US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?

 

[Gehenna]

Speaking of pissing me off. A mystery was solved recently and I -still- refuse to not be pissed about it.

Does anybody remember me going on for a bit about not knowing who the Admin was using for their political analysis, but knowing they had someone? I pointed out it was pulling from none of the traditional firms or any pet firms that got brought up with them. These fuckers are using -CNN- for their political analysis. Which explains why CNN is being torn down right about now with multiple lawsuits allowed to go through. But -Jesus fucking Christ-.

 

[Salubrious]

Speaking of pissing me off. A mystery was solved recently and I -still- refuse to not be pissed about it.

Does anybody remember me going on for a bit about not knowing who the Admin was using for their political analysis, but knowing they had someone? I pointed out it was pulling from none of the traditional firms or any pet firms that got brought up with them. These fuckers are using -CNN- for their political analysis. Which explains why CNN is being torn down right about now with multiple lawsuits allowed to go through. But -Jesus fucking Christ-.

That explains sooooo much.

 

[Raoul_Duke]

Speaking of pissing me off. A mystery was solved recently and I -still- refuse to not be pissed about it.

Does anybody remember me going on for a bit about not knowing who the Admin was using for their political analysis, but knowing they had someone? I pointed out it was pulling from none of the traditional firms or any pet firms that got brought up with them. These fuckers are using -CNN- for their political analysis. Which explains why CNN is being torn down right about now with multiple lawsuits allowed to go through. But -Jesus fucking Christ-.

Wait wait wait. The admin is using. . .CNN as their political barometer? I know they're retards, but holy Fuck. Their grave isn't six feet under- It's 60!

 

[Kane Lives]

Speaking of pissing me off. A mystery was solved recently and I -still- refuse to not be pissed about it.

Does anybody remember me going on for a bit about not knowing who the Admin was using for their political analysis, but knowing they had someone? I pointed out it was pulling from none of the traditional firms or any pet firms that got brought up with them. These fuckers are using -CNN- for their political analysis. Which explains why CNN is being torn down right about now with multiple lawsuits allowed to go through. But -Jesus fucking Christ-.

... why CNN?

What credential does CNN has in this field?

 

[Gehenna]

Wait wait wait. The admin is using. . .CNN as their political barometer? I know they're retards, but holy Fuck. Their grave isn't six feet under- It's 60!

No, not barometer. This is so much worse. They are handing off sensitive documents and intel too, relying on the polling of, and using CNN as if it were a political analysis firm. Just... fuck.

... why CNN?

What credential does CNN has in this field?

CNN is somewhat bigger than you think, it's not just a news show it's a nexus of Democrat politics with invested interests and appendages covering a wide variety of jobs. The problem is that -nobody in these jobs- are good at their job. It's -all- the rejects. Anyone who does political analysis is told, outright, -do not work for CNN-. For reference, there is a guy who got a D in every Poli Sci class he did in Uni who -still managed to get a job outside of CNN-.

 

[Michael Wade]

Speaking of pissing me off. A mystery was solved recently and I -still- refuse to not be pissed about it.

Does anybody remember me going on for a bit about not knowing who the Admin was using for their political analysis, but knowing they had someone? I pointed out it was pulling from none of the traditional firms or any pet firms that got brought up with them. These fuckers are using -CNN- for their political analysis. Which explains why CNN is being torn down right about now with multiple lawsuits allowed to go through. But -Jesus fucking Christ-.

Shit Id put down a horrifying rating if I could. But out of curiosity if you had to pick a pozzed, shitty, leftest news source, what would be the better option?

 

[Oxous]

No, not barometer. This is so much worse. They are handing off sensitive documents and intel too, relying on the polling of, and using CNN as if it were a political analysis firm. Just... fuck.

You know how you're never supposed to get high on your own supply? Someone needs to tell these pencil pusher fucks that you only give curated content to your propaganda outlets. If you make them do the censoring themselves nobody will spot any errors until it's too late.

 

[Penis Drager]

No, not barometer. This is so much worse. They are handing off sensitive documents and intel too, relying on the polling of, and using CNN as if it were a political analysis firm. Just... fuck.

What I wouldn't do for a horrifying rating...
Any verifiable source on this?

 

[Gehenna]

Shit Id put down a horrifying rating if I could. But out of curiosity if you had to pick a pozzed, shitty, leftest news source, what would be the better option?

The Guardian. No, seriously. It's full of absolute ideologues, but carries some editorial standards and vetting as well as sourcing its stupid opinions.

What I wouldn't do for a horrifying rating...
Any verifiable source on this?

