Horrorcow Tommy Tooter / Thomas Wasserberg - Dog-Abusing, Trash-Eating Pedo, Neo-Nazi, Fake Tranny, "1st-Wave Incel", Hounded YouTuber to Suicide

like i said, what's most pitiful is you pathetic self loathing sociopaths take yourselves seriously. You can't ever make me as insane as you or destroy my credibility with my audience.
So let’s see if I’ve got this straight.

1. You want to sue us for libel. However, you are unable to provide any specific examples of lies we have told. Those you have offered have either been conclusively demonstrated to be true based upon your own words or are unprovable either way.

2. You want to sue Null or Kiwi Farms. Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, this is not possible. You would have to sue each of us individually.

3. You have threatened us with prison, yet this is not a criminal libel matter. The alleged lies against you do not harm the wider community.

4. You have threatened us with damages. Yet according to the post quoted above, you have suffered no financial damages as a result of of the alleged lies. There has been no damage to your health, career or reputation. Indeed, you suggest that it is not possible for us to harm you. Therefore, a judge can offer no financial recompense.

This lawsuit isn’t looking too hopeful, is it, old Tom?
 
In court, the burden of proof is on you to prove the accusations are true, demented dolt.
ACCUSATION: Tom does creepy shit around kids.

JUDGE: Hmmm. A very serious charge. I certainly hope you have some evidence for this or I'm giving the beautiful, creative, and charming Miss Tommie all of your stuff and locking you in prison for life without the possibility of parole.

*produces Sabrina Post*
what's mommy getting you this year for christmans, you useless parasitic vidiot?
This year my mommy is NOT cutting me out of the will. What'd your parents get you Tommy?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: BlueArmedDevil
The only criminal here is you, you fucking pedophile.

Nobody online is willing to talk to this repulsive pervert, and if he talked his pedo shit in public with actual people around, he'd get his face caved in. More than it is already.
good lord you are one fucking mean, stupid self loathing loser living in a virtual reality. i pity your grandparents because your parents must be complete assholes to raise such a fucking angry autistic asshole as you.
ACCUSATION: Tom does creepy shit around kids.

JUDGE: Hmmm. A very serious charge. I certainly hope you have some evidence for this or I'm giving the beautiful, creative, and charming Miss Tommie all of your stuff and locking you in prison for life without the possibility of parole.

*produces Sabrina Post*

This year my mommy is NOT cutting me out of the will. What'd your parents get you Tommy?
lol. what's really pitiful about all this, is you fucking infantile imbeciles take yourselves seriously. your construct of me is completely insane and you will be laughed out of any courtroom you try to present it in.
 
lol. what's really pitiful about all this, is you fucking infantile imbeciles take yourselves seriously. your construct of me is completely insane and you will be laughed out of any courtroom you try to present it in.
No, you’re the one threatening us with a lolsuit. You seem more confused than ever. Seriously, you need that cognitive impairment test.
 
So let’s see if I’ve got this straight.

1. You want to sue us for libel. However, you are unable to provide any specific examples of lies we have told. Those you have offered have either been conclusively demonstrated to be true based upon your own words or are unprovable either way.

2. You want to sue Null or Kiwi Farms. Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, this is not possible. You would have to sue each of us individually.

3. You have threatened us with prison, yet this is not a criminal libel matter. The alleged lies against you do not harm the wider community.

4. You have threatened us with damages. Yet according to the post quoted above, you have suffered no financial damages as a result of of the alleged lies. There has been no damage to your health, career or reputation. Indeed, you suggest that it is not possible for us to harm you. Therefore, a judge can offer no financial recompense.

