Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Motion to Seal by Melinda. She complaints that mean Kiwis are Cyberstalking her because the Court of Appeals includes her envelopes in her filings
Neat. Last week she was sending stuff certified mail from Christiansburg, VA, and this week it's regular first-class mail with pretty little stamps from Knoxville, TN. Running low on postage funds, I take it.
 
Motion to Seal by Melinda. She complaints that mean Kiwis are Cyberstalking her because the Court of Appeals includes her envelopes in her filings
There is some grim irony to the fact that this document includes envelope scan.
Cute stamps!

That’s actually an almost polite and reasonable request. I wonder who she got to write it?
Still a bit delusional. The only thing we would use her location for is to avoid meeting her in person if someone lives in her corner of the world.
 
Well, she can still stop any further inclusion
Yeah, but we already have the information. It's still a matter of too little too latem
Still a bit delusional. The only thing we would use her location for is to avoid meeting her in person if someone lives in her corner of the world.
As much as I fucking hate Melinda, if I saw her IRL I'd ignore her and chuckle to myself privately. At most I would try to snap a discreet pic. Not even I would walk brazenly up to her and demand her immediate suicide.
 
Motion to Seal by Melinda. She complaints that mean Kiwis are Cyberstalking her because the Court of Appeals includes her envelopes in her filings



It's like Rasputin. You poison the wine, but prepare to shoot him and then drown him just in case the previous two weren't enough.

The amount of autistic motions from Melinda is starting to drive me fucking schizo. She doesn't know when to let the fuck up, I just hope she knows it's gonna bite her in the ass even harder once the case is finally closed and she still loses.
 
She stated multiple times that her goal isn't seeking justice \ winning the case and that this thread does not distress her (therefore her claims of emotional distress are false and she lied in her filing). I think that's enough to label her as a vexatious litigant.
That way be an indication of bad faith. Assuming you could validate and prove any such statements. Vexatious a litigant is a much higher threshold. Which Melinda actually reaches. The 6 attempts to sue Null over what is unquestionably the same matter, or trivially different matters, escalated and shopped from court to court and even appealed to the Supreme Court, all while accruing no costs to themselves via in forma pauperis, is a clear Vexatious Litigant.
I'm just going to put this out there. I feel Melinda is a vexatious litigant by law, but in a courtroom the law on the books doesn't even matter. The court runs on case law which is basically what other judges have decided. Doesn't matter if it fits the letter of the law or not. Where I live most judges are elected. Most of them go unopposed and If I had money to burn I could put out enough ads to gain name recognition and become a judge if I so desired. Basically judges are lazy fucks who spent some money at some point to get where they are. Even for the appointed positions they bought a lower position and worked their way up. This is all based on my locale in the U.S. and experience in the courtroom. Fuck I found myself about to go into a full on rant but it is too late at night. The last time I appeared before a judge, a family friend whispered into his ear (I didn't even ask for it) so my case got moved to the top of the list, my paperwork was in order, and I got what I wanted. In and out of a courtroom in five minutes. The system is corrupt, but I guess I reap the benefits because my family stays connected as much as I isolate myself.
 
Motion to Seal by Melinda. She complaints that mean Kiwis are Cyberstalking her because the Court of Appeals includes her envelopes in her filings



It's like Rasputin. You poison the wine, but prepare to shoot him and then drown him just in case the previous two weren't enough.
Bitch, you cannot claim what someone's intent is because a bunch of autists who record everything recorded your envelopes too.

Even with what little I know of U.S. law, this should be an insta-rejection from the court. Live by free speech, die by free speech.
 
Bitch, you cannot claim what someone's intent is because a bunch of autists who record everything recorded your envelopes too.

Even with what little I know of U.S. law, this should be an insta-rejection from the court. Live by free speech, die by free speech.
As a general rule most courts will on request keep personal addresses private if the litigant is not using their lawyers office as the location of Service. That's really all Mel is asking for in this one. Just to black out the home address. Not to seal the whole case file. It's not unhinged, it will be granted.
 
As a general rule most courts will on request keep personal addresses private if the litigant is not using their lawyers office as the location of Service. That's really all Mel is asking for in this one. Just to black out the home address. Not to seal the whole case file. It's not unhinged, it will be granted.
If she had kept it at that I would agree, but the saying it was copied to the farms with malicious intent with nothing to back that up pisses me off, but unless the judge also finds it to be without merit I'm sure you are right.
 
If she had kept it at that I would agree, but the saying it was copied to the farms with malicious intent with nothing to back that up pisses me off, but unless the judge also finds it to be without merit I'm sure you are right.
I believe last time she argued it's because she doesn't want Andrew to see it.
 
I believe last time she argued it's because she doesn't want Andrew to see it.
Nope. It was literally the same.

Screenshot_20211008-115518_Drive.jpg
 
Im getting confused, there is simultaneously stuff going on both in the lower court, even though that case supposedly ended, and the appellate court at the same time? Can someone please give a brief summary of all the things currently pending and how they affect each other? Sorry if im the only one retarded enough not to get that on my own.
 
Back