- Joined
- Sep 10, 2021
Hope it's not a repost, but hilarious seeing a tranny BTFO by a based grandma!
Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
- Thread starter Real Mayun
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2021
Jordan thinks tranny jealousy is super bad. Proceeds to bitch about rich trannies living on easy mode.
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2021
Agreed, modern troons have as much in common with people suffering actual dysphoria as 90s women going through their college 'bisexual' phase had in common with the actual gay community.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2021
Her contention: if sex is a physical trait, then it MUST be changeable like changing coal into diamonds. It is known that all physical properties of an object can change over time, so sex must change under some precise circumstances. (I don‘t even know where her logic went wrong, I assume an aneurysm) Mx Idiot.. We know the properties of male bodies and female bodies. This does not mean that there is a fixed point at which A changes into B. My only guess is that she‘s trying to have hypothetical philosophical deep thoughts about biological objective reality.
Then she asks if changing a baby in the womb or DNA would be enough. Sure, just start up the time machine! Missy, since it is impossible to change every part of you down to your atom, you will never have a dick and always be female. She could also ask why we have not invented beaming yet. Yet she claims that since her absurd hypotheticals are rejected by TERFs that means sex is not physical, but supernatural and therefor a social construct. Which? What? How?
Sex is not an aggregate state of humans to cycle through. I cannot sublimate my womb or condensate into having a dick.
DumbDude42
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2019
"what would it take for them to believe that a person can change sex" is complete nonsense, it's like asking what it would take for them to believe that humans can grow wings and fly.
sex is determined at the moment of conception and impossible to change afterwards. if the egg is fertilized by a sperm carrying a Y chromosome the result is an XY (male) organism, if it is instead fertilized by a sperm carrying an X chromosome the result is an XX (female) organism. to change sex after that point would require ripping out half your sex chromosomes from the nuclei of your cells, and replacing them with the opposite sex chromosome, which is impossible.
Last edited:
behindyourightnow
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2021
Please tell me that someone has repeated her question back to her changing 'sex' to 'race.'
Jumping Jack Slash
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2021
lol tranny class war when?
behindyourightnow
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2021
Sorry for double post but I am so sick of all these hypothetical counterfactual situations troons are dragging up recently in an attempt to cope with their delusions and mournful reality. "What would you do if you woke up with the genitals of the opposite sex?" "What if we could change a baby's sex at the DNA level?" Who the hell cares, it has nothing to do with reality.
"Oh, you won't have sex with me, ma'am? Well consider this—what if I turned into Chris Hemsworth right now and also my dick could shoot whipped cream and I could manifest puppies and kittens with the power of my thoughts? Would you consider having sex with me then? Checkmate, m'lady!"
"Oh, you won't have sex with me, ma'am? Well consider this—what if I turned into Chris Hemsworth right now and also my dick could shoot whipped cream and I could manifest puppies and kittens with the power of my thoughts? Would you consider having sex with me then? Checkmate, m'lady!"
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2021
I suppose that in the most purely theoretical sense it is possible. If you successfully gene edited an embryo so that it had an X chromosome in place of a Y chromosome, then you would have changed that embryo's sex. But then you've got a ship of Theseus situation where you'd have to ask if that embryo would develop into the same person, because you've modified its genes - would you still be you if someone had modified which copies of Chromosome 12 you had?
From a practical perspective once an embryo's developed physically the changes are kinda baked in. You could remove the extra chromosome 20 from someone with down's syndrome through gene therapy in theory, but they'd still have downs because they've already developed in a set way. Likewise with sex, by around day 30 the mesonephric duct is starting to differentiate into what will eventually become the cock and balls, or atrophying into the skene's gland and epoophoron.
See how it says cloaca? That's how early in development this happens. Either way this is a bit like saying "in theory, since an animal's species is a physical reality, you can change a cat into a dog". In theory with enough gene editing you maybe could turn a cat embryo into a dog embryo, but it would probably spontaneously abort because - as always - biology isn't plug and play.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2018
TEXAS LEGISLATURE 2021
BY ALLYSON WALLER
SEPT. 28, 2021
2 HOURS AGO
Karen Krajcer and Linzy Foster are two friends familiar with the hallways of the Texas Capitol.
During this year’s regular legislative session and two subsequent special sessions that followed, the two mothers have shown up with a handful of other parents to advocate for their children who have been caught in the crosshairs of a slew of bills that target young transgender Texans.
