Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Norm.jpg
 
Re-upload for the site:
Edit: This file actually contains audio and video. It will work in VLC, but doesn't seem to work in the browser/KF. I thought it was just a corrupted header (or something) but re-encoding it didn't seem to help. I'm not very knowledgeable about this stuff, if someone experienced with video can try to recover it, that would be good. Otherwise, I will try again in a few hours after I get home.
Fixed:

(for some reason re-encoding to .webm did the trick.)
 
Last edited:
"You're just dead wrong" this judge is based.

EDIT: HOLY FUCK THIS MORON DOESN'T UNDERSTAND SECTION 230. HOW CAN A JEW (eta: no proof he's a tribe member, but Mayr...) BE SO BAD AT LAWYERING?

He argues that there's no freedom of speech protecting the site owner?!?
 
Last edited:
Judge to Pat's lawyer: "We're goin' around in circles, and you don't seem to understand the principles, sir."

Later

Pat's lawyer: "In the Twitter example, the Twitter custodian of records can be subpoenaed for actual knowledge of the information, and that's in essence what we're attempting to do in this matter...I know you don't necessarily want me to rehash that but if somebody posts something on Twitter we can...there's a custodian of records for Twitter which we can actually subpoena and get the information and that's in essence what this subpoena was supposed to do. Not necessarily ask (verbal fumbling) the reason we can't...we would need the identity [of Quasi] is obviously to subpoena the person that was...the custodian of records, in this case Doe 1. Secondly as to the..."

Judge, interrupting: "If that's what you intended to do, you didn't do it well, because that's not the way the subpoena is phrased, as I indicated earlier."

Pat's lawyer: "Understood."
 
So I've been collecting .pdfs and the audiobooks of Patricks "novels" and I'm planning on posting them what does everyone think of having a Kiwi Book Club and give him some constructive criticism?

I don't think it violates the rules of trolling or pozloading my negholep, but I thought it might be fun to give everyone access to Patrick's "amazing literary works".
 
So I've been collecting .pdfs and the audiobooks of Patricks "novels" and I'm planning on posting them what does everyone think of having a Kiwi Book Club and give him some constructive criticism?

I don't think it violates the rules of trolling or pozloading my neghole, but I thought it might be fun to give everyone access to Patrick's "amazing literary works".
I wouldn't even read Rick's books for free.

Edit: also, this is copyright infringement.
 
Back