Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Null is just her latest fixation. She's sued her college, landlords, CPS, Andrew. Anyone who comes into contact with who she thinks she can get money out of, basically. I have no doubt that when she finally is forced to bugger off from Josh, she will find a new and probably hilarious new target

This severely mentally ill cunt needs to be cut off from the legal system with the exception of the hearing that has her parental rights terminated.
 
It's a dark day if a Kiwi learned something new from Melinda...
We learn new things from Mel almost every week. Granted they are generally cautionary tales about things you should never do. Mel is a fantastic lesson in poor life decisions, how an unwarranted sense of entitlement gets you nowhere, and how crazy people should avoid breeding. Her case filings will be taught in law schools for years to come.
 
I'll never limit my thirst trolling, and I bother Null enough as is. If I weren't a pay pig he would probably have already banned me from the site period. I like that he gives me attention though :) I made my appeal to the mod team with no response. I"ll take the L.

Yup. I messaged Trombonista and she confirmed it. Some other mod banned me for thirst posting. I'm not going to try to get her to stick up for me. She recommended that I post to the message a mod or whatever it is thread. I did and it fell on deaf ears. I know that mod wars can start from stupid little shit like this so I'm not going to push it. If the community want's to rise up for my cause though, have at it.

I still don't know why I'm banned from Pam's thread. It even happened when I was posting less in there, not that Pam or the thread has slowed down any.
I'd love to see the insanity that is her book, though.

Mods on Pam's thread are weird. They banned me once for contributing too much, and once for engaging Pam in a debate. Frankly, I am not sure why they don't lock the thread. They achieve the same result by banning most of the people that post there (most bans like mine were temporary, IIRC).

Thank you.

I half suspect I got banned for ruining the kayfabe of people pretending to be the people Pam's obsessed with.
 
New doc.

image-000001.png
image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png
image-000005.png
image-000006.png
image-000007.png
image-000008.png
image-000009.png
 

Attachments

Isn't there a word for when you accuse someone of doing something that you, yourself are in fact doing?
It's like inception. Not only does she frequently project her own behaviors and feelings onto others, she, who projects like the entire movie theater, accuses others of projection.
 
“Hardin hasn’t proved any of my filings are “frivolous” which the court defines as delusional.”

Sweetheart, we all saw the allegation you put forth on the word of an anonymous troll email that Hardin, Null and Judge Jones are are smoking cigars in the Masonic lodge laughing at you. That’s fucking delusional. Judge Jones prefers tacos.
 
Mods on Pam's thread are weird. They banned me once for contributing too much, and once for engaging Pam in a debate. Frankly, I am not sure why they don't lock the thread. They achieve the same result by banning most of the people that post there (most bans like mine were temporary, IIRC).
I had gotten a temp ban once before for trying to become a lolcow. Those words were in jest. If they had any real sense they would ban me for trying to become a grifter. That is the true path to becoming a lolcow.
I still don't know why I'm banned from Pam's thread. It even happened when I was posting less in there, not that Pam or the thread has slowed down any.
I'd love to see the insanity that is her book, though.
I'm still doing that. The mexicans that are supposed to be delivering me fiber optic internet were on my road today surveying. Spoiler alert. When we were on her thread accusing her of things, she had already written a book accusing her mother of such things. It will be a fun read.
 
NEW!

image-000001.png
image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png
image-000004.png
image-000001.png
image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png

Hardin claims this appeal will cost Null, at least, $9250.30, and so he asks the appeal bond to be this high as well

Edit: Hardin made same points as I did previously

Screenshot 2021-10-05 214750.png
Screenshot 2021-10-05 214853.png
Screenshot 2021-10-05 214834.png
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Back