.seethe, cope and dilate you fat hospital Jannie.
Boring.Lol fragile anti-vax retard can't handle seeing opinions he doesn't agree with. Baw harder, pussy. Or go back to /pol/ so you won't have to see posts that give you prickly wicklies
What did that have to do with my post?Boring.
OOPSIES! OUR BAD TEEHEE! TRUST THE SOYENCE!
View attachment 2553924
![]()
What? New England Journal of Medicine Backtracks - Now Admits COVID Vax May Not Be Safe for Pregnant Women
The esteemed New England Journal of Medicine posted a correction last week and now admits the COVID vaccine may not be safe for pregnant women. The study was updated after it found that 104 of 827 pregnant participants experienced a spontaneous abortion after receiving the COVID vaccine. That is...www.thegatewaypundit.com
ETA: added PDF of the New England Journal of Medicine Editorial for easy reading and archiving.
They killed babies in their rush to get people vaccinated.
Among 827 registry participants who reported a completed pregnancy, 104 experienced spontaneous abortions and 1 had a stillbirth. A total of 712 pregnancies (86.1%) resulted in a live birth, mostly among participants who received their first vaccination dose in the third trimester. Among live-born infants, the incidences of preterm birth (9.4%), small size for gestational age (3.2%), and congenital anomalies (2.2%) were consistent with those expected on the basis of published literature. There were no neonatal deaths. These are reassuring data based on reports from pregnant women mostly vaccinated in the third trimester.
Given that there was a relatively small number of completed pregnancies and that live births were typically after vaccination in the third trimester, Shimabukuro et al. acknowledge the limitations in their ability to draw conclusions about spontaneous abortions, congenital anomalies, and other potential rare neonatal outcomes. Despite these limitations, this report provides important information that was not previously available.
That still neglects the sincere qualms about the conclusions on miscarriage rates pointed out by Dr. Hong Sun's letter to NEJM on the same day as the retraction, which have as of yet not been addressed by Shimabukuro. Namely, that the time of vaccination was mingled between cohorts for the final analysis and wasn't followed through properly, when it actually should have been compared only across similar cohorts (e.g. only looking at 1st trimester vs. 1st trimester, 2nd vs, 2nd, 3rd vs. 3rd instead of lumping them all together in one number and claiming the circumstances are the same).The relevant article:
Reference for typical rates of miscarriage
I don't think it's helpful to spread misinformation concerning serious topics such as pregnancy, whether it was intentional or not. They linked to the source directly, quoted it even, and still chose to publish it with such a sensationalist headline, it is pretty disgusting to play with the worries of potential mothers and fathers like this and maybe even put them at risk in the end. This isn't science, this is about getting clicks and everyone involved in this article should be ashamed of themselves.
The data is inconclusive, that is all that can be said at the moment. If you'd like to change something about this, report your pregnancy to the responsible statisticians or convince your pregnant friends/relatives to do it, please. And probably also don't get your information from news sites no one ever heard of with subtitles like "we report the truth".
The Hulk's justified for once, and you not checking the sources made it possible :p
Archive (480P):I urge you to watch the video to the end.
![]()
A PATHOLOGIST SUMMARY OF WHAT THESE JABS DO TO THE BRAIN AND OTHER ORGANS
Ryan Cole MD AFLDS PHYSICIAN A scientific clarification of what these injections do in the head and other organs of the vaccinated peoplerumble.com
Post Investigational Vaccine Deaths
Where are the autopsies?
Ryan N. Cole, MD, FCAP, AP/CP/DP
That's from the group lead by the woman who thinks that diseases are caused by demon sperm. If you take anything they say seriously, you are a retard. Then again, you're likely an anti-vaxer who wants the vaccines to fail, so you being a retard is probably a given.
It probably won’t matter, since their position was likely reached by tribal allegiance rather than reason, and it’s generally impossible to reason someone out of a position they didn’t use reason to arrive at, but this page summarizes and collects the evidence in support of ivermectin for COVID: https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/Can someone present to me any evidence than Ivermectin does "Fuck all" for Covid? Someone whose a raging liberal in a server I am on (discord) said it doesn't work for Covid while calling ranting about evil bigoted right wingers.
Demon sperm seems to be what you are guzzling for this retarded take. I don't want the vaccines to fail on the contrary i want them to be developed properly under the at least 10 years of clinical trials that they require. Something undertested is indeed really dangerous. Even if we take what you said as a hypothetical truth, the guys creds are legit and this guilt by association that you fall back to just to shoot the messenger because you can't deal with the message is really pathetic.That's from the group lead by the woman who thinks that diseases are caused by demon sperm. If you take anything they say seriously, you are a retard. Then again, you're likely an anti-vaxer who wants the vaccines to fail, so you being a retard is probably a given.
So you think demon sperm is what causes disease? I knew you were a tard, but man...Demon sperm seems to be what you are guzzling for this retarded take. I don't want the vaccines to fail on the contrary i want them to be developed properly under the at least 10 years of clinical trials that they require. Something undertested is indeed really dangerous. Even if we take what you said as a hypothetical truth, the guys creds are legit and this guilt by association that you fall back to just to shoot the messenger because you can't deal with the message is really pathetic.
Judging by the specimen i have infront of me... yes it doesSo you think demon sperm is what causes disease? I knew you were a tard, but man...
No but HHH guzzles demon semen and seems pretty diseaseddude, you found an actual demon? is it a succubus?
does it like chips?