This lawsuit isn’t looking too hopeful, is it, old Tom?
you have it all wrong. i am suing the site hosts for consumer fraud and gross negligence for aiding and abetting a criminal conspiracy to interdict my web presence and get me killed if possible and law enforcement agencies for not doing anything about it. my well being has been severely impacted and my friends have been contacted trying to harm my relationships with them. Punitive damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress are huge, sped.

there has been a demonstrable financial loss of at least $100, 000 to myself and El Paso Rock shop behind the Parisho lie at the gem show. You are all violating numerous state and federal statutes , deluding yourselves into believing that what you are doing is protected by the first amendment and fair usage doctrine, when it isn't . fighting words are not protected speech, nor is false witness. What you call satire and parody is defamatory fiction and actionable. By allowing it on the site in violation of his own TOS, @Null is going to be easy to slam dunk for fraud and negligence, seeing as I have a number of other cows as co-plaintiffs committed up front and dozens who have said they would sign on once anything is filed, like Sophie LaBelle and Brianna Wu.

Suing individuals on the internet is a waste of time and money. Making them believe you intend to sue them is priceless. keep trying, my bitch. eventually you may figure it out.
 
what's mommy getting you this year for christmans, you useless parasitic vidiot?
well i can talk with her and visit her everytime i want. i dont need my brother in law as a buffer between myself and my direct family because im not a pedo dogfucker who shits himself. can you do that tommy boy? eh? tommy? can you speak with your mother? tom? mr wasserberg?
 
Anyone else stop reading after the first sentence? The crazy was off the charts.

I would say shart or get off the pot on contacting the attorney generals office but we all know far too much about your bowel problems.....
well i can talk with her and visit her everytime i want. i dont need my brother in law as a buffer between myself and my direct family because im not a pedo dogfucker who shits himself. can you do that tommy boy? eh? tommy? can you speak with your mother? tom? mr wasserberg?
1633365018857.png
 
you have it all wrong. i am suing the site hosts for consumer fraud and gross negligence for aiding and abetting a criminal conspiracy to interdict my web presence and get me killed if possible and law enforcement agencies for not doing anything about it.
And can you provide evidence of this conspiracy?
my well being has been severely impacted and my friends have been contacted trying to harm my relationships with them. Punitive damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress are huge, sped.

there has been a demonstrable financial loss of at least $100, 000 to myself and El Paso Rock shop behind the Parisho lie at the gem show.
This goes directly against multiple statements you have made here.
You are all violating numerous state and federal statutes , deluding yourselves into believing that what you are doing is protected by the first amendment and fair usage doctrine, when it isn't .
Yes it is.
fighting words are not protected speech, nor is false witness.
Neither of those things are applicable here
What you call satire and parody is defamatory fiction and actionable.
As you claim to be a public figure with a large audience, you are not eligible for protection against this. Nor have you provided any specific instances of libel.

By allowing it on the site in violation of his own TOS, @Null is going to be easy to slam dunk for fraud and negligence, seeing as I have a number of other cows as co-plaintiffs committed up front and dozens who have said they would sign on once anything is filed, like Sophie LaBelle and Brianna Wu.
Once again, Section 230 means this is not applicable. It doesn’t matter how many idiots disagree.
Suing individuals on the internet is a waste of time and money. Making them believe you intend to sue them is priceless. keep trying, my bitch. eventually you may figure it out.
But nobody believed you were going to sue them. This paragraph does not make sense. You’re literally contradicting yourself within the same post.

I implore you to get a cognitive impairment test, because you are clearly unable to comprehend words even from one sentence to the next. I am not joking. You are showing signs of severe dementia.
 
You are all violating numerous state and federal statutes , deluding yourselves into believing that what you are doing is protected by the first amendment and fair usage doctrine, when it isn't .
How is remembering things that you've written and drawing reasonable conclusions from them not protected under the First Amendment, again?
 
i am suing the site hosts for consumer fraud and gross negligence for aiding and abetting a criminal conspiracy to interdict my web presence and get me killed if possible and law enforcement agencies for not doing anything about it.
Lol. Suing kiwifarms, cloudflare and law enforcement? What law enforcement? South Tucson PD, or the RCMP from Whitehorse you called back in the day, or the legal system itself?

Good luck with the most expensive set of court cases in history, Tom. Maybe we can get Judge Judy on it! To think you call us the butthurt ones.
 
Back