Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)
- Thread starter Borscht
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2019
Rutherford Birchard Hayes, aka His Fraudulency I, totally stole that election.
As for Hilldawg, so much of a loser she didn't even get a smoke-filled room to steal 2016.
MrJokerRager
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
Im sure the guy in charge of the NKVD was such a notorious pedo, he was first in line to get shot after Stalin was poisoned and his crimes are hidden in the Soviet Archives to this day.
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2021
Someone needs to update Bill Gates's wiki entry now.
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2021
I still don't understand what AOC was crying about. Is she upset that it failed or upset that she didn't want to change her vote but did? I'm glad we got delicious tears, and I hope she tries to salvage this through Insta. Although I'm thinking this is a bigger landmine for her than the Met, so if she's smart she'll shut up about it.
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2021
I'm pretty sure she was crying because her opinion of her own importance (inflated by media attention) got squashed like a cockroach in a very public manner.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2019
I'm pretty sure she was probably upset that all of her donors got the same phone call all at once that if they valued their credit scores they would tell that bitch to shut her pie hole.
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2018
Sure was. However, a good bit of info about his crimes was released, in order to thoroughly discredit him. Khrushchev also used the offing of Beria to start dismantling the GULAG system, while ensuring there would be no more Stalin-style purges.
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2018
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2018
All of those plus her little stunt backfiring on her in such a humiliating way and the fact that one of the things Congress can reliably agree on is giving money to Our Greatest Ally lmao. Oh well, taxpayer dollars go to such an unfathomable amount of ridiculous and inane things these days that a billion to some cool Jew missiles and to make AOC cry barely registers.
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
It was inevitable once the civil war kicked off. She's the most public of the Progs and needed to be put in her place to give the Establishment some breathing room. It's not a bad move, but whoever decided to do it will know what it means. It gives them breathing room, but is very public. The Progs will seek vengeance, equally as public. Does this herald the end of the civil war being quiet? Or was it merely a public move to provide room for a plan? I do not know, but those are the two likely options.
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2018
I think there's a lot of the shadow government that feels like the water's already boiling so it's time to just poke the citizenry with a knife to finish things off.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2019
Why is the energy of this post so threatening.I'd like to see AOC crying after meeting the horse.
Garth
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2018
That is still far too risky. They certainly want to, but they have to find a way to disarm a significant percentage of the citizenry. Predators in the wild have a strong sense of self preservation. Those that survive appreciate that there are times it's better to starve a little longer than to risk critical injury. Stirring the pot before disarming both legal and illegal gun owners would be suicide. They are vastly outnumbered and if they make such a blatant move they immediately create a multitude of enemies that they will have to seek out and eradicate. With inflation on the rise, supply chains stifled, both sides of the wuflu argument, etc., the general populace is feeling more and more backed into a corner. My purely subjective opinion is bring it glowies. If it's all going down the shitter anyway, give me just one good reason. Please.
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
They are not coming to take your guns... -that- directly. Leaving aside the fact it would be challenged and SCOTUS is increasingly hostile, and that'd affect every state so good luck -not- having SCOTUS have to take it up due to conflicting rulings. The precedent is so painfully clear here it would fail basically immediatly.
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2018
Hey I feel you man but at the end of the day isn't it all actuary tables? How much risk? What's it worth to do it now instead of in ten years when there might be more emboldening? Think about the Normandy invasion. Setting aside the war in the east for a minute, focusing on just that theater, when was the right time to invade? When the Germans were weak...but not weak enough? When would they be weaker? Or would they become stronger? The decision to bring the hammer down on US citizens is going to be made like that. Not when there's zero chance of violent bloodshed, but when the rewards outweigh the damage that will be done. I'm not saying they're right, I'm saying that I think there's a bunch of them that think that this is the point where "Meh, we'll get a bloodied nose in the process, but you can't make an omelet..." and just come in full on.
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2019
And this is without signature verification.
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
Kicking off a civil war that the federal government -would- lose is hardly going to be any sort of beneficial analysis. About half the states would declare such an attempt as unconstitutional and ignore it right off the bat, and create a situation where the only method of enforcing it would be to send in the army.
So the federal government would immediately be in the position of "Either back down and totally destroy themselves internally, or start the civil war"
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2021
Also kind of noteworthy that Dems got up and publicly shamed Tlaib for calling Israel apartheid. Jewish conservatives never thought that would happen bc of how many times they've let Omar slide, so they seemed genuinely impressed with some of the representatives today. I would say they all got the greenlight from someone (Pelosi) to bully the Squad.
Can't imagine Nancy's happy that they tried to change the subject while Infrastructure/Debt Ceiling/Gov't Shutdown is on the horizon.
Can't imagine Nancy's happy that they tried to change the subject while Infrastructure/Debt Ceiling/Gov't Shutdown is on the horizon.
- Joined
- May 18, 2020
It was purely performative theatrics. AOC is comped, whether by Pelosi or another faction is ?, But she is either no longer a true believer of the progressive faction or she never was. Same shit with the border and her tearful displays under Trump, but she has been mostly quiet on it under Biden, nowhere near the same amount of attention.
Yet there are a ton of thirsty progressives and retard tier faggots who are STILL defending her.
She didn't have to change her vote based on anything pragmatic, as the measure was already destined to pass. She could have stuck with "no" and her retard progressive supporters would have eaten it up - but the image of that would have been problematic for Pelosi, especially if the Israelis took enough issue with them to turn against the Dems and support the republicans wholeheartedly again. They're playing a very dangerous dancing game on a razor wire though because in doing this they risked causing yet another international fuckup with yet another ally. So instead, she did the next best thing she could do and changed her vote so she could save her skin with Pelosi and the Jews, but put on a crying display so her progressive retards would be fooled into thinking "well she tried but they just keep holding her down!"
- Status