- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
I didn't see this! Can you post a link?
Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner
- Thread starter Cryin RN
- Start date
Miami
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2021
Her work history in Utah ends a little bit before Russ made the decision to move, I find it odd on his timing.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
That is spooky, We know to his brain that NO Means YES,
I wouldn't put it past him to moved there to try and keep tabs on her in case he thinks shes single.
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
Thanks for the link. I couldn't remember her last name. That is scary now. So the Probation Violation saga might still be happening! Good for us, bad for poor Erika who did absolutely nothing to bring this on herself. I hope she's aware Russ is in the area.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
Hopefully Skordas knows that she is in Greers proximity. And hopefully she knows he is once again local to her?
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
This is the one time I'd break the no contact rule and reach out to her just to make sure she's aware. This isn't trolling, this is a potential safety issue.
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2019
I had no idea she moved to Vegas. This is a really interesting bit of information.
I highly doubt she’s unaware
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
Best option would be for Null to mention it to Skordas. Wasn’t he her lawyer? If so he can reach out to her to make sure everything is alright.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
No, Erika has her own lawyer, but Mr. Skordas helped in some way with the case (maybe giving info). YES, Mr. Skordas should be informed and YES someone NEEDS to tell Erika. IDGAF if she might already know--this is a safety issue, not just for her, but for another potential victim should he start up again and fail.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
Settle down. We don't know what she knows. We don't know if Russ knows shes in Vegas. It might be pure coincidence. Contacting her directly is being as creepy as Greer. Like I said let Skordas know. Let her lawyer know. Let them do any and all communications from there. Otherwise don't pozload my negholep.
Miami
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2021
I've been in the situation in the past where a stalkery-former-friend tried to make the issues between us all about my mental illness and this that and the other thing were because I was crazy and delusional and needed help. Yadda yadda same crap he's doing to Erika. It's a shitty and uncomfortable situation.
One thing to note is his slander of her has grown over time, in how he describes her and her actions towards him in the past. He's doing a lot of "winning" lately and if he is in Vegas not by coincidence then there's the fact he's still got a unpredictable side to him that could very much take things for a sharp turn if he keeps getting slapped down by the court and whatever else. He's too stupid and has repeatedly shot himself in the foot for the gaslighting tier of bullshit to work in any way on Erika, but him eventually flipping his beans is very much still on the table.
But since Russell took shit further than that person did and got himself in legal trouble, it can be assumed that Erika or those close to her are most likely keeping an eye on Russell if they still perceive him to be an active threat. He has also been very open about his move to Vegas and his following activities.
As it currently stands, it would be breaking the rule of no contact if it was anybody other than Null talking to Skordas and letting it go from there, because Russell's insistence on bringing it up in his court documents kicked that door wide open for Null and Skordas to pull from.
One thing to note is his slander of her has grown over time, in how he describes her and her actions towards him in the past. He's doing a lot of "winning" lately and if he is in Vegas not by coincidence then there's the fact he's still got a unpredictable side to him that could very much take things for a sharp turn if he keeps getting slapped down by the court and whatever else. He's too stupid and has repeatedly shot himself in the foot for the gaslighting tier of bullshit to work in any way on Erika, but him eventually flipping his beans is very much still on the table.
But since Russell took shit further than that person did and got himself in legal trouble, it can be assumed that Erika or those close to her are most likely keeping an eye on Russell if they still perceive him to be an active threat. He has also been very open about his move to Vegas and his following activities.
As it currently stands, it would be breaking the rule of no contact if it was anybody other than Null talking to Skordas and letting it go from there, because Russell's insistence on bringing it up in his court documents kicked that door wide open for Null and Skordas to pull from.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
>informing someone of a potential safety hazard in form of that person's convicted harrasser is as creepy as the harrasser.
Even if you are against contacting her, surely you don't actually believe what you just said?
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2017
Well, if Russell didn't know Erika moved to Las Vegas, he certainly knows NOW.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
and the op title might include inmate number with it if Russ tries to explain but I think he knows.
Stalkers and ones like him never give up..unless they are dead.
He isn't one to give up and in his book he claims "He paid money to find the info on TS management" so he could do this from a computer at a library,internet cafe,found a lost phone ect.
I wouldn't put it past him.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
August 2017: Judge Kraft, Attorney Skordas, The Ariana Grande Case
“It certainly appears that… Mr. Greer got what he contracted for. So I don’t see negligence. I don’t see the harassment, certainly by the two defendants. Perhaps if there was a security guard, a named person, or somebody of that nature. But the vicarious nature of negligent responsibility, all the way up to a named artist, is not proper or allowed by our law. So I don’t see harassment. I certainly don’t see negligence.
