Are you getting the vaccine? - Absolute trashfire thread, please enter with caution

Did you know the CDC is having trouble getting all their employees vaccinated? Did you know they just approved a booster the FDA refused to approve because it was far too dangerous? Which agency should I trust?
Citation needed on both.

Stop believing shit your boomer uncle posts on Facebook. Remember when your mom told you to not believe everything you read on the internet? Well, that applies today, too
 

 

That was from back in May, retard.

And again, I know you are an anti-vax retard, but they didn't not approve because it was "dangerous", they did because they didn't know the safety of a booster shot.

I know you are a schizo who believes everything you read on Facebook and thus think everyone taking the vaccine will die, but it's really not dangerous. Again, I know this will blow your schizo mind, but they're safe. Billions of people have gotten it.

And again, I will ask you: what makes you more qualified on this subject than 99% of doctors and scientists world-wide? What do you know that they don't?

I notice you didn't answer that question. Gee, I wonder why
 
That was from back in May, retard.

And again, I know you are an anti-vax retard, but they didn't not approve because it was "dangerous", they did because they didn't know the safety of a booster shot.

I know you are a schizo who believes everything you read on Facebook and thus think everyone taking the vaccine will die, but it's really not dangerous. Again, I know this will blow your schizo mind, but they're safe. Billions of people have gotten it.

And again, I will ask you: what makes you more qualified on this subject than 99% of doctors and scientists world-wide? What do you know that they don't?

I notice you didn't answer that question. Gee, I wonder why
They didn't approve it for general because it's too risky to give about freely. The CDC still pushed it through for their corporate owners. Did you see their leaks where they had more people dying of the boosters in some groups than were being saved?

This thing where you guys say we think we're more qualified than the experts is a manipulative trick-- you're trying to get us to put on a show to validate your claims against us. We don't TRUST them. What's happened wherever an expert doesn't push the "right" opinions on lockdowns, social directing, COVID treatments, and so on?

So what if billions have gotten it? Heart issues and strokes have skyrocketed since it came out, and it's been in use for less than a year. Drugs have been pulled for issues that popped up YEARS after they were put out. It normally takes YEARS to get a medical product approved. These were pushed through in less than a year, and now we need to get endless boosters already. See those two hotshots at the FDA resign because they didn't agree with the push for boosters?

Also, stop howling about Facebook. I don't have one.
 
These people have enough influence to get away with plenty of ugliness.
Reminds me of the "esteemed" Dr. Stanley Plotkin's deposition in January 2018, namely this part:
If vaccines were really so safe all along then why couldn't he just test them on random children? Why did he go out of his way to test them on the mentally retarded, poor, orphans, those under colonial rule? It doesn't take a genius to figure out why: developers knew the risks of vaccine injury were very real, and they chose test subjects least likely to kick up a fuss (or be taken seriously if they/their caretakers did) when things went wrong. They always frame testing on the less fortunate as being some kind of generous exercise in humanitarianism, when in reality they've been using these people as human shields. Utilitarian sociopaths--the ends justify the means to them.

Great to know such an honest, caring man like Plotkin has been involved in development of the coof shots too
 
Last edited:
They didn't approve it for general because it's too risky to give about freely. The CDC still pushed it through for their corporate owners.
They didn't approve the booster shot until more testing is done. They approved the first (and second for the ones that require it).

Did you see their leaks where they had more people dying of the boosters in some groups than were being saved?
No, citation needed.

This thing where you guys say we think we're more qualified than the experts is a manipulative trick-- you're trying to get us to put on a show to validate your claims against us. We don't TRUST them. What's happened wherever an expert doesn't push the "right" opinions on lockdowns, social directing, COVID treatments, and so on?
Right, but what makes you think you know something they don't? 99% of doctors world-wide are in agreement that the vaccine is good and well worth the risk. Are you really autistic enough to think that 99% of doctors and scientists are in on some world-wide conspiracy? Please. You can't be that stupid. That's even stupider than thinking you know more about it than they do. Stop spending so much time listening to conspiracy schizos on the internet.

So what if billions have gotten it? Heart issues and strokes have skyrocketed since it came out, and it's been in use for less than a year. Drugs have been pulled for issues that popped up YEARS after they were put out. It normally takes YEARS to get a medical product approved. These were pushed through in less than a year, and now we need to get endless boosters already. See those two hotshots at the FDA resign because they didn't agree with the push for boosters?

Also, stop howling about Facebook. I don't have one.
Again, stop believing shit your boomer uncle tells you. Let's see sources of your claims (particularly "heart issues and strokes have skyrocketed since it came out"). I know, you are a /pol/ regular and you have autism so you are more susceptible to believing conspiracy theories, but stop believing boomer shit just because some schizo posted it on the internet.
 
I don't understand why you're tardraging about the term Big Pharma

Hello my fellow unjabbed. I will explain why vaccines and Big Pharma tends to annoy folks.

There actually is no such thing as "Big Pharma". You're conflating those who dedicate their lives to discovering cures with the malevolent profiteers who brought us the opioid crisis.

It is one thing to be skeptical. It is another to just be contrarian.
 
Hello my fellow unjabbed. I will explain why vaccines and Big Pharma tends to annoy folks.

There actually is no such thing as "Big Pharma". You're conflating those who dedicate their lives to discovering cures with the malevolent profiteers who brought us the opioid crisis.

It is one thing to be skeptical. It is another to just be contrarian.

How am I being contrarian? Isn't it odd those those wonderful experts do whatever the funding them want? Have you heard of the replication crisis?

They didn't approve the booster shot until more testing is done. They approved the first (and second for the ones that require it).


No, citation needed.


Right, but what makes you think you know something they don't? 99% of doctors world-wide are in agreement that the vaccine is good and well worth the risk. Are you really autistic enough to think that 99% of doctors and scientists are in on some world-wide conspiracy? Please. You can't be that stupid. That's even stupider than thinking you know more about it than they do. Stop spending so much time listening to conspiracy schizos on the internet.


Again, stop believing shit your boomer uncle tells you. Let's see sources of your claims (particularly "heart issues and strokes have skyrocketed since it came out"). I know, you are a /pol/ regular and you have autism so you are more susceptible to believing conspiracy theories, but stop believing boomer shit just because some schizo posted it on the internet.
The experts pushed heinous things before to keep their licenses and make money.



I'll provide two now, but you need yo tel me what proof you'll accept, and provide evidence 99% of doctors support this.
 
Reminds me of the "esteemed" Dr. Stanley Plotkin's deposition in January 2018, namely this part:
If vaccines were really so safe all along then why couldn't he just test them on random people? Why did he go out of his way to test them on the mentally retarded, poor, orphans, those under colonial rule? It doesn't take a genius to figure out why: developers knew the risks of vaccine injury were very real, and they chose test subjects least likely to kick up a fuss (or be taken seriously if they did) when things went wrong. Utilitarian sociopaths--the ends justifed the means to them.

Great to know such an honest, caring man like Plotkin has been involved in development of the coof shots too
80a.jpg
 
There's a problem where the results of a lot of research can't be replicated.
To be fair that's waaaaayyyy more an issue in the social "sciences" than in the hard sciences, and even in the hard sciences its like theoretical physics and climate modelling that make up a disproportionately high fraction of the replication crisis.

Of course this is KiwiFarms where some of the same people who talk about the replication crisis are sperging out over in the La Palma thread citing Ward & Day (2001) as the holy gospel, in spite of all the papers finding it to be a dubious overestimation.
 
Look, don't get jabbed. That's fine.

Just please don't go around in meatspace saying this shit. You will be rightfully shunned as a crazy person.
The majority of people in real life that I’ve met are skeptical of it. I’ve gotten plenty of vaccines, even some obscure ones for third world travel. Why would I get one that’s been pushed through so fast and without the same safety measures as the others? Maybe if I was 80 and obese, but I stand no chance of dying as it stands now.
 
Back