Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[Sparkling Yuzu]

They're so self centred, they refuse to see how offensive calling trans surgeries lifesaving surgeries is. Lifesaving is getting cancer out, not chopping off cocks and titties for muh feels.


This twitter troon really thinks we'll be able to change human sex with genetic therapies in 10-15 yrs. Most people see that happening in the more distant future like 100-150 yrs. There's a ton of what should be "simple" monogenic diseases we can't cure yet so in all likelihood, I think those would be cured with genetic therapy first. There would be no medical reason to change someone's sex chromosomes except for rare DSDs (intersex conditions).
If medicine was that advanced we could probably put blown up and extremely mangled human bodies back together by growing them all new parts and paralysis could be cured. It sounds kinda dope and I love some good speculative fiction but good gods troons. IDK if these beliefs are just severe cope because if they're not that's getting into psychotic delusion territory. Similar to the ones who say womb transplants for transwomen will be here in 10-15 yrs.

 

[decaydent]

A tranny in Birmingham got stabbed by a dude he met online. The name of the suspect has already been released. Curiously, few tranny tweets mention Mr Nazir Mohammed, even though all the articles they quote name him. Vice at least puts „met online“ in the headline and puts the focus on the attack not being random.

Spoiler

The activists do make time for the important things though: telling Rosie Duffield that now is NOT the time to even exist for her and probably accusing her of fueling the transphobia as well somewhere.

Spoiler

How can we blame the challenge to our worldview we don‘t like for all invented evils? Reach harder, TRA.

 

[AssignedEva]

don't even try to make sense of it, the whole "particle accelerators can turn lead to gold, therefor trans women are women!" is pure dumbfuckery
it reminds me of a story about some dude somewhere in africa claiming to have scientifically proven that homosexuality is wrong, and his 'proof' was pointing out that opposite charge magnetic poles attract each other while same charge poles repel each other, which means that homosex doesn't work lol

i don't even know the proper name for this kind of nonsense 'argument' but basically my point is that these people aren't making coherent arguments at all, they're trying to draw conclusions from things that have absolutely no relation to the actual subject matter

The thing is, if you buy their CRISPR arguments (not how it works, you can use CRISPR to cut out one gene or one section of gene and then use a virus to insert something else, not swap an entire chromosome) then you still have a Ship of Theseus situation. If you genetically edit someone into someone else, have you changed their sex or just induced a transgenic mosaic in their body? What if you took a cell sample, edited the chromosomes, grew a replacement body and did a brain transplant - have you changed their sex, or just made Never Let Me Go in real life?

And going back to the embryo thing - in theory you could swap a Y for an X in the embryo. But you could also get a sperm cell, swap a Y for an X and then fertilise the egg, and functionally that would be the same. Is that changing sex, if it's just modifying a sperm cell? What if you took an X chromosome from a woman that wasn't the mother?

Don't even engage them on that kind of level, it's all part of their tactics. Arguing these far off hypotheticals allows them to ignore the elephant in the room which is that HRT and surgery will not turn a man into a woman. If we had procedures that could make a man so similar to a woman that a reasonably thorough examination couldn't tell the difference then maybe there'd be a point to the debate, but until we reach that point there's no point. Why argue about the precise details when a good look is enough to out 95% of TiMs to an experienced eye (even without stripping them) and a short conversation will expose the other 5% and for the foreseeable future they'll all be clockable once they get their clothes off? Granted, this is a little more complex with TiFs because I'd say that these numbers are a little batter for them, but fortunately TiMs don't give a shit about TiFs.

Also, another hypothetical they love is, "what if tomorrow you woke up in a woman's/man's body and no one believed that you were really a man/woman? Wouldn't that be traumatizing?" and the problem there is that if I had a bizarre belief that contradicted all objective reality then I'd probably schedule some therapy. Believing that your body is somehow wrong is a common schizophrenic belief.

Oh yeah, it's fun to poke holes in their theories on here, but I wouldn't bother actually having this conversation with someone suggesting these things. There'd be no point, because most of them know what they're saying is bunk. It's like the NPC meme, they're looking for arguments to throw out to stymie "the enemy" rather than actually having a reasoned conversation and thinking through what they're saying.

Anybody who says he understands 50% of Judith Butler is a liar, because Butler is a grifter who writes random fucking words.

View attachment 2577433

I hate the whole STEM vs Humanities thing, but there's a very noticeable difference in how those academics approach things. STEM tends to try and explain research proposals in very direct ways because the university admin team want to know what they're doing, so saying "we're studying a tuberculosis protein to see how it makes TB more infectious" is going to gain more traction than "we're studying the mycobacterium nonclassical transpeptidase LdtMt2 to eludicate the impact of 3-3 transpeptide".