I spent the time on this to go through this very carefully so that Mr. Greer understood the ruling behind this today. I’m denying Mr. Greer’s claims for relief that he’s made in his affidavit and summons, denying his reimbursements of fees, service, costs, and any other costs.
Pursuant to my discretion under Utah law, I have to make a determination that this was brought in bad faith. If this was a non-meritorious claim. If this was only here to harass, to annoy, for ulterior purposes. I find that that is the case. I might understand… I have no reason to disbelieve, I don’t know Mr. Greer. If he subjectively believes he had certain rights and duties owed to him, that may be true. You might believe you do. That doesn’t mean it’s true. You don’t have those rights.
And bringing a lawsuit, and again, not that this weighs on this case, but the court certainly considers repetitive litigious nature of a plaintiff. It does appear that this is not the first time that this has happened. Based on the repeated nature of that, the claims that have been made, and unfortunately the failure to state a claim that can be even granted, even if I did believe that there was something nefarious or inappropriate that went on. I don’t find that this claim was brought in good faith. I do believe that it has no merit.
Before you came Mr. Greer, 35 minutes late, I asked Mr. Skordas the type of fees that he has incurred on this. Based on my discretion, pursuant to Utah law, I’m awarding $1500 of attorney’s fees to the defendants for their time incurred and expenses to defend this non-meritorious action. That is my ruling for the day. You might not like it Mr. Greer, but do you have any questions?
R: I understand.”
Despite the best efforts of Judge Kraft, a sizable financial hit to his wallet ($1,500) and an overall mortifying experience, Russell Greer proved he learned nothing from the situation with his latest filings.
Instead, he has again submitted an almost picture-perfect copy of his 2017 fuck-up. The highlighted portions could be written about the recently dismissed case - instead of vicarious liability, now he’s just blaming Null for every post on here, Reddit and elsewhere, crafted by any number of random humans.
“It certainly appears that… Mr. Greer got what he contracted for. So I don’t see negligence. I don’t see the harassment, certainly by the two defendants. Perhaps if there was a security guard, a named person, or somebody of that nature. But the vicarious nature of negligent responsibility, all the way up to a named artist, is not proper or allowed by our law. So I don’t see harassment. I certainly don’t see negligence.
I spent the time on this to go through this very carefully so that Mr. Greer understood the ruling behind this today. I’m denying Mr. Greer’s claims for relief that he’s made in his affidavit and summons, denying his reimbursements of fees, service, costs, and any other costs.
Pursuant to my discretion under Utah law, I have to make a determination that this was brought in bad faith. If this was a non-meritorious claim. If this was only here to harass, to annoy, for ulterior purposes. I find that that is the case. I might understand… I have no reason to disbelieve, I don’t know Mr. Greer. If he subjectively believes he had certain rights and duties owed to him, that may be true. You might believe you do. That doesn’t mean it’s true. You don’t have those rights.
And bringing a lawsuit, and again, not that this weighs on this case, but the court certainly considers repetitive litigious nature of a plaintiff. It does appear that this is not the first time that this has happened. Based on the repeated nature of that, the claims that have been made, and unfortunately the failure to state a claim that can be even granted, even if I did believe that there was something nefarious or inappropriate that went on. I don’t find that this claim was brought in good faith. I do believe that it has no merit.
Before you came Mr. Greer, 35 minutes late, I asked Mr. Skordas the type of fees that he has incurred on this. Based on my discretion, pursuant to Utah law, I’m awarding $1500 of attorney’s fees to the defendants for their time incurred and expenses to defend this non-meritorious action. That is my ruling for the day. You might not like it Mr. Greer, but do you have any questions?
R: I understand.”
Despite the best efforts of Judge Kraft, a sizable financial hit to his wallet ($1,500) and an overall mortifying experience, Russell Greer proved he learned nothing from the situation with his latest filings.
Instead, he has again submitted an almost picture-perfect copy of his 2017 fuck-up. The highlighted portions could be written about the recently dismissed case - instead of vicarious liability, now he’s just blaming Null for every post on here, Reddit and elsewhere, crafted by any number of random humans.
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
He probably did. He most likely followed her social media from a burner account. This does put his move to Vegas in a whole new light.
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2021
Does Erica have a restraining order?
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2017
I believe she does, but I'm not 100% sure.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
Move to Las Vegas got him a 2 for 1, Hookers and time to let her cool down so he can...explain.
Question. If his probation ends then 2 weeks later contacts her..what trouble could happen to him?
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2017
Good question, I think it depends on if she has a restraining order against him that's still in effect.