Alas, no. We only found out because some absolute moron responded to our inquiries by emailing back from his CNN work email address.

 

[Drag-on Knight 91873]

Speaking of pissing me off. A mystery was solved recently and I -still- refuse to not be pissed about it.

Does anybody remember me going on for a bit about not knowing who the Admin was using for their political analysis, but knowing they had someone? I pointed out it was pulling from none of the traditional firms or any pet firms that got brought up with them. These fuckers are using -CNN- for their political analysis. Which explains why CNN is being torn down right about now with multiple lawsuits allowed to go through. But -Jesus fucking Christ-.

 

[Sekirodiealot]

98%. I'm extremely confident the medically ineligible category would already make this impossible. This is the confirmation that it was never about herd immunity. Its shut up, sit down, and listen to your betters.

I mean if that doesn't scream unrealistic expectations, i don't known what is. Biden and the branch covidians need to realize that we're nearing the end of this and they should stop trying to artificially extend it

 

[Gehenna]

It does explain why CNN suddenly switched to using only polls over several months though. It's not an accuracy or bending the numbers thing, it's because their polling guys are working full time for the admin. In retrospect, it's kinda obvious but -fuck-.

 

[Raoul_Duke]

It does explain why CNN suddenly switched to using only polls over several months though. It's not an accuracy or bending the numbers thing, it's because their polling guys are working full time for the admin. In retrospect, it's kinda obvious but -fuck-.

. . .My GOD, this country won't make it to 2025, will it?

 

[Oxous]

It does explain why CNN suddenly switched to using monthly polls though. It's not an accuracy or bending the numbers thing, it's because their polling guys are working full time for the admin. In retrospect, it's kinda obvious but -fuck-.

Sounds like all the ingredients for a nice and juicy Breitbart/Fox News article if true, ngl. Since this is clown world, let us pray that one of your co-workers will notice this, whistleblow and provide evidence.

 

[Gehenna]

Sounds like all the ingredients for a nice and juicy Breitbart/Fox News article if true, ngl. Since this is clown world, let us pray that one of your co-workers will notice this, whistleblow and provide evidence.

Oh, if we had more solid evidence we'd not even whistleblow, we'd just hand it off and laugh. We work for a Republican, I'd remind. But one work email isn't solid proof, it was just what got the noggin joggin and everything kinda snapped into place as soon as we looked at it from that angle. It explained so damn much and completely blindsided us at the same time.

 

[Iceland Heavy]

No, not barometer. This is so much worse. They are handing off sensitive documents and intel too, relying on the polling of, and using CNN as if it were a political analysis firm. Just... fuck.


CNN is somewhat bigger than you think, it's not just a news show it's a nexus of Democrat politics with invested interests and appendages covering a wide variety of jobs. The problem is that -nobody in these jobs- are good at their job. It's -all- the rejects. Anyone who does political analysis is told, outright, -do not work for CNN-. For reference, there is a guy who got a D in every Poli Sci class he did in Uni who -still managed to get a job outside of CNN-.

Where does MSNBC fall in the political analysis power rankings then?

 

[Gehenna]

Where does MSNBC fall in the political analysis power rankings then?

"Lol".

Addendum: To expand, MSNBC purged all of its analysts for wrong think, and hired on a bunch of people with their pronouns in their bios. That's all I need to say.

Edit: Oops, said CNN when I meant MSNBC

 

[Titos]

One thing that pisses me off about that Milley faggot is his standard photo they use. Why is he smiling like a retard? Are generals just not expected to have military bearing anymore? I know he's not in formation at attention but jesus christ he looks like he's taking a college yearbook photo, not like a member of the military. Not surprising seeing as military officers are always faggots.

 

[Oxous]

Oh, if we had more solid evidence we'd not even whistleblow, we'd just hand it off and laugh. We work for a Republican, I'd remind. But one work email isn't solid proof, it was just what got the noggin joggin and everything kinda snapped into place as soon as we looked at it from that angle. It explained so damn much and completely blindsided us at the same time.

Ah, that's good. Working for a Republican + the whole workplace talking about it is a nice sign. As a concerned citizen I'd like to know what the Biden Administration is basing its perception of reality off of.

 

[Penis Drager]

Oh, if we had more solid evidence we'd not even whistleblow, we'd just hand it off and laugh. We work for a Republican, I'd remind. But one work email isn't solid proof, it was just what got the noggin joggin and everything kinda snapped into place as soon as we looked at it from that angle. It explained so damn much and completely blindsided us at the same time.

Have you done any serious investigation on the guy the email belongs to?