Meanwhile humanities has the opposite problem, and needs to deal with the admins maybe not taking them seriously. Which is why you get "I'm going to write about how mourning my pet dog is feminist actually" rephrased as a comparative study of Judith Butler's and Giorgio Agamben's bioethics from an anti-anthrocentric perspective. The more obscure you can make it, the better.

Anyway, Judith Butler's sentence kinda boils down to:

"Structuralists argue that capitalism is a hierarchical system from which power is derived from the top and that this makes all institutions work the same way and look very similar. We now think power has a lot more to do with many individual interactions throughout society rather than some central authority".

But of course she couldn't just say that.

 

[ScooterL]

A tranny in Birmingham got stabbed by a dude he met online. The name of the suspect has already been released. Curiously, few tranny tweets mention Mr Nazir Mohammed, even though all the articles they quote name him. Vice at least puts „met online“ in the headline and puts the focus on the attack not being random.

Spoiler

View attachment 2578309

The activists do make time for the important things though: telling Rosie Duffield that now is NOT the time to even exist for her and probably accusing her of fueling the transphobia as well somewhere.

Spoiler

View attachment 2578313View attachment 2578329View attachment 2578345
How can we blame the challenge to our worldview we don‘t like for all invented evils? Reach harder, TRA.

They also won't mention the fact that there hasn't been a single murder of a tranny in the UK this year.

Terf Island probably has more violent tranny criminals than victims.

 

[AssignedEva]

A tranny in Birmingham got stabbed by a dude he met online. The name of the suspect has already been released. Curiously, few tranny tweets mention Mr Nazir Mohammed, even though all the articles they quote name him. Vice at least puts „met online“ in the headline and puts the focus on the attack not being random.

Spoiler

View attachment 2578309

The activists do make time for the important things though: telling Rosie Duffield that now is NOT the time to even exist for her and probably accusing her of fueling the transphobia as well somewhere.

Spoiler

View attachment 2578313View attachment 2578329View attachment 2578345
How can we blame the challenge to our worldview we don‘t like for all invented evils? Reach harder, TRA.

Birmingham Live went with the most straightforward headline - Transgender escort stabbed by schizophrenic after arranging to meet in city centre flat. Apparently they first "met" in November and the flat was her workplace rather than her home. This is a schizo repeat John going nuts over a hooker, and it probably has very little to do with being transgender.

 

[celebrityskin]

I mean, when you already have like 6 completely made-up identities what's one more?

I noticed it really pick up during the last Israeli-Palestinian war earlier this year. I suspect it was just so they could collect an easy 15-20k likes by making posts like "in case someone needs to hear this, antizionism =|=antisemitism" and "y'all, it is honestly disgusting how many Jewish people on my tl are just straight up doing the work of white supremacy and imperialism." I would be surprised if any of them have any actual connection to Judaism outside of social media.

Yeah lol. I'm not a yahoodi myself but I do live in Israel and am certain no major denomination would consider those people to be Jewish.

 

[Jumping Jack Slash]

My new gender is Kafkaesque.

Tranz Kafka, you could say.

 

[Ona Quest]

A tranny in Birmingham got stabbed by a dude he met online. The name of the suspect has already been released. Curiously, few tranny tweets mention Mr Nazir Mohammed, even though all the articles they quote name him. Vice at least puts „met online“ in the headline and puts the focus on the attack not being random.

Spoiler

View attachment 2578309

The activists do make time for the important things though: telling Rosie Duffield that now is NOT the time to even exist for her and probably accusing her of fueling the transphobia as well somewhere.

Spoiler

View attachment 2578313View attachment 2578329View attachment 2578345
How can we blame the challenge to our worldview we don‘t like for all invented evils? Reach harder, TRA.

So, a dude basically catfishes some other dude and then gets stabbed, but somehow this is a woman's fault?

 

[decaydent]

So, a dude basically catfishes some other dude and then gets stabbed, but somehow this is a woman's fault?

Obviously, Nazir was well-versed in RadFem literature and followed the Duffield debate on that very day. Must be transphobia.

 

[Seventy6]

A tranny in Birmingham got stabbed by a dude he met online. The name of the suspect has already been released. Curiously, few tranny tweets mention Mr Nazir Mohammed, even though all the articles they quote name him. Vice at least puts „met online“ in the headline and puts the focus on the attack not being random.

Spoiler

View attachment 2578309

The activists do make time for the important things though: telling Rosie Duffield that now is NOT the time to even exist for her and probably accusing her of fueling the transphobia as well somewhere.