Now, with the Legislature’s third special session underway, the two friends are enduring another round of visits and demonstrations as legislators again debate a top Republican legislative priority: restricting transgender youth from playing on sports teams that are consistent with their gender identity.
“It just keeps on happening, it’s ridiculous,” Krajcer, a mother to a 9-year-old, said about the amount of bills filed during sessions that have targeted LGBTQ Texans. “This is the fourth round this year. … Why are we still having to do this?”
So far, the Texas Senate has passed a bill limiting transgender participation in youth sports four separate times. The first three times, the bills stalled out and failed. Last week, Senate Bill 3, authored by Lubbock Republican state Sen. Charles Perry, was approved by a 19-12 Senate vote, with all but one Democrat voting no.
It has now moved to the House and on Monday was referred to the House Public Education Committee, where last time state Rep. Harold Dutton, D-Houston, blocked similar legislation from reaching the House floor. During an interview at The Texas Tribune Festival on Friday, House Speaker Dade Phelan said the House would have the votes to pass the legislation should it head to the House floor.
The bill would require student athletes at K-12 public schools to play on sports teams that correspond with the assigned sex listed on their birth certificate as it was issued at or near the time of their birth. The University Interscholastic League, which governs school athletics in Texas, already uses students’ birth certificates to confirm their gender, and also accepts modified birth certificates a student may have had changed to align with their gender identity. SB3 would end that acceptance.
Linzy Foster says she doesn't feel heard regarding her advocacy for transgender rights. Credit: Michael Gonzalez/The Texas Tribune
“I mean my health has been affected by this. I have lost sleep, I'm losing my hair, I'm having to take different medications,” said Foster, 42, who lives in Austin and is a mother to a 7-year-old transgender girl. “This is chronic stress that we're dealing with, because we get these little breathers in between sessions where we think, ‘OK, are we done? Are we good? At least maybe we can take a break, and then maybe we'll think about strategy for next session, because we know it's coming,’ but we don't even get a break yet.”
Both Foster and Krajcer asked the names of their children not be used for their children’s protection.
In August, Foster waited almost 20 hours at a Capitol hearing to plead with the House Public Education Committee not to “support legislation based on speculation.”
“What is real is the direct harm this bill is causing right now on trans youth and their families,” Foster told committee members.
Just last week, Foster and Krajcer joined a demonstration held by Equality Texas outside the Senate chamber, protesting a committee hearing where legislators voted to advance the transgender sports bill to the Senate floor. Foster and Krajcer, along with a handful of other demonstrators, stood on steps outside the chamber repeatedly chanting phrases like “enough is enough” and “protect trans kids” as state police officers stood off to the side monitoring their noise levels.
Although both their children are too young to join UIL sports teams, Foster and Krajcer have said they have shown interest in sports such as soccer and basketball. However, if SB3 passes, they said it's likely even the possibility of UIL competition won’t be an option.
“[My daughter] is eager, but I keep thinking about how horrible that's gonna be to tell her [one] day that sports might not be an option for her, just because of who she was born as, the fact that she's different,” Foster said.
Krajcer, a native Houstonian, said she’s had thoughts about moving if legislation that would target her transgender daughter were to become law in Texas. One of the darkest moments out of this series of sessions for her family was when legislators in the Senate passed a measure that would restrict gender-affirming care for children and classify providing such care as child abuse.
“My daughter said to me, ‘Are we going to have to move?’” Krajcer, 43, recalled.
“It just keeps on happening, it’s ridiculous,” Karen Krajcer, a mother to a 9-year-old, said about the amount of bills filed during sessions that have targeted LGBTQ Texans. Credit: Michael Gonzalez/The Texas Tribune
She answered that there were many people in the Capitol fighting to keep that from happening.
“And she went, ‘But if we move it’s going to be my fault.’ And that’s a lot for a child to have to go through,” Krajcer said.
The Trevor Project, a suicide prevention and crisis intervention organization for young LGBTQ people, said crisis contacts from LGBTQ Texans seeking support has increased more than 150% from Jan. 1 through Aug. 30, compared to that same time period last year. According to a research brief the organization released this month, a majority of LGBTQ young people, almost 70%, do not actively participate in sports, “with many citing fear of bullying and discrimination as a key factor for not participating.”
