Tom, Fuck off and leave me alone!

It's times like these where I'm glad that I don't watch his YouTube channel.

Defamation, you say?
Screenshot_20210811-022512_Chrome.jpg

Love how he downplays the fact that he admitted to performing a sex act on the minor in question by 1) playing the “she was pretty much 16” card and then 2) going on to shift the blame to her by implying that she was a slutty slutty slutpants because she’d already either fooled around with a kid her own age or sadly been taken advantage of by another adult before him. Sounds familiar, doesn’t it? “Damn slutty dog rubbed her ass on me, she must have wanted it!”

Ya nasty, Mr Tom-Bomb. Ya fuckin’ nasty.
 
my uncle approves of spending one large on a lawyer to get some relief from the cyberterrorism you and your sidekick are directing at me , fed by the AMBeasts.
But your uncle is dead...... also I think you greatly overestimate the legal buying power of one thousand dollars.
 
It's times like these where I'm glad that I don't watch his YouTube channel.

Defamation, you say?
Screenshot_20210811-022512_Chrome.jpg
Am I right in thinking, his justification is "It's totes legits okay guise, if I statutory raped her, cos I weren't first!!!"???


Please slap me down if I am wrong, apologies if I am.
 
Am I right in thinking, his justification is "It's totes legits okay guise, if I statutory raped her, cos I weren't first!!!"???
For his current telling of the event, yes.

Others have ran the gambit of straight up denial, it was an "erotic fiction" writing exercise while lusting over her and he only kissed and hugged her platonically.
 
Sabrina was younger than 16, and had been previously sexually exploited per your own words.

Not consensual.
Not harmless.

Kill yourself you piece of shit pedo
Yeah. In fact, it was a short period of time before her 15th birthday according to Tom. Tom diddly-diddled a 14 year old, that's a fact.

@Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg Eat a big ole' dookie and take a long fall. Maybe some of the wonderful art we've made for you will be featured on Associated Press, that'd be dope.
 
Yeah. In fact, it was a short period of time before her 15th birthday according to Tom. Tom diddly-diddled a 14 year old, that's a fact.

@Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg Eat a big ole' dookie and take a long fall. Maybe some of the wonderful art we've made for you will be featured on Associated Press, that'd be dope.
14 is even worse.

I hope my posts get included in his lolsuit. Imagine a chunky little ghost avatar and a tag line that says "piss mits" in the public record
 
You'd think being a kike, without any shekels, would make Old Tom commit sudoku. I thought it was an automatic thing for kikes to sudoku once they didn't have any money. Old Tom is probably just a defective kike, like he is defective in all other ways.

The name is "Wasserkike" I don't engage in mortal combat consensually. Never have and never will. It is impossible to humiliate myself to anybody who hates themselves as much as my most devoted toxic fans and people who believe their degenerate, deviant delusions about me.

case in point.
I FTFY, Old Tom
 
Last edited:
Am I right in thinking, his justification is "It's totes legits okay guise, if I statutory raped her, cos I weren't first!!!"???
Please slap me down if I am wrong, apologies if I am.
Yeah basically Tommie and Chaggot make the same argument… “it’s ok to rape children if they are already doing drugs/alcohol and if they have already been raped then you are good to rape them more.”
 
Last edited:
Yeah basically Tommie and Chaggot make the same argument… it’s ok to rape children if they are already doing drugs/alcohol and if they have already been raped then they believe you are good to rape them more.
What makes that doubly disgusting is the 'logic' Tom applies to it.
Teen runaway=Emancipated woman
Almost 16=Can give full consent
Sold body to get by=Sexually liberated
Never said no=Immediate consent

The fact that Tom willfully climbed into a bed with another pedophile with zero hesitation and then proudly tells this story should be all the proof needed to show he's a disgusting human being...and yet he thinks it's innocent.
 
What makes that doubly disgusting is the 'logic' Tom applies to it.
Teen runaway=Emancipated woman
Almost 16=Can give full consent
Sold body to get by=Sexually liberated
Never said no=Immediate consent

The fact that Tom willfully climbed into a bed with another pedophile with zero hesitation and then proudly tells this story should be all the proof needed to show he's a disgusting human being...and yet he thinks it's innocent.

This too.

The sick fuck walked in on a kid (who had a prior history of sexual abuse, no matter how one tries to frame it) being molested and instead of doing what most normal people would do, going “HEY WTF ARE YOU DOING GET OFF HER” he decided “heeeeyy it’s free real estate” and joined in the molestation.

No matter what semantics games Mr Thomas Jay Wasserberg tries to play, THAT is what happened.
 
This too.

The sick fuck walked in on a kid (who had a prior history of sexual abuse, no matter how one tries to frame it) being molested and instead of doing what most normal people would do, going “HEY WTF ARE YOU DOING GET OFF HER” he decided “heeeeyy it’s free real estate” and joined in the molestation.

No matter what semantics games Mr Thomas Jay Wasserberg tries to play, THAT is what happened.
The fact he talks about it like it was a hippie "free love" moment is the most disgusting part about this.

I don't care if it was a "different time", or that we are "too stupid" to understand, or any of the other hundred thousand rationalizations Tom has said about it. I have a right to express my disgust about it.
 
Last edited:
Back