- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
It does say status active, so it appears to be still open for whatever reason. I just thought it was odd that he's only just now made himself aware of her previous activities, to the point of scrambling for an additional extension of time because the motion is almost due. Vaguely wondering now if the current court might have been less likely to continue indulging her freakish ongoing appeals and motions if this had been brought up in a prior motion.