- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
My god, over $9120 in fees minimum.NEW!
Supplemental MOTION for Appeal Bond (to Set the Amount) by Joshua Moon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My god, over $9120 in fees minimum.NEW!
Supplemental MOTION for Appeal Bond (to Set the Amount) by Joshua Moon.
That's the interesting bit. You are citing the number in exhibit 1. The motion itself asks for $9250.30. I suppose the $9250.30 is the realistic amount, while the lower one is, as he said, the lowest possible estimate.My god, over $9120 in fees minimum.
I meant what's been paid to him already. Going to appeals will mean another $9250 right? So total will cost him $18350 right if it's appealed?That's the interesting bit. You are citing the number in exhibit 1. The motion itself asks for $9250.30
That's not how I read it. It says "It is a fair estimate that Mr. Moon’s costs on appeal will equal or exceed $9250.30.". On the appeal bits he already spent only $270 as I understand it, and it is part of that $9250.30I meant what's been paid to him already. Going to appeals will mean another $9250 right? So total will cost him $18350 right if it's appealed?
Well that's a lot better. I'd hate for Josh to have pay out that much just to fight some dimwitted bitch in court. Going have to slide Null some cash during my year break in 2023 if the site is still around.That's not how I read it. It says "It is a fair estimate that Mr. Moon’s costs on appeal will equal or exceed $9250.30.". On the appeal bits he already spent only $270 as I understand it, and it is part of that $9250.30
At first I thought, "That's all?" But then I read it, and yeah that's just for the current appeal, he's also planning to file a separate motion for "already-accrued" fees and costs, which I imagine would be considerable after all this.Hardin claims this appeal will cost Null, at least, $9250.30, and so he asks the appeal bond to be this high as well
A match made in hell...Mel is tied with Greer for Bad faith lawsuits.
Those 2 put the same crap and keep pushing it.
Oooohhhhhh, Hardin getting spicy, "ad nauseum" [sic], "risibly." She's gonna be pissed after she looks those terms up.Hardin replies in Appellate Court
Let's help her!"ad nauseum"
He just needs to be billed by Hardin, no proof of payment is required. I guess in theory they can agree that Josh will pay only after he collects from Melinda.I just know that she's going to demand Josh's bank/ cc informatio or receipts to prove that he has paid Hardin.
I’m sure Josh has already laid out a great deal in up front payments. Hardin doesn’t work for charity. Nor are either under any illusions about actually getting anything from Melinda. But getting a fee award on the books and the appeal bond in place is really the only tool they have to bring an end to the bitch’s insanity.He just needs to be billed by Hardin, no proof of payment is required. I guess in theory they can agree that Josh will pay only after he collects from Melinda.
Sure thing. I'm just pointing out she's not entitled to any information regarding payments Josh made in relation to the case.I’m sure Josh has already laid out a great deal in up front payments. Hardin doesn’t work for charity. Nor are either under any illusions about actually getting anything from Melinda. But getting a fee award on the books and the appeal bond in place is really the only tool they have to bring an end to the bitch’s insanity.
My only gripe is he spells ad nauseam as ad nauseum, a pet peeve of mine. Considering that's my only complaint and is completely autistic, this is pretty rock solid.Hardin replies in Appellate Court
Well, she is if he's seeking those fees.Sure thing. I'm just pointing out she's not entitled to any information regarding payments Josh made in relation to the case.
That applies to the motion to collect fees already accrued, if that's ever filed, which Hardin seems to indicate it will be. What the appeal bond does is more or less kills the suit dead and buries it at the crossroads with a stake through its heart.At first I thought, "That's all?" But then I read it, and yeah that's just for the current appeal, he's also planning to file a separate motion for "already-accrued" fees and costs, which I imagine would be considerable after all this.
Indeed, but she's just going to file another (free) response in which she gripes about the definition of "frivolous" again.
I mean she needs to know the amount and it needs to be confirmed that Null was billed by Hardin but does she need to know if it was already paid?Well, she is if he's seeking those fees.