Spoiler

View attachment 2578313View attachment 2578329View attachment 2578345
How can we blame the challenge to our worldview we don‘t like for all invented evils? Reach harder, TRA.

All part of the plan:


TRAs hop on any transgedy asap then will use obfuscation to create a narrative that pushes their agenda, ignoring the facts, in hopes that their narrative is the first ones to reach the public and other media sites - shaping people’s first impression of the situation.

Unfortunately, it works. We saw this with the WiSpa incident where the main narrative was to claim the video was a hoax, which was then published in other news sites. Where did this “reliable” claim come from? A Twitter user lol

 

[The Magnificence]

A tranny in Birmingham got stabbed by a dude he met online. The name of the suspect has already been released. Curiously, few tranny tweets mention Mr Nazir Mohammed, even though all the articles they quote name him. Vice at least puts „met online“ in the headline and puts the focus on the attack not being random.

Spoiler

View attachment 2578309

The activists do make time for the important things though: telling Rosie Duffield that now is NOT the time to even exist for her and probably accusing her of fueling the transphobia as well somewhere.

Spoiler

View attachment 2578313View attachment 2578329View attachment 2578345
How can we blame the challenge to our worldview we don‘t like for all invented evils? Reach harder, TRA.

This is somehow also JK Rowling's fault, I just know it...!

 

[DumbDude42]

The thing is, if you buy their CRISPR arguments (not how it works, you can use CRISPR to cut out one gene or one section of gene and then use a virus to insert something else, not swap an entire chromosome) then you still have a Ship of Theseus situation. If you genetically edit someone into someone else, have you changed their sex or just induced a transgenic mosaic in their body? What if you took a cell sample, edited the chromosomes, grew a replacement body and did a brain transplant - have you changed their sex, or just made Never Let Me Go in real life?

And going back to the embryo thing - in theory you could swap a Y for an X in the embryo. But you could also get a sperm cell, swap a Y for an X and then fertilise the egg, and functionally that would be the same. Is that changing sex, if it's just modifying a sperm cell? What if you took an X chromosome from a woman that wasn't the mother?

if you take an embryo and replace its y chromosome with an x chromosome in every single cell then yeah you would have changed its sex from male to female

if you did the same to a fetus in later development stages, or to a live human after birth, you'd create a new kind of artificial intersex condition, where there's a complete mismatch between genetic sex and physical sex. nobody can really tell how such an organism would develop or grow up, because nothing like this has ever existed on the planet before.

 

[decaydent]

This is somehow also JK Rowling's fault, I just know it...!

Harry Potter and the Escort‘s Equipment
Harry Potter and the City-center Flat of Secrets
Harry Potter and the Stabby-Stab-Stabber of Birmingham
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Ladydickjuice
Harry Potter and the Order of the TERF
Harry Potter and the Half-baked Manslaughter
Harry Potter and the Non-lethal Genocide

and: Harry Potter and the Cursed Dick
(okay, I‘ll stop)

 

[Neko GF]

A tranny in Birmingham got stabbed by a dude he met online. The name of the suspect has already been released. Curiously, few tranny tweets mention Mr Nazir Mohammed, even though all the articles they quote name him.

Of course they wouldn't name him. That's a Muslim name, meaning that they can't use it as a way to go after le evil TERFs.

 

[RandallBoggs]

Tiktoker yandere.freak is charged with manslaughter. Evil misgendering ensues. Archived article Allegedly played around with a gun he did not know was loaded and killed someone.

Spoiler

View attachment 2577700View attachment 2577701

How fragile and delicate. Off to the ladies slammer with they/them!

ETA: I stand corrected by @ash9990 this is indeed a female, but they/them nonbinary. The pronoun stuff remains dumb, but she should indeed go to women‘s prison (although I am now wondering if that might be triggering and enbyphobic)

HOLY FUCKING SHIT THIS USED TO BE A PERSONAL COW OF MINE LIKE 4 YEARS AGO

ETA

Yeah lol. I'm not a yahoodi myself but I do live in Israel and am certain no major denomination would consider those people to be Jewish.

View attachment 2578388

You're correct. Conversion is a long ass process that also requires outside approval from religious officials. Before you can even officially be declared a Jew you need to study everything Judaism for a minimum of around 1 year I think, and even after that if the Rabbi overseeing your progress doesn't think you're ready, it will take even longer. You can't just claim to be a self taught convert, it literally goes against Jewish law.
These people don't seem to understand there's a very distinct difference between someone who's ethnically Jewish and a convert. If you have 0 ties to Judaism and want to convert, it's to practice the Jewish religion, it doesn't magically turn you into an ethnic minority. And something tells me none of them would actually forego their precious internet and vidya games, put on a headscarf and go to the Synagogue every day lol.

