Culture Where Are The Female Characters in the Mario Movie?

The main cast for next year’s Mario movie has been announced and it’s not great news for gender diversity so far. Of the nine named characters revealed at Nintendo Direct, only one of them was female. What happened to Daisy? Or Rosalina? Despite a range of options on the table, it doesn’t look like Nintendo’s interested in biting.

keengamer (Archive) - September 27, 2021
by, Frances Addison

1632795187725.png


Last week saw the latest Nintendo Direct, a livestream hosted by the Japanese games company to announce and promote their current projects. It mostly consisted of the content one might expect: some more information about the plot of the upcoming Metroid Dread, a showcase of Undertale-sequel Deltarune, and a list of titles coming to the Nintendo Switch in the next year or so. One announcement that surprised fans, however, was that of the main cast for an animated Mario movie slated to release at the end of next year.

Unsurprisingly, the announcement sparked a lot of conversation online. Some people were quick to draw attention to the widely mocked and criticised 1993 Super Mario Bros movie. Others took issue with the revelation that Mario himself would be voiced by Chris Pratt, rather than professional voice actor and supplier of Its-a-me-Mario’s for several decades, Charles Martinet. More positively, many people were very excited to hear that Jack Black has been cast as series villain Bowser.

Now, discussing the merits and failings of a film that is still over a year from release is clearly futile. Its success can’t be determined until people have actually had a chance to see it, and that’s a long way off yet. All anyone can know right now is which primary characters we’re going to be seeing.

Using this framework, however, there’s at least one concern: where are all the women?

Women in the Mario Universe​

The Super Mario games have always been dominated by male characters. Focusing on the main games in the series, a reasonable suggestion of the core cast would be thus: the protagonists Mario, Luigi, Yoshi, and Peach, antiheroes Waluigi and Wario, and villain Bowser. There are, of course, other characters who appear periodically but these seven are the most enduring. A six-to-one ratio of male-to-female isn’t exactly brilliant gender representation by anyone’s standards.

That’s not to say there aren’t female characters in the Super Mario universe. Besides Peach, there are two other princesses, Daisy and Rosalina, who have both made appearances in multiple games. Peach’s Mushroom Kingdom is been home to both Toad and his female counterpart Toadette. More recently Pauline, originally the damsel-in-distress from the 1981 game Donkey Kong, made a decisive move into the Mario milieu in Super Mario Odyssey as the mayor of New Donk City. Even the villains have a few female faces to choose from, such as Bowser’s daughter Wendy O. Koopa (although with Wendy’s six brothers, the Koopalings are still a male-orientated bunch).

1632795252199.png


Although they’re certainly in the minority, the Super Mario games are not without a diverse set of female characters. They rarely have much time in the spotlight, unfortunately; they’ve traditionally served as a goal rather than characters with their own agency – someone to be rescued instead of someone to be played as. Even modern mainstream games, including Super Mario Odyssey, have largely stuck to this damsel-in-distress narrative. Fortunately, however, some spin-off titles have put these women front and centre. Take Super Princess Peach, for example, which puts players in the titular character’s tiny pink shoes with a quest to rescue Mario for change.

It’s still far from an equal gender balance, but it’s impossible to deny the female characters have their own part to play in the Mario franchise.

The Cast List​

Let’s start by saying that the currently available cast list of nine confirmed characters (and an unspecified collection of ‘cameos’ by Charles Martinet) is highly unlikely to be the total cast list of the final movie. There’s sure to be a host of secondary characters filling up the world. Without any information to go off, we can’t speculate on who they will be. What is likely, however, is that the list makes up the majority, if not all, of the main characters.

Why, then, is only one of those nine a woman? As shown above, it’s not like there aren’t pre-existing female characters to choose from. Worse, two of those same nine, Donkey Kong and Cranky Kong, aren’t technically even Mario characters and yet they’ve somehow outranked a character like Daisy who has been a recurring character in the series since 1989. (While Donkey Kong and Mario technically featured together as far back as 1981, that series has been firmly categorised as Donkey Kong, rather than Super Mario. Trying to keep track of Nintendo’s internal canon is wild).

