Davis M.J. Aurini and Jordan Owen - Dysfunctional Creators of The Sarkeesian Effect and their farce on display

[chimpburgers]

Alright here are some screenshots.

Pussy.

One of the top rated comments. I think this one is referring to Clarey and it's comment criticizing MGTOW.

I thought the one comment about Sargon was from Aurini but that was referring to someone else.

 

[Bungleboy]

It truly is a retard fight.

THe alt-right would be really creepy if they weren't universally crippled by tism

 

[chimpburgers]

This video is old but I forgot just how cringeworthy it was. I just had to share it here.

 

[Fraudius]

It is interesting that Davis Aurini's depiction of Anita Sarkeesian is a dead ringer for Davis Aurini himself... a narcissistic, pseudo-intellectual poseur. His entire philosophy is a huge case of projecting his own considerable failings upon the rest of the world.

 

[Andy27]

This video is old but I forgot just how cringeworthy it was. I just had to share it here.

How was this idiot taken seriously enough to get crowdfunded for that "documentary" about SJWs and Sarkeesian by anyone? Even if someone has no knowledge of what he is talking about, just the first 7 seconds are enough to send any bullshit detector into overdrive. People who have something valuable to say don't need to resort to that ridiculous, pretentionus way of speaking.

 

[HickoryDickory]

How was this idiot taken seriously enough to get crowdfunded for that "documentary" about SJWs and Sarkeesian by anyone? Even if someone has no knowledge of what he is talking about, just the first 7 seconds are enough to send any bullshit detector into overdrive. People who have something valuable to say don't need to resort to that ridiculous, pretentionus way of speaking.

I think it was because he hit while people were having knee-jerk reactions, and managed to trick a few YouTubers into promoting his project. When I saw the plugs on my feed I automatically thought "People aren't this gullible, are they?", but...

 

[AnOminous]

It is interesting that Davis Aurini's depiction of Anita Sarkeesian is a dead ringer for Davis Aurini himself... a narcissistic, pseudo-intellectual poseur. His entire philosophy is a huge case of projecting his own considerable failings upon the rest of the world.

It's pretty bad when you pride yourself on being better than Anita Sarkeesian and you actually are one of the few people who aren't.

 

[chimpburgers]

How was this idiot taken seriously enough to get crowdfunded for that "documentary" about SJWs and Sarkeesian by anyone? Even if someone has no knowledge of what he is talking about, just the first 7 seconds are enough to send any bullshit detector into overdrive. People who have something valuable to say don't need to resort to that ridiculous, pretentionus way of speaking.

It's the same feeling when I watch Roosh in a video. I believe they're failed PUAs trying to cover up for their failures and inadequacy as people. It really shows with Aurini especially. Anyone who keeps associating with them is either just plain fucking stupid, actually share some of Aurini's values or they have a financial interest in him.

 

[Trombonista]

It's pretty bad when you pride yourself on being better than Anita Sarkeesian and you actually are one of the few people who aren't.

So if Anita Sarkeesian is Chris, Aurini is Anthony Logatto?

 

[*Asterisk*]

So if Anita Sarkeesian is Chris, Aurini is Anthony Logatto?

Probably lower. Anita's made a lot more money and has had a lot more success being a professional victim, adopting ludicrous political positions without a trace of irony or self-awereness, and avoiding a real job at any costs. It's a much wider gap than Chris and Logatto.

Maybe Aurini's knowledge of keyboard shortcuts will help him close the gap.

 

[chimpburgers]

Aurini got into another spat with Sargon of Akkad and from the looks of it, Dean Esmay also got involved kind of. Here's how that worked out and then he whined on Thunderf00t's page after that to accuse him of lying. The funniest part is how he still thinks his keyboard shortcuts are legit filmmaking.

I think we should keep an eye on his Twitter. There's probably some other lulzy content there.

https://archive.is/wrEUO

In case people aren't up to speed with what Aurini's referring to, I made a topic earlier about that woman in Lolcows here.

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/jennifer-keller-aka-laughing-witch.13452/#post-1036307

 

[*Asterisk*]

Hey, Aurini.

Guess what? I've seen every second of your "The Jewish Question" video! I've even encouraged others on this board to watch the whole thing without interruption or distraction before! I'll even post the whole thing down below right now!

Guess what? You sound even worse in context than this excerpt below!

There was no German plan to exterminate the Jews.