The organization said in a statement that while the amount of crisis contacts it has received this year from Texans can’t be attributed to one specific factor or piece of legislation, “transgender and nonbinary youth in Texas have directly stated that they are feeling stressed, using self-harm, and considering suicide due to anti-LGBTQ laws being debated in their state.”
Perry, as well as supporters of SB3, has argued that the legislation preserves women’s sports and the intent of Title IX, which requires schools who receive federal funds to provide equal opportunities for students on the basis of sex, including for activities such as sports.
“It’s about safety and equity in peer groups,” Perry said. “... It’s a bicameral process, and we’ll see where [the bill] goes in the House. I suspect it goes through.”
However, opponents see the bill’s language as divisive and dismissive of transgender children and their identities, alienating them when they may already endure bullying and mental health issues.
“It's meat,” Foster said of Perry’s arguments. “It's to get people [to the Capitol], it's to get people to testify, to drum up the fear that transgender women — which are women by the way — are going to take over women’s sports.”
Rebekah Bryant at her daughter’s school in Houston on Sept. 23, 2021. Credit: Annie Mulligan for The Texas Tribune
Rebekah Bryant, who lives in Houston, said she’s traveled to Austin at least six times since May this year, pleading with legislators to not pass bills targeting transgender youth like her daughter Sunny, an 8-year-old transgender girl who has enjoyed playing sports such as baseball and gymnastics.
The consecutive sessions have put a financial burden on her family, said Bryant, 37. Traveling to Austin often requires her to take off work and book a hotel because committee meetings can often last the whole day and well into the night. Bryant said before this year, Sunny was not really aware there were people in the world who did not accept her, and Bryant and her husband never really had to explain publicly that Sunny is transgender.
“We had to show her the dark side of what her future is, and I think that’s been really hard for my husband and me,” Bryant said. “We know that she has potential for depression, and we know there's all these mental health issues that come along with society not accepting her. … She didn't know that she was ever going to have any resistance in life and now she knows, and I think it’s taken a toll on her and her mental health.”
Bryant has testified before legislative committees at least twice, with Sunny testifying by herself twice.
“Let me play, let me skin my knees diving into home [plate], cheer for my teammates when they score and feel the freedom of running as fast as I can,” Sunny said before the House Public Education committee last month.
While at committee hearings, Sunny usually spends time playing with another kid or on her iPad, said Bryant, who prefers to make sure Sunny isn’t exposed to some of the factually incorrect statements that are made during public testimony.
Bryant said she hopes by the time Sunny becomes of age to participate in UIL sports that SB3 or similar bills won’t have become law. If they do, Sunny will likely have to stay in private school.
“I know that we're going to find a [public] school that's going to support us, I just don't know if they'll legally be able to,” Bryant said.
Krajcer said right now she and other parents have been shifting their focus to the House and how the bill will fare in committee.
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said in a recent statement that he will continue pushing for the bill’s full passage, noting that the Senate has passed similar legislation four times that has languished in the House.
“We cannot allow our women to be pushed out of athletic scholarships and out of sporting excellence,” Patrick said. “This is the fourth time we have passed this bill out of the Senate this year, and we will continue passing this bill until it finally becomes law in Texas.”
As much as she wishes she didn’t have to see such a bill come up again, Bryant said she will stay engaged, anticipating that one day she and Sunny won’t have to visit the Capitol under such intense circumstances.
“I’m hoping we can turn this into something positive, because her first visit to the Capitol should have been a school field trip, not defending her humanity,” Bryant said.
Disclosure: Equality Texas has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
“It just keeps on happening”: Texas parents fight legislation targeting their trans children for the fourth time this year
The Texas Senate has passed a bill restricting transgender youth from playing on sports teams consistent with their gender identity four separate times in 2021.BY ALLYSON WALLER
SEPT. 28, 2021
2 HOURS AGO
Karen Krajcer and Linzy Foster are two friends familiar with the hallways of the Texas Capitol.
During this year’s regular legislative session and two subsequent special sessions that followed, the two mothers have shown up with a handful of other parents to advocate for their children who have been caught in the crosshairs of a slew of bills that target young transgender Texans.
Now, with the Legislature’s third special session underway, the two friends are enduring another round of visits and demonstrations as legislators again debate a top Republican legislative priority: restricting transgender youth from playing on sports teams that are consistent with their gender identity.