1632795301240.png


None of this is to say that the Mario movie should take away traditional male characters and replace them with female copies. Doing so would add nothing new to the narrative and would likely anger fans. More importantly, it would be utterly needless when there are plenty of long-standing female characters to use instead. There’s no one out here arguing that a gender-bent Mario would make a better movie, or that Mario’s character would be strengthened by suddenly having a sister instead of a brother. (Although given the incredibly popular Bowsette from a few years ago, maybe there is?)

What Nintendo could instead do is highlight some of the characters who have previously been relegated to the background. In doing so, they might just bring a little more gender balance to a series that has, historically, lacked it.

Why Does It Matter?​

You might have got this far wondering who on earth cares about the gender diversity of an animated film not out for another year. Well, clearly, I do, but it’s more than simple taste. Nintendo is one of the most well-known and successful video game companies of all time. Ever since their early arcade cabinets in the 1980s, the company has driven innovation across the industry. Almost anyone who considers themselves a gamer will have had at least a brush with a Mario title at one time or another. Importantly, their games also tend to skew more towards younger players. Nintendo, perhaps more than anyone else, is in a perfect position to help to guide the gaming community’s future.

1632795344013.png


By selecting almost exclusively male characters for a video game film, Nintendo is playing directly into a stale and exclusionary trend of gaming being a male pastime. This has been a long-standing concern for a lot of people in and around the industry. We’ve come a long way from titles like the sexist nightmare of Duke Nukem Forever, but it’s still easy to see the dominance of male protagonists and male-targeted marketing and development. All of this is despite recent studies proving that women make up almost half of the gaming community.

One animated movie from Nintendo isn’t going to change decades of habit and opinion; at least, it wouldn’t yet. That’s why it’s important to highlight the young age of the company’s target demographic. If a lot of young people see a film about their favourite video game, and they have the opportunity to see a diverse cast of both male and female characters, then it helps to build a foundation of accepting diversity they can carry through as they grow older. A lot of female gamers were thrilled when Metroid protagonist Samus Aran revealed herself to be a woman in 1986; young girls today deserve that same excitement.

Given Nintendo’s prominence in the industry, they could have given them better representation than 11% of a cast list.
 
I wanted to portray the mustachioed man the way he was always meant to be portrayed, as a proud woman of color.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kulee Baba
There's that creepy fixation the woke cultists have with "community" yet again.

Just because people have a trait in common, doesn't mean they're a "community".

This is like saying everyone who likes spaghetti are the "spaghetti community".
These fools forget that a community is something you actively participate in, not trait-oriented. I like to play games but that don't mean I stand with the queers who say they're in the gaming community.
 
1. Mario really doesn't have many female characters, in fact really doesn't have a ton of characters at all, which is why most party games they make are made up of random enemies.

2. The story they are telling likely doesn't fit having Daisy or the such in the movie or they are being saved for the follow-up.

3. Nintendo is likely not allowing the studio to make new characters, which is why a deep cut like Foreman Spike is in the movie. This is the case in Paper Mario, where they are not even allowed to modify Mario characters such as they did with Goombario and Bombettefrom the original Paper Mario
 
3. Nintendo is likely not allowing the studio to make new characters, which is why a deep cut like Foreman Spike is in the movie. This is the case in Paper Mario, where they are not even allowed to modify Mario characters such as they did with Goombario and Bombettefrom the original Paper Mario
*Reader Discretion Advised The Following Post Will Be Very Autistic Almost Moviebob/Dobson tier*