With respect of the Jewish Question, the Führer has decided to make a clean sweep. He prophesied to the Jews that if they again brought about a world war, they would live to see their annihilation in it. That wasn't just a catch-word. The world war is here, and the annihilation of the Jews must be the necessary consequence.

I just love how you deny the Holocaust, blame it on the Western Allies, blame it on the Soviets, blame it on "invisibilizing", as Sophie LaBelle would say, other minorities who were victims of the Shoah, cite your conclusions to an "independent historian" whose name you neither mention nor whose work you link to in your video or any place else, and do all this simultaneously without the slightest trace of irony or contradiction.

Fuck me, even David Irving cites his sources. Aurini, for all your so-badly-wish-I-was-Anton-LeVay posturing, you're not even on the level of this guy:

Lock yourself in a prison shower, tattoo "I know what boys like" in your tramp-stamp region, and get raped to death you fucking Faggoty Ann and Andy-ass natsoc sped.

 

[Fraudius]

Sources? Sources are for leftist beta cucks. The only source a real man needs is his own ass.

 

[K>C]

At least, Irving got his sources from ex Wehrmacht and SS people, whereas Aurini would creep them the fuck out. A funny thought I had, if he was sent to 19th century America, he would bitch about anti Italian persecution.

 

[Lorento]

What exactly was the point of the video again? He didn't actually have any arguements, he sort of rambled about the Holocaust, then tried to claim that it wasn't as bad as people said it was and to 'Look in context' and then tried to be all buddy buddy with 'Mainstream Jews.'

That video was entirely pointless.

 

[xXRonPaul_42020Xx]

Dont remember what video, but this guy got caught changing the pitch of his videos to make his voice sound deeper.

Also, http://www.koanicsoul.com/blog/2012/11/01/the-great-neanderthal-novel-has-been-written/

 

[autisticdragonkin]

Men are designed to gather resources from the environment, women are designed to gather resources from men

Manospheretards say this all the time but what does it actually mean. All men and women in a contemporary market economy gather resources from men (and women) which are part of the environment. This also produces both consumer and producer surplus so it is mutually beneficial

What exactly was the point of the video again? He didn't actually have any arguements, he sort of rambled about the Holocaust, then tried to claim that it wasn't as bad as people said it was and to 'Look in context' and then tried to be all buddy buddy with 'Mainstream Jews.'

That video was entirely pointless.

I think that the point was to make him look like a douche (and thus get manosphere cred) by simultaneously being a Nazi and embodying everything that the Nazis attributed to Jews (drinking, smoking, conspicuous consumption, social parasitism, deceptiveness)

 

[Lorento]

I think that the point was to make him look like a douche (and thus get manosphere cred) by simultaneously being a Nazi and embodying everything that the Nazis attributed to Jews (drinking, smoking, conspicuous consumption, social parasitism, deceptiveness)

But it was also an incredibly flip floppy video, with no real cohesive structure. He said that 'I'm not saying the Holocaust didn't happen' then tried to justify the mass starvation in Belsen and other work camps by saying that Germany was in a famine at that point. Y'know, because forced labour is totally okay, as long as you feed them properly!

 

[autisticdragonkin]

But it was also an incredibly flip floppy video, with no real cohesive structure. He said that 'I'm not saying the Holocaust didn't happen' then tried to justify the mass starvation in Belsen and other work camps by saying that Germany was in a famine at that point. Y'know, because forced labour is totally okay, as long as you feed them properly!

The flip flopping makes him come off even worse, both sides will see him as being deceptive and on the other side. It makes him look like a douche and that's all that matters

 

[*Asterisk*]

But it was also an incredibly flip floppy video, with no real cohesive structure. He said that 'I'm not saying the Holocaust didn't happen' then tried to justify the mass starvation in Belsen and other work camps by saying that Germany was in a famine at that point. Y'know, because forced labour is totally okay, as long as you feed them properly!

Personally, I think the two-faced nature of Aurini's arguments come from the fact that he knows racism and Holocaust Denial are largely unpopular. He wants to be able to espouse his horrible racism without bearing the stigma of actually being racist.

You see this shit happen all the time. I've seen people from Roger Waters to Carlos LaTuff to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Pat Buchanan pull the exact same stunts on numerous occasions for the exact same reasons. Aurini just happens to be exceptionally retarded, so he's not even talented at being two faced.