“It just keeps on happening, it’s ridiculous,” Krajcer, a mother to a 9-year-old, said about the amount of bills filed during sessions that have targeted LGBTQ Texans. “This is the fourth round this year. … Why are we still having to do this?”
So far, the Texas Senate has passed a bill limiting transgender participation in youth sports four separate times. The first three times, the bills stalled out and failed. Last week, Senate Bill 3, authored by Lubbock Republican state Sen. Charles Perry, was approved by a 19-12 Senate vote, with all but one Democrat voting no.
It has now moved to the House and on Monday was referred to the House Public Education Committee, where last time state Rep. Harold Dutton, D-Houston, blocked similar legislation from reaching the House floor. During an interview at The Texas Tribune Festival on Friday, House Speaker Dade Phelan said the House would have the votes to pass the legislation should it head to the House floor.
The bill would require student athletes at K-12 public schools to play on sports teams that correspond with the assigned sex listed on their birth certificate as it was issued at or near the time of their birth. The University Interscholastic League, which governs school athletics in Texas, already uses students’ birth certificates to confirm their gender, and also accepts modified birth certificates a student may have had changed to align with their gender identity. SB3 would end that acceptance.
Although the sports bill and other bills targeting transgender youth, such as those that would limit gender-affirming care, have not become law in Texas, LGBTQ advocates and the transgender community have expressed that the simple possibility has already exacted a mental toll on transgender youth. And with a third special session now underway, parents of transgender children have only seen the frustration — and exhaustion — grow among their families.
Linzy Foster says she doesn't feel heard regarding her advocacy for transgender rights. Credit: Michael Gonzalez/The Texas Tribune
“I mean my health has been affected by this. I have lost sleep, I'm losing my hair, I'm having to take different medications,” said Foster, 42, who lives in Austin and is a mother to a 7-year-old transgender girl. “This is chronic stress that we're dealing with, because we get these little breathers in between sessions where we think, ‘OK, are we done? Are we good? At least maybe we can take a break, and then maybe we'll think about strategy for next session, because we know it's coming,’ but we don't even get a break yet.”
Both Foster and Krajcer asked the names of their children not be used for their children’s protection.
In August, Foster waited almost 20 hours at a Capitol hearing to plead with the House Public Education Committee not to “support legislation based on speculation.”
“What is real is the direct harm this bill is causing right now on trans youth and their families,” Foster told committee members.
Just last week, Foster and Krajcer joined a demonstration held by Equality Texas outside the Senate chamber, protesting a committee hearing where legislators voted to advance the transgender sports bill to the Senate floor. Foster and Krajcer, along with a handful of other demonstrators, stood on steps outside the chamber repeatedly chanting phrases like “enough is enough” and “protect trans kids” as state police officers stood off to the side monitoring their noise levels.
Although both their children are too young to join UIL sports teams, Foster and Krajcer have said they have shown interest in sports such as soccer and basketball. However, if SB3 passes, they said it's likely even the possibility of UIL competition won’t be an option.
“[My daughter] is eager, but I keep thinking about how horrible that's gonna be to tell her [one] day that sports might not be an option for her, just because of who she was born as, the fact that she's different,” Foster said.
Krajcer, a native Houstonian, said she’s had thoughts about moving if legislation that would target her transgender daughter were to become law in Texas. One of the darkest moments out of this series of sessions for her family was when legislators in the Senate passed a measure that would restrict gender-affirming care for children and classify providing such care as child abuse.
“My daughter said to me, ‘Are we going to have to move?’” Krajcer, 43, recalled.
“It just keeps on happening, it’s ridiculous,” Karen Krajcer, a mother to a 9-year-old, said about the amount of bills filed during sessions that have targeted LGBTQ Texans. Credit: Michael Gonzalez/The Texas Tribune
She answered that there were many people in the Capitol fighting to keep that from happening.
“And she went, ‘But if we move it’s going to be my fault.’ And that’s a lot for a child to have to go through,” Krajcer said.
The Trevor Project, a suicide prevention and crisis intervention organization for young LGBTQ people, said crisis contacts from LGBTQ Texans seeking support has increased more than 150% from Jan. 1 through Aug. 30, compared to that same time period last year. According to a research brief the organization released this month, a majority of LGBTQ young people, almost 70%, do not actively participate in sports, “with many citing fear of bullying and discrimination as a key factor for not participating.”
The organization said in a statement that while the amount of crisis contacts it has received this year from Texans can’t be attributed to one specific factor or piece of legislation, “transgender and nonbinary youth in Texas have directly stated that they are feeling stressed, using self-harm, and considering suicide due to anti-LGBTQ laws being debated in their state.”
Perry, as well as supporters of SB3, has argued that the legislation preserves women’s sports and the intent of Title IX, which requires schools who receive federal funds to provide equal opportunities for students on the basis of sex, including for activities such as sports.
“It’s about safety and equity in peer groups,” Perry said. “... It’s a bicameral process, and we’ll see where [the bill] goes in the House. I suspect it goes through.”
However, opponents see the bill’s language as divisive and dismissive of transgender children and their identities, alienating them when they may already endure bullying and mental health issues.
“It's meat,” Foster said of Perry’s arguments. “It's to get people [to the Capitol], it's to get people to testify, to drum up the fear that transgender women — which are women by the way — are going to take over women’s sports.”
Rebekah Bryant at her daughter’s school in Houston on Sept. 23, 2021. Credit: Annie Mulligan for The Texas Tribune
Rebekah Bryant, who lives in Houston, said she’s traveled to Austin at least six times since May this year, pleading with legislators to not pass bills targeting transgender youth like her daughter Sunny, an 8-year-old transgender girl who has enjoyed playing sports such as baseball and gymnastics.
The consecutive sessions have put a financial burden on her family, said Bryant, 37. Traveling to Austin often requires her to take off work and book a hotel because committee meetings can often last the whole day and well into the night. Bryant said before this year, Sunny was not really aware there were people in the world who did not accept her, and Bryant and her husband never really had to explain publicly that Sunny is transgender.
“We had to show her the dark side of what her future is, and I think that’s been really hard for my husband and me,” Bryant said. “We know that she has potential for depression, and we know there's all these mental health issues that come along with society not accepting her. … She didn't know that she was ever going to have any resistance in life and now she knows, and I think it’s taken a toll on her and her mental health.”
Bryant has testified before legislative committees at least twice, with Sunny testifying by herself twice.
“Let me play, let me skin my knees diving into home [plate], cheer for my teammates when they score and feel the freedom of running as fast as I can,” Sunny said before the House Public Education committee last month.
While at committee hearings, Sunny usually spends time playing with another kid or on her iPad, said Bryant, who prefers to make sure Sunny isn’t exposed to some of the factually incorrect statements that are made during public testimony.
Bryant said she hopes by the time Sunny becomes of age to participate in UIL sports that SB3 or similar bills won’t have become law. If they do, Sunny will likely have to stay in private school.
“I know that we're going to find a [public] school that's going to support us, I just don't know if they'll legally be able to,” Bryant said.
Krajcer said right now she and other parents have been shifting their focus to the House and how the bill will fare in committee.
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said in a recent statement that he will continue pushing for the bill’s full passage, noting that the Senate has passed similar legislation four times that has languished in the House.
“We cannot allow our women to be pushed out of athletic scholarships and out of sporting excellence,” Patrick said. “This is the fourth time we have passed this bill out of the Senate this year, and we will continue passing this bill until it finally becomes law in Texas.”
As much as she wishes she didn’t have to see such a bill come up again, Bryant said she will stay engaged, anticipating that one day she and Sunny won’t have to visit the Capitol under such intense circumstances.
“I’m hoping we can turn this into something positive, because her first visit to the Capitol should have been a school field trip, not defending her humanity,” Bryant said.
Disclosure: Equality Texas has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
Funny how, after all that faulty reasoning, tranny "intellectual" arguments always boil down to swear words at the end.
This one can't even construct a good straw man. Of course "gender criticals" can say what it would take for a person to change sex. That knowledge is how they can tell it's impossible to change sex.
The saddest part of that Twitter bio:
No wonder they 41%.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2021
> 7 year old transexual child
> 9 year old transexual child
Gosh diddly darnit Texas, how did you let this happen!?
> 9 year old transexual child
Gosh diddly darnit Texas, how did you let this happen!?