So it's no secret that the greatest game designer who will ever live Shigeru Miyamoto has effectively retired from the game development side of Nintendo. Nintendo being a Japanese Billion Dollar corporation is very secretive & it's unlikely we will know why Miyamoto wasn't credited on Zelda Breath of the Wild or Super Mario Odyssey. What we know for certain is that Star Fox Zero for the Wii U is one of the biggest critical & commercial failures in Nintendo's software history. Miyamoto served an integral role in that game's development, he championed the game's controversial design choice to use the Wii U Tablet as an aiming device which needlessly complicated the simplistic arcade action of Star Fox. It's also likely that Miyamoto insisted the game be a remake of Star Fox 64 (which already was a remake of Star Fox SNES) so autistic Nintendo fans like myself had little incentive to spend $60 and master new gimmicky controls just to play a retread. I can go on about the Star Fox Zero fiasco but long story short after it flopped Miyamoto decided it was time to let the next generation take over or he was forced to.

But Miyamoto cannot just be shown the door like Nintendo did to the late Gunpei Yokoi. Only hardcore gamers can recognize that name. Shigeru Miyamoto the is human face of the corporation as the creator of Mario & Zelda. So Miyamoto's new role is to watch directly over this Hollywood movie along with the Universal Studio's Nintendo Theme Park. And Shiggy's influence is evident as both of these are not going to break with Miyamoto's faithful if not somewhat bland vision of the Nintendo game worlds.

Did you guys know that Miyamoto banned Mario from giving the "V Sign?" I didn't notice that until an even more autistic Nintendo fan Youtuber made a whole video on that.


This whole incident amuses the shit out of me. Perhaps Miyamoto just only knows Japanese culture but the V Sign was used by many people including hippies, soldiers, Winston Churchill & Richard Nixon. And even if you excuse Miyamoto for being unaware of Western culture the fact is the dude directed the most "kiddie" Mario game "Yoshi's Island" which introduced Baby Mario. And don't get me started on Bowser Jr. The guy's vision for the game world is odd if not downright contradictory.

But anyway it's not Nintendo itself who mandates no OC characters. It's Miyamoto all the way. And hopefully this means Mario won't be doing Zoomer Floss dancing as I imagine Miyamoto would start screaming at the storyboard artists.

I hope for this movie they just make Mario a total fuck up. That is Mario at his funniest & truest to the character. For most players Mario getting hurt is the experience as the players are hit by hazards & fall into bottomless pits. I certainly don't expect this movie to be Pixar-quality but I can envision a Shrek 2 tier movie being made. Mario being the one and only hero of the Mushroom Kingdom is a total creative dead-end. Just make it a silly movie where two brothers go on a wacky adventure and learn the value of teamwork or some shit.

Also for the love of god retcon the stupid "Mario is their last name" trivia. Just make it a silly joke that they go by "Mario Bros" because the Toads can't pronounce anything longer than 3 syllables or some shit.
 
MSM not even gonna mention how they DK a cracker? Whitewashing reaching new lows smh
 
Also for the love of god retcon the stupid "Mario is their last name" trivia. Just make it a silly joke that they go by "Mario Bros" because the Toads can't pronounce anything longer than 3 syllables or some shit.
I would prefer they keep the gag and just blame it on Mario's mother.

"My mama was an Alcoholic Sicilian and English wasn't her first language"
 
Must identity politics be shoved into absolutely everything possible?

(I think we know what the woke cult thinks there. And it's tiresome.)
Imagine this: you’re a chef in a restaurant and you’re busy cooking everyone’s food. But just as you set your first dishes out, a group of activists storm the kitchen and demand you cook your food the way they want you to. So you have to get rid of all the ingredients people like because they’re either too spicy or someone with a food allergy might not be able to eat it. The end result is a plate filled with slop so bland even the activists who demanded those changes refuse to eat it. The end result is you lose your job, your employers reputation is in ruins, and the same people who fucked you are planning out which restaurant they’re going to ruin next.

That’s woke culture. It exists solely so that corporations can destroy everything you like and replace it with a bland paste made of bugs and chemically treated soy you squeeze out of a tube and onto your plate. You eat it or starve.
 
Back