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

Tiktoker yandere.freak is charged with manslaughter. Evil misgendering ensues. Archived article Allegedly played around with a gun he did not know was loaded and killed someone.

Spoiler

View attachment 2577700View attachment 2577701

How fragile and delicate. Off to the ladies slammer with they/them!

ETA: I stand corrected by @ash9990 this is indeed a female, but they/them nonbinary. The pronoun stuff remains dumb, but she should indeed go to women‘s prison (although I am now wondering if that might be triggering and enbyphobic)

Poor girl. Oh well.

 

[Rotter]

Link/Archive

 

[Inebriated Raccoon]

If you're attracted to men you're not a lesbian, it's that simple

It should be that simple. The funny thing is, troons will agree that lesbians aren’t attracted to men. The crux of this issue is that we are playing a stupid ass game of semantics with these troons. When we say “men”, we mean biological males, when troons say “men”, they mean anyone who identifies as a man (includes bio males and females).

Since when was it so difficult to just be bisexual? Or is that not woke and exotic enough now, do we have to be pansexual to include the nonbinary demigender boyflux

I shit you not, but this is an ongoing debate. Depending on the group of troons or genderspecials that you ask, they will label either bisexuality or pansexuality as transphobic.

Bisexuality is transphobic because “Bi”, which means two, “reinforces that sex is binary”. So, pansexuality is the moral sexuality in that case.

However, pansexuality is “woke transphobia” because it implies that trans men and women aren’t men and women, respectively. Essentially, pansexuality is often used to signal that you are willing to date/fuck troons. But to some troons, the creation of a new sexuality to be inclusive to troons is implied transphobia because it suggests that trans men and women are inherently different from their “cis” counterparts (essentially, they are separate classifications from their imagined gender; yes, this is dumb as fuck). So, in this case, bisexuality is the moral sexuality.

Here’s a person whose tweets perfectly summarizes the dumbassery of this debate.

Of course, there are some who will say that both are valid. This person makes bisexuality “un-transphobic” by defining it as attraction to multiple genders (so no more binary), which makes bisexuality a synonym for pansexuality. Also, this tweet is recent so this debate is still going on.

The bisexuality vs. pansexuality debate is peak troon insanity. They’ll never be satisfied because they’ll always find direct or implied “transphobia” in every concept or action. For them, exclusion = transphobia, and at any moment, troons can change the rules of the game. So something that is “woke” today can be “tranphobic” the next day.

Even aside from sexuality, why would you want to date any of these people? What kind of relationship would that be?

A miserable one where you must constant reaffirm your partner’s delusions and assist with their bloody dilation sessions.

 

[KiwiFarmerSimulator2021]

It should be that simple. The funny thing is, troons will agree that lesbians aren’t attracted to men. The crux of this issue is that we are playing a stupid ass game of semantics with these troons. When we say “men”, we mean biological males, when troons say “men”, they mean anyone who identifies as a man (includes bio males and females).



I shit you not, but this is an ongoing debate. Depending on the group of troons or genderspecials that you ask, they will label either bisexuality or pansexuality as transphobic.

Bisexuality is transphobic because “Bi”, which means two, “reinforces that sex is binary”. So, pansexuality is the moral sexuality in that case.

However, pansexuality is “woke transphobia” because it implies that trans men and women aren’t men and women, respectively. Essentially, pansexuality is often used to signal that you are willing to date/fuck troons. But to some troons, the creation of a new sexuality to be inclusive to troons is implied transphobia because it suggests that trans men and women are inherently different from their “cis” counterparts (essentially, they are separate classifications from their imagined gender; yes, this is dumb as fuck). So, in this case, bisexuality is the moral sexuality.

Here’s a person whose tweets perfectly summarizes the dumbassery of this debate.

View attachment 2578578
View attachment 2578579

Of course, there are some who will say that both are valid. This person makes bisexuality “un-transphobic” by defining it as attraction to multiple genders (so no more binary), which makes bisexuality a synonym for pansexuality. Also, this tweet is recent so this debate is still going on.View attachment 2578520
The bisexuality vs. pansexuality debate is peak troon insanity. They’ll never be satisfied because they’ll always find direct or implied “transphobia” in every concept or action. For them, exclusion = transphobia, and at any moment, troons can change the rules of the game. So something that is “woke” today can be “tranphobic” the next day.


A miserable one where you must constant reaffirm your partner’s delusions and assist with their bloody dilation sessions.

Just when you think theyve said every combination of words possible they go ahead and combine more words.

 

[OttoWest]

Some Labour councillor claimed she suffered “transphobia” when attempting to use the ladies’ loo at the recent party conference.

Here’s the money shots from her Instagram: