Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

[mr.moon1488]

View attachment 2582232

Spoiler

View attachment 2582236

https://twitter.com/StopAntisemites/status/1443018128552833024 (https://archive.ph/SESFp)

Someone really needs to put something up like this with the number for the ADL.

 

[The Last Stand]

Now this one has a good point without subverting into woke hysteria. Margaret Sanger's "eugenics" argument for abortion was discovered to be taken out of context. In short, Sanger's push for abortion for lower income families was praised by Black figures during that time period. One could argue that it can be SKEWED that way through a modern perspective, but that would be revisionist history and disingenuous to Sanger's intention.

 

[Unpaid Emotional Labourer]

I’m pro-choice (pro-abortion in some cases like when the kid was going to be brought up in a degenerate or criminal lifestyle anyway) BUT how exactly is considering every fetus equally worthy of life and protection racist?

How about this: racial equity in abortion. Free for all but whites. And blacks? They get paid for every abortion they have! No whites though, they’ll just have to go ahead and have white babies.

 

[AnOminous]

The House had an abortion hearing of some kind today, which whatever, that's fine and arguably their job. But you'll never guess what some people actually wanted to talk about:

I like how they're revising history to pretend Margaret Sanger did not have some seriously dodgy views.

"The third group are those irresponsible and reckless ones having little regard for the consequences of their acts, or whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. Many of this group are diseased, feeble-minded, and are of the pauper element dependent upon the normal and fit members of society for their support. There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped."

Margaret Sanger, "Birth Control: What It Is, How It Works, What It Will Do."

 

[Unpaid Emotional Labourer]

I like how they're revising history to pretend Margaret Sanger did not have some seriously dodgy views.

"The third group are those irresponsible and reckless ones having little regard for the consequences of their acts, or whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. Many of this group are diseased, feeble-minded, and are of the pauper element dependent upon the normal and fit members of society for their support. There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped."

Margaret Sanger, "Birth Control: What It Is, How It Works, What It Will Do."

Interesting how in this case, they have no problem separating the artist from the art.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

 

[Positron]

Not only do the left can't meme, they can't write remotely credible kiddie talk to save their lives.

 

[RandallBoggs]

Not only do the left can't meme, they can't write remotely credible kiddie talk to save their lives.

When they try to write credible kiddie talk this is the result

 

[AirdropShitposts]

 

[AnOminous]

View attachment 2585924

Needless to say, the retard screeching "DEBOOOONKED" is wrong.

 

[Tootsie Bear]

View attachment 2585924
View attachment 2585926View attachment 2585929

How much money you want to bet this person isn't of Native American/Canadian descent. And looking at Wikipedia (yes, I know) the land bridge theory hasn't been debunked at all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beringia
Regardless simps are going to simp, and paying money to a random moronic SJW sounds depressing.

 

[KiwiFarmerSimulator2021]

View attachment 2585758

When did people start being like this.

 

[Art Kassul]

View attachment 2584907

Vaush fans don’t know how to meme

Sorry republicans stay losing *black painted nails* *black painted nails* *black painted nails*

 

[Cilleystring]

Starts off with "so you see that's why black people are killed by cops at a rate 3x higher than white people"

First, he doesn't even give the explanation of why. Second, I'm not sure if that's true.

Lol "that doesn't make sense. just because you commit more violent crime doesnt mean you interact with the police more?"

Yes, it does. This moron admits he thinks blacks commit more crimes and suggests we should just let them go at it. So progressive!

"what about black on black crime? Thats not racially motivated"

So the only crimes that matter are ones where the race differs between criminal and victim. Again, so progressive.

 

[ShortBusDriver]

Now this one has a good point without subverting into woke hysteria. Margaret Sanger's "eugenics" argument for abortion was discovered to be taken out of context. In short, Sanger's push for abortion for lower income families was praised by Black figures during that time period. One could argue that it can be SKEWED that way through a modern perspective, but that would be revisionist history and disingenuous to Sanger's intention.

I don't really think it was taken out of context, sure she was partnered with African American groups but she was a xenophobic loon who thought criminality was a genetic condition and we needed to free society of undesirables, namely retards, Mexicans and sometimes black people.

 

[LurkNoMore]

What is she even on about?




This idiot has nearly 20k tweets and only 58 followers...

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

The House had an abortion hearing of some kind today, which whatever, that's fine and arguably their job. But you'll never guess what some people actually wanted to talk about:
View attachment 2585244View attachment 2585246
View attachment 2585247View attachment 2585249

> pro-life laws hurt... blacks and Latinos

Yeah, sure. Let's see who's doing the hurting:

We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

 

[AmazingEagle]

Starts off with "so you see that's why black people are killed by cops at a rate 3x higher than white people"

First, he doesn't even give the explanation of why. Second, I'm not sure if that's true.

Lol "that doesn't make sense. just because you commit more violent crime doesnt mean you interact with the police more?"

Yes, it does. This moron admits he thinks blacks commit more crimes and suggests we should just let them go at it. So progressive!

"what about black on black crime? Thats not racially motivated"

So the only crimes that matter are ones where the race differs between criminal and victim. Again, so progressive.

This guy's Twitter and YouTube channel is a gold mine for leftist cringe. https://twitter.com/jollygoodginger/status/1440877323151192071?s=20

Jollly Good Ginger | Linktree

Raised by bigots, I now educate to eradicate bigotry in all forms.

linktr.ee

 

[LetterlandMafia]

View attachment 2586407
What is she even on about?


View attachment 2586406

This idiot has nearly 20k tweets and only 58 followers...

I swear 99% of the time NotAllMen trends it's women/fellow traveller men complaining about the idea of men saying Not All Men and not because anyone's actually said it.

 

[InteracialBowelSyndrome]

I swear 99% of the time NotAllMen trends it's women/fellow traveller men complaining about the idea of men saying Not All Men and not because anyone's actually said it.

The people who attack the "Not All Men" arguement with "Well it's enough men to be a problem" sure get uppity when you replace "Men" with demographics famous for committing homicides or flying planes into buildings.