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2020
One of them lives in Austin and the other one moved to the suburbs. Austin is the only part of Texas that sticks out like a sore thumb with its liberalism. These moms are acting as if the state is going to take their kids and stick them in some sort of sports death camp.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
- Joined
- May 8, 2021
They are in pain, there's is this fundamental truth at the chore that burns them like hot coal: they are not their desired sex. They can never totally bridge that gap. They can bring themselves a bit closer but never all the way.
All of those convolution are just them trying to make sense of things while not touching the burning no-no-place where the concept of sex is.
They should just say "though i understand that i am female/male, i prefer living as another gender from my own it brings me peace, it's soothing to me to be recognized as male/female by most people. As a result of living like that for some time, my daily experience is very different and it doesn't really make sense to deadname me or refer to my "birthgender" when not medically relevant" and leave it at that.
I would agree with that.
They always try to string words and concept together like they are making scientific and sociological breakthrough and at the end it makes as much sense as all those crazy dudes who thought they were Napoleon. They are saying "you never saw me and Napoleon in the same room together so you can't prove i am not Napoleon"
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2021
Bodies have no gender. The skeleton is only wearing a flesh suit. Owned to the atoms.
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2020
The cover is suggesting that someone's sex is only skin deep and that all of us have an identical skeleton inside us. Of course, this is all nonsense because people can readily distinguish female skeletons from male ones based on a number of features, including the shape of the pelvis.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
I don't know how many atoms need to be changed to turn a man into a woman; I just know that merely uttering "I am a woman" won't cut it.
Of course trannies will claim it is worthwhile to screen "neovaginas" for HPV even if only one life is saved. Then we are talking about public health and resource allocation. The two big questions are 1) How many troons do we need to screen (and at what cost) to catch one case of cancer? 2) Does it matter if we catch the cancer early, when it is invisible and asymptomatic, rather than, say, three years later when it grows into an ulcer and starts to bleed? For cervical cancer among genuine women, we are certain that 1) cervical smear lowers the total cost of health care and 2) It absolutely matters to catch the cancer early: the treatments are less drastic and cheaper, and the woman's life is more likely to be saved. With stink ditches we simply don't have the answers, but my hunch is that they don't favor screening.
Recently it becomes increasingly certain that HPV is also associated with colorectal cancers. When will the first case of cancer in the colonic stinkditch come up? It sure is a fun time to be a pathologist!
If you disagree, you are an anti-intellectual.
Most stinkditches are lined with penile skin, keratinized squamous epithelium which is quite resistant to HPV infection. Even the glans (which gets cut in size to become the "clit") is squamous epithelium that is completely different from the vaginal and cervical mucosa. The risk of cancer should be low.
Of course trannies will claim it is worthwhile to screen "neovaginas" for HPV even if only one life is saved. Then we are talking about public health and resource allocation. The two big questions are 1) How many troons do we need to screen (and at what cost) to catch one case of cancer? 2) Does it matter if we catch the cancer early, when it is invisible and asymptomatic, rather than, say, three years later when it grows into an ulcer and starts to bleed? For cervical cancer among genuine women, we are certain that 1) cervical smear lowers the total cost of health care and 2) It absolutely matters to catch the cancer early: the treatments are less drastic and cheaper, and the woman's life is more likely to be saved. With stink ditches we simply don't have the answers, but my hunch is that they don't favor screening.
Recently it becomes increasingly certain that HPV is also associated with colorectal cancers. When will the first case of cancer in the colonic stinkditch come up? It sure is a fun time to be a pathologist!
It's Judith Fucking Butler so what else would you expect? Indeed according to Butler gender isn't even skin deep. Gender is exactly what you do: change your "iterated pattern of gestures" (something like that) and you change your gender!
If you disagree, you are an anti-intellectual.
Last edited:
DoTheDrew
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2020
Show Moody some love peeps. Fat Tony is suing her AGAIN.
I see this in my native language as well and I usually just take it as a sign that someone's internalized American "woke" / "queer" culture and ideology to such an extent that they're unable to express their thoughts in their own language because they knew if they did, it would sound fucking stupid.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2021
Nope. No GCs were in the replies yet, not even hidden ones. But the madness continues.
Pulverizing someone down to the atom: reasonable hypothetical. Space aliens: god, you crazy?
In this case Butler didn‘t design the sticker, that was Ælias, the enby whatever, who slapped it on. But Judy would certainly